Ivan Pentchoukov Profile picture
May 12, 2019 5 tweets 2 min read Read on X
A note on the "stunning" Kavalec State Dept memo.

A plain reading of the text shows that Steele DID NOT say he was "keen to see this information come to light prior to November 8."

It was an unnamed institution that was keen to do that.
I'm not saying Steele wasn't keen. I'm saying this memo doesn't prove he was. We already know he wanted to help defeat Trump. This memo is useful context but no smoking gun.

John Solomon, whose work I love, made the leap in the original article.
Sen. Lyndsey Graham repeated this mistake in his letters to Mike Pompeo and Michael Horowitz.
So Steele reports to Kavalec that his client was eager to get the info out before the election––proof of motive that the "client" wanted to impact the election. Feels like a much bigger story went unreported.
Notably, Solomon clarifies that it was the "client" who was keen. Graham doesn't make the clarification.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ivan Pentchoukov

Ivan Pentchoukov Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IvanPentchoukov

Oct 2, 2022
One of the most important statistics about modern science:

"More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments, and more than half have failed to reproduce their own experiments."

nature.com/articles/53345…
Reproducibility is only the tip of the iceberg.

theepochtimes.com/major-scientif…
"The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue."

— Richard Horton, Editor-in-Chief, The Lancet

thelancet.com/journals/lance…
Read 4 tweets
May 31, 2022
.@EpochTimes has obtained the Sussmann trial exhibits:

documentcloud.org/projects/sussm…
DX-118

Email exchange between Christopher Scott and Robert Johnston (Crowdstrike), Adrian Hawkins and Jason Lowder (FBI), and Michael Sussmann (Perkins Coie).

On July 27, Johnston says Chris Scott is the CrowdStrike point of contact for the DNC/DCCC hack.
That July 27, 2016, email is a good who's-who of the FBI team working the DNC hack, including some names I never heard before: Adrian Hawkins, Joshua Hubiak, J.K. Mularski, Gerald Cotellessee, Christian Schorle.

PDF: documentcloud.org/documents/2204…
Read 6 tweets
Dec 13, 2020
Leaked files expose mass infiltration of UK firms by Chinese Communist Party including AstraZeneca, Rolls Royce, HSBC and Jaguar Land Rover

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9…
"The analysis also revealed that there were more than 600 party members across 19 branches working at the British banks HSBC and Standard Chartered in 2016. Both have drawn criticism for their response to Beijing's crackdown in Hong Kong."
"Firms with defense industry interests including Airbus, Boeing and Rolls-Royce employed hundreds of [Chinese Communist] party members, the analysis showed."
Read 4 tweets
Dec 10, 2020
BREAKING: Ohio Republican AG files amicus brief in Texas election SCOTUS case "in support of neither party," argues against relief sought by Texas.

@EpochTimes

PDF: supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/2…
Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost argues that the court SHOULD decide whether the Constitution permits state courts and state executive officials "to alter the rules by which presidential elections are conducted."
"The People need an answer, too. Until they get one, elections will continue to be plagued by doubts regarding whether the President was chosen in the constitutionally prescribed manner." -- AG Yost
Read 4 tweets
Dec 8, 2020
The following 8 paragraphs of legal background in the Texas SCOTUS election case are a fascinating historical context worth sharing in a mini thread:
“The individual citizen has no federal
constitutional right to vote for electors for the
President of the United States unless and until the
state legislature chooses a statewide election as the
means to implement its power to appoint members of
the electoral college.”
State legislatures have plenary power to
set the process for appointing presidential electors:
“Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the
Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors.”
U.S. CONST. art. II, §1, cl. 2
Read 11 tweets
Dec 8, 2020
BREAKING: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton today filed an *election* lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin in the United States Supreme Court.

texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/…
Texas brought the suit straight to SCOTUS. Key allegations:

1. Unconstitutional changes to election laws
2. Unequal treatment of voters within each state
3. Voting irregularities "consistent with
the unconstitutional relaxation of ballot-integrity
protections."
From the bill of complaint: "These flaws cumulatively preclude knowing who legitimately won the 2020 election and threaten to cloud all future elections."

PDF: texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/…
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(