It makes perfect sense when you come from the angle that the SC did not want the report released to the public. The report itself found no collusion and from Barr's memo in June the SC knew the AG would find no obstruction. So what to do? The SC & the angry Dems knew they had zip
So what to do? If they mark the report up and label the classified report Barr could quickly release the report to the public showing that the SC had no case. Remember, the SC was suppose to be confidental. It's how Washington DC works. Use selected leaked confidential info to..
..craft false narratives. The idea IMO was to keep the report confidential as long as possible( while having the Dems scream for release) and slowly leak selected, out of context parts to craft a fake obstruction narrative.
The Dems would then hold hearings, some behind closed doors, where they would push this narrative while leaking to the media. The entire investigation has always been about the crafting of a narrative. It took more than a month for the AG to go through the report and redact.
That month + was suppose to be the time that the narrative was created. If AG and Trump would have followed Standard DC operating procedure even when the report was finally released large portions of the report would have been redacted as Trump claimed executive privilege.
AG Barr screwed them by releasing his 4 page letter stating clearly no collusion and no obstruction. He set the narrative then he continued to screw them by quickly going through the report and releasing almost the entire report. It's became very hard for the Dems and media...
...at that point to craft a false narrative with the full report released, since people can read the report and know the Dems are lying their ass off. The contempt hearing yesterday is evidence for this strategy.
The hearing is the exact strategy outlined above. They used the very small part that was redacted to make it seem AG Barr is hiding something. Vol 2 of the report is 99.9 % unredacted yet the Dems want people to believe that 0.1% contains the smoking gun. It's laughable.
Now imagine what they could do if the report was 50% redacted? Or 90% redacted and only the summaries were released? AG Barr in essence used sunlight to kill the vampires on the left. This is what pissed off SC team. Mueller's letter about Barr's 4 page letter confirms this.
Mueller was mad not because the AG letter was inaccurate with the statement no collusion and no obstruction. He admitted it was accurate. He was upset because without the summaries (their crafted narrative) the letter itself became the narrative. The quick release of the entire..
.....report including the summaries furthered AG Barr's take on the report. As the entire report itself clears Trump of everything. The Dems can't pick and choose selected parts. They can't craft a believable narrative that will give enough political capital to impeach.
They can't use their media to lie because the underlying document is available to the entire public to see. AG Barr and Trump defeated the SC/dems by using sunlight. The actions of the SC to not label report shows they didn't want sunlight they wanted a narrative.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I know there has been so much propaganda and attempts to disparage it, but I still believe in free speech. Not just the act of being able to say what you want when you want, but the POWER of free speech. The ability to entertain ideas that are different than the group.
Free speech allows a society to have a vaccine against propaganda. It allows mutations of dangerous speech into a less dangerous idea. It gives an outlet for people who are angry, pissed off, afraid. It exposes hate speech for what it is with no need for some censor to ban it.
It allows new ideas, new thoughts, new protests. It allows a populous to ask for a Redress of their grievances so that they are not required to take up arms to find a compromise. It allows for an informed population that can make more knowledgeable decisions. It speeds up the
When and if truth social becomes available to us, I'll probably move over there but keep this account until they ban me. I joined Twitter a couple years back to see Trump's tweets without the filter of the MSM, but all I got here is more censorship.
I'm not real big on social media in general. Twit is the only one I engage in to any degree and mostly it's to get information and have discussion. Since twit has decided to limit the info I can get, it's only because of those that follow me that I keep coming back.
I do enjoy interacting with all of you, I always say I have the best group of followers on twit. It rare in this day and age that people can have polite conversations even when we disagree, but the vast majority of the people in my timeline do this regularly.
I don't know many things. I'm not ashamed to admit it. I also know many things. I'm not ashamed to admit it. I'm confident that what I know is true, yet intelligent enough to understand maybe some of it isn't. However, not knowing is not a reason to be paralyzed into inaction.
You have one life to live in this world. You can do whatever you want with it, maybe. It's known that there are people out there that like nothing better than to try to take your life & make it their own by telling you how to live it. You can of course follow their wishes/orders.
You can also tell them to go fuck themselves. Of course telling these people is not enough because they will still think and act as if they own you. At that point you have to make some type of decision. Do you submit and follow along? Do you withdrawal and hope they ignore you?
Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one; for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries by a government, which we might expect in a country without government,
...our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the palaces of kings are built on the ruins of the bowers of paradise. For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform, and
...irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest; and this he is induced to do by the same prudence which in every other case advises
So, not sure if I had covid, think I did. Had all the symptoms but well I don't know for sure. Still it's been about 3 weeks. I wouldn't call The bug I had mild. I hate to get sick. First week was the worse. Fever, chills, sore throat, headache from hell, weak, wasn't hungry
....muscle aches. You know the typical stuff you get from a flu or a cold. The last two weeks had sinus trouble and unproductive cough, couldn't sleep much because of both. Just couldn't get comfortable, sore throat was the worst though. Trouble swallowing and drinking.
Taste buds rebelled, they are still on strike, but today I felt almost 99% normal. The bug seems to come and go in waves. Some days over the last 3 weeks I felt fine. Not 100% but good enough then I'll wake up and be miserable the next day. Strange bug.
I say this simple truth over and over, but for some reason many people don't get it. They don't believe it. They can't wrap their heads around it. They just will not see. Not sure how to explain it any easier. Leftists are not capitalists.
Sure, they may live with, use, and enjoy the trappings of capitalism. They may enjoy having plentiful food, nice homes, indoor plumbing, energy on tap, cellphones, the internet, streaming movies channels, social media platforms, etc etc etc
But see here is the thing. Well, a couple of things. One, they don't really believe deep down in their souls that most of those things they have are due to capitalism. Most think they can have all of those things without capitalism and to a certain degree they are right.