The Royal Prerogative, according to Blackstone, included which of the following:
A prerogative to...
(H/t @ShaniaTwain, @KingBobbyBrown, @jdmortenson)
A prerogative to...
(H/t @ShaniaTwain, @KingBobbyBrown, @jdmortenson)
Hint: The unitary exec theorists misquoted Blackstone to claim one of these.
Somehow, I keep finding evidence to the contrary.
Please tell Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Thomas that originalists are just making stuff up, so maybe they should be less sanctimonious against Roe & privacy.
Somehow, I keep finding evidence to the contrary.
Please tell Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Thomas that originalists are just making stuff up, so maybe they should be less sanctimonious against Roe & privacy.
I love that a wrong answer is in the lead.
I found more evidence in Aylmer, The King’s Servants, including this page.
He says each question was posed as a “yes, obviously”
Cc: @BlakeProf @MJSteilen @petermshane @narosenblum @Jane_C_Manners @LevMenand @ArsScripta @gauthamrao
I found more evidence in Aylmer, The King’s Servants, including this page.
He says each question was posed as a “yes, obviously”
Cc: @BlakeProf @MJSteilen @petermshane @narosenblum @Jane_C_Manners @LevMenand @ArsScripta @gauthamrao
Well… The wrong answer (removal) was in the lead until I tagged the legal experts who know better (certainly better than the unitary executive mythologists).
Anyway, more originalists’ mistakes and misquotes are detailed here:
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
Anyway, more originalists’ mistakes and misquotes are detailed here:
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
