Qatar now says it "unwittingly" bailed out Jared Kushner and his 666 5th Ave. disaster.
Excuse me?
Many of us have been explaining for a year how Qatar has been bailing out Kushner. The question is why Qatar is admitting it now but spinning desperately... What news is coming? 1/
2/ Where do we start with Qatar, Trump, and Kushner?
The Steele Dossier and Qatar buying 19% of Rosneft? Dec. 2016
The Saudi/UAE blockade? April 2017
The $184M loan from Qatar-backed Apollo to the Kushners?
I wrote this a year ago:
slate.com/news-and-polit…
3/ And I wrote this in June 2017. Public and damning evidence has pointied towards Qatar's involvement with Russia quid pro quo for almost 20 months... It's awfully late now to cry "unwitting."
It's witless... because there's a witness?
shugerblog.com/2017/06/02/kus…
4/ Why is Qatar suddenly acknowledging its role in the Kushner bailout, but spinning it as unintentional to Reuters? (And Reuters is cooperating with this spin, btw)
When news of the Brookfield deal hit, "eyebrows were raised in Doha."
Really, @Reuters? More like wink-wink.
5/ @Reuters, spinning for Qatar: "The bailout, in which Doha played no part and first learned about in the media, has prompted a rethink of how the gas-rich kingdom invests money abroad via its giant sovereign wealth fund, two sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters."
6/ The Kushner 666 bailout was announced May 2018. Around the same time, reports emerged of a series of suspicious meetings w/ Qatari officials in Trump Tower in Dec. 2016. Many of us connected these dots in the national media.
Qatari officials started contacting me privately.
7/ It is implausible that Qatar just passively invests billions with no information or influence. Now, suddenly, Qatar is going public with its implausible claim of ignorance. Just as soon as the Brookfield purchase of 666 5th Ave from Kushner was safely completed. Convenient.
8/ I put together a timeline of the Qatar/Russia/Trump dealings here, all based on public documents with links. Pay special attention to Dec. 2016. It seems unlikely that these many remarkable coincidences were "unwitting."
shugerblog.com/2018/05/14/rus…
9/ One possibility is, given that the Brookfield purchase of 666 5th Ave from Kushner (the aforementioned "bailout") just closed about 3 weeks ago, Qatar had wanted to keep quiet until the deal closed, but now needs to spin its defense...
10/ Another possibility is that Qatar knows bad news is coming. For example, @ErinBanco and @woodruffbets indicated that a Mueller report on the Gulf states' involvement (especially Saudi and UAE) plus Israel is coming soon. Is Qatar worried about being implicated?
11/ A third possibility is that the Qatar Investment Authority is the mystery foreign-owned state corporation in the Mueller subpoena case, and Qatar knows it can't keep this secret forever. The QIA name doesn't always fit the redacted spacing, but who knows?
12/ Look, it isn't every day you see this story:
"Corrupt nation's leaders tell global media company, 'We accidentally bribed... um, sorry... we accidentally bailed out the corrupt president's corrupt son-in-law after he pushed for us to be blockaded miltarily."
Something is up.
13/ I have proof that the govt of Qatar knew of these questions about their contacts with Trump and Kushner. On the same day I published my @Slate piece on 3/2, I received the following email from the Media Attaché, Government of the State of Qatar. (I'm pasting to conceal names)
14/"Dear Jed,
I just saw your story published for SLATE. Please find below a statement regarding news reports that the State of Qatar’s has been in communication with the Special Counsel’s Office.
I hope that you can include my comments below.
Best regards,
XXX
Media Attaché...
15/ After I had been writing follow-up posts on Qatar, Kushner, Brookfield, and 666 5th Ave. last summer, I received what appeared to be an official invitation to the Qatar Embassy in November, and a follow-up in December. (If it was a fake, it was a very elaborate fake).
16/ Qatari officials are obviously misleading journalists when they claim they were "unwitting" partners in the 666 5th deal. @katekelly & others at @nytimes raised these questions extensively in May 2018. Many of us followed up repeatedly, and Qatar knew. @Reuters got spun.
17/ Even if we assume that these Qatari officials in @Reuters story mean they did not initially plan this Kushner deal, they certainly were "witting" and willing thereafter. They had 8 months' notice to take some kind of action to avoid appearance of corruption - but did nothing.
18/ This quotation in @reuters is priceless:
“There is no upside in investing through funds for someone like QIA. Qatar wants full visibility into where its money goes,” said the second source familiar with the QIA’s strategy.
No upside, other than a good way to avoid visibility.
19/ Qatar seems to be trying to distance itself from Brookfield and its shady involvement. Qatari officials didn't use the word "bailout" themselves in their quotes, but that's their implication.
Time to investigate Brookfield's corrupt interests in nuclear power advantages.
20/ By the way, the Kushners' balloon payment of $1.4 billion would have been due this month (Feb. 2019) if Brookfield and Qatar hadn't bailed them out. Brookfield rescued them from a financial disaster risking bankruptcy.
nytimes.com/2018/04/06/nyr…
21/ @Reuters offers Qatar's defense that it does not have a seat on the Brookfield board.
However, @WendySiegelman has documented how Qatar negotiates special deals w/ BPY to have control of specific projects (e.g. in NY and London). See this follow-up:
shugerblog.com/2018/12/18/mor…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jed Shugerman

