This right here is why I cannot stand Elizabeth Warren. My disgust for her is rooted firmly in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau which she created on Obama's direction.
2. Consumer protection is an essential function of the govt, but that is not what this agency is actually about. CFPB is an unconstitutional monstrosity that is structured to be accountable to no one.
3. CFPB's budget is not controlled by Congress. So Congress does not have control of the purse string for CFPB. Even the POTUS cannot spend the money Congress does not allocate, but CFPB has no such restrictions on it.
4. CFPB does not report to Congress and it does not report to the President and it does not report to the judicial branch. So who does it report to? Just to its own head, who reports to nobody. I think its legal structure is still in dispute, but Elizabeth Warren is proud of it.
5. Now you heard Elizabeth Warren brag about the banks having had to pay $12 Billion because of their role in the financial crisis. Leaving aside the issue of real culpability for the crisis, it's still fair to say the banks were not entirely blameless either.
6. CFPB did not build a robust case against the banks. Using its enormous punitive powers it just shook down the biggest banks who paid up to get the govt off their backs. That is not even the biggest problem.
7. Now it would have been nice if the $12 Billion was used to make innocent victims of the financial crisis whole. After all, the "C" in CFPB stands for Consumer, right? Noooo. No consumer ever got a single cent of it.
8. Obama admin kept the whole pot of $12 Billion and through all sorts of shenanigans allocated it to "consumer advocacy" groups, almost all of whom are ... you guessed it, liberal outfits who in essence are Democratic party apparatchiks.
9. Now you see the real design behind the creation of CFPB and making it accountable to no one but some singular bureaucrat appointed by a Democrat President who cannot be fired by a Republican President.
10. Such is the creation for which Elizabeth Warren is feeling giddy in the video at the top of this thread. What a freaking hideous act! As an aside, having created it, Elizabeth Warren wanted to head her own creation. Obama said thanks, but no thanks. She was pretty sore.
11. Having been kicked out rather unceremoniously by Obama, she went back to Harvard and ran for Senate. Having tasted blood in DC, she couldn't go back to teaching. Why teach in Harvard when you can extort in DC seems to be her new calling?
The End.
Here's some more color on the colorful CFPB. Listen to Jonah Goldberg, who by the way is a NeverTrumper, so not a fan of Trump or his appointees in general. independentsentinel.com/cfpb-forced-co…
And some more color on CFPB from the President.
The Wall St Journal editorial he references is well worth a read.
What Went Wrong With the CFPB
"I was an aide to Barney Frank. I’ve learned it’s a mistake to create an unaccountable agency." -- Dennis Shaul wsj.com/articles/what-…
1. CFPB vs Wells Fargo
While many cite the $100 million CFPB extracted from Wells Fargo in fines as evidence of the great work CFPB is doing. Most people have no knowledge of the fuller story which is infuriating.
2. Ronald L. Rubin was an enforcement attorney at the CFPB and chief adviser on regulatory policy at the House Financial Services Committee. He had direct visibility into everything that went on within the CFPB. Here's his insider's view on the Wells Fargo case.
3/x. Look at what CFPB didn't do. Like I said, if CFPB protected consumers, I would be all for it. It is a rogue agency which cares far more about maintaining its own power to shake down businesses than it cares about protecting consumers.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Pay heed folks. The below tweet is from a patriot who I believe served our blessed nation in uniform with honor. Now I am going to say something I would never have thought I would say even a few days ago. It's a stream of consciousness thread. Bear with me.
2. Back in early 2016 and for years prior to that, I detested Donald Trump as a rich blowhard who had no relevance to my life. So I ignored him almost entirely. I have never watched a single episode of any of his TV programs and his other exploits were a source of irritation.
3. I only started paying attention to Trump in the second half of 2016 when he became the Republican nominee for president. I had serious reservations about him. But once he got elected, I was compelled to take him seriously. So I reflected diligently on Trump presidency to come.
What do you think the result of the below mentioned survey would be if the question was changed
from:
"Do you think companies should publicly support..."
to:
"Do you think companies should publicly profit from..."? nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-ne…
2. Where public company actions are concerned, there is not a dime's worth of difference between "supporting" and "profiting from." No public company deliberately and willfully takes any action that might hurt their profits.
3. We as a society should of course treat gays with exactly the same respect and dignity and rights and everything else that is accorded to straights. We are all equal.
1. Message for Anyone Bothered By SVB Customers Being Made Whole
Stop with the nonsense. You either don't understand or are scratching a rash you got from somewhere else. It doesn't matter who SVB customers are or what they do. No depositor is ever responsible for a bank failure.
2. Bank failures are always the fault of the bank management and the regulators. And as for the "due diligence," it is fair to expect the bank investors and shareholders to do that and take a bath when they get it wrong. It's not fair to expect bank customers to do that.
3. Expecting depositors to do due diligence on the bank where they deposit their money is like asking every customer who uses electricity to graduate in Electrical Engineering before flipping a power switch to turn on the lights in their home. It is stupid blather.
1. How to Solve a Problem Like SVB
Having delineated in the enclosed thread how we got here, this thread addresses where we go from here. The SVB problem by itself is not that hard to solve, but it is possible politicians (of both parties) will plunge the nation into crisis.
2. First and foremost, let me dispense with the buzz on Twitter created by @elonmusk with his enclosed tweet. This ain't gonna happen. So please stop wasting time reading myriads of columns that have sprung up from this font. Musk is just having fun.
3. JP Morgan Chase would be a natural buyer but government screwed Jamie Dimon badly in 2008 after he came through and bought Washington Mutual at government’s urging. WaMu was the largest bank failure in U.S. history, SVB being the second largest.
There was plenty of mismanagement at SVB, but first and foremost I want to reassure my followers (maybe the events that unfold next week will make a liar out of me, so take everything I say as unauthoritative stream of consciousness).
2. The main thrust of this thread is to point out why the SVB blowout is nothing like the root cause of 2008 financial crisis, and people shouldn't jump to those kind of fears or conclusions. This is very different. Things like this have happened before but ~50 years ago, not 15.
3. 2008 financial crisis was brought on by banks making too many bad loans that were prone to risk of default. SVB was brought down by not making enough loans, but investing the deposited funds heavily in safe bonds which were nonetheless exposed to interest rate risk.