Jed Shugerman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jedshug

Jan 28
Remarkably, @baseballcrank's defense of Ilya Shapiro's anti-identitarian tweets...
plays the identity card.
Ilya's anti-affirmative action stems from his family's experience of anti-Semitism.
So race & ethnic lived experience are relevant to judgment, eh?
nationalreview.com/corner/the-dis…
2) I'm not sure what @baseballcrank is trying to say with this word salad.
I think it's a non-sequitur play of the Russian Jew identity card.
Is some logical connection between the different parts of the sentence? I wouldn't want to assume so, b/c that could be stereotyping.
3) Here's @baseballcrank playing the Russian-Jew ethnic card a second time.
I'm glad we agree that race, ethnicity, family & lived experience & empathy are all relevant to interpreting law:
Read 5 tweets
Jan 25
Yesterday I got cursed & ratio'ed for this tweet. Now Day 2 starts with a new round of blue-check-marks making the same point that vaccination is not like abortion.
Here are two thoughts:
1) Yes, I know.
Legal arguments can turn on finding common principles in dissimilar cases;
2) My goal was to build a legal argument building on one 6-3 SCOTUS decision on vaccine mandates into a case to save Roe.
I acknowledge I am being naive about the conservative Justices. But I was naive to suggest consensus or common ground or moderation or nuance on Twitter.
3/ Could I have been more explicit in the first tweet to acknowledge the different stakes? Sure. But even when I clarified in a second tweet, the ratio'ing and the nastiness only escalated:
Read 6 tweets
Jan 5
What could Garland do to investigate Trump for January 6th?
IMHO, the only step for Garland is to appoint a special counsel (a Mueller-type).
And I think that's the only way Garland would go, termperamentally.
It says a lot that he hasn't/won't.
1/
law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/60…
2/ An investigation into Trump, Biden's once and future political opponent, checks both reg boxes:
a) "conflict of interest...or other extraordinary circumstances; and
(b) That under the circumstances, it would be in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel" Image
3/ Because Garland has not yet appointed a special counsel, he is unlikely to do so. It takes time to find a counsel, assemble a team, then more time for them to get off the ground.
Let's say he had appointed one today. There still isn't enough time left to litigate.
Read 6 tweets
Dec 24, 2021
A very merry Christmas to all who celebrate!

(It’s a not-well-kept secret that many traditional-ish Jews not only wrote some of the best Christmas songs, but also love Christmas songs).
It reminds me of a BC time years ago, when a group was trying to set a Guinness record…
1/
2/ (BC = Before Covid)
…for the largest carrolling group ever assembled. I was so excited to participate. I didn’t know the songs very well, and I probably have the worst singing voice of anyone who ever enjoyed singing. Like American-Idol outtakes bad.…
3/ A large group was appealing, so I started practicing a bit…
Then I checked the date: A Saturday afternoon.
Shabbat.
Not walking distance, back when I was trying not to drive on Shabbat…
I said, “Nu, that’s not very inclusive of all the shomer Shabbat carrollers.”
Read 4 tweets
Dec 22, 2021
The Royal Prerogative, according to Blackstone, included which of the following:
A prerogative to...

(H/t @ShaniaTwain, @KingBobbyBrown, @jdmortenson)
Hint: The unitary exec theorists misquoted Blackstone to claim one of these.
Somehow, I keep finding evidence to the contrary.
Please tell Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Thomas that originalists are just making stuff up, so maybe they should be less sanctimonious against Roe & privacy.
I love that a wrong answer is in the lead.
I found more evidence in Aylmer, The King’s Servants, including this page.
He says each question was posed as a “yes, obviously”
Cc: @BlakeProf @MJSteilen @petermshane @narosenblum @Jane_C_Manners @LevMenand @ArsScripta @gauthamrao
Read 4 tweets
Dec 13, 2021
If Trump wins a second term, I hope people understand how Cy Vance, Eric Schneiderman, Tish James and the corrupt Cuomo NY Democratic Machine enabled him all along the way.
2. Eric Schneiderman was too scared to go after Trump.
Wonder why.
newyorker.com/news/news-desk…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(