I've correctly stated the current state of the law; others are quoting conventional wisdom from before the most recent case on this:
"Failure to comply with the resulting court order would have resulted in contempt of court, enforceable by imprisonment." washingtonpost.com/opinions/be-wa…
1/ Essentially, Congress can go to the federal courts to get its subpoenas upheld. If the subpoena recipient doesn't comply with the court order to honor the subpoena, they can be imprisoned; if they do not show up to the hearing on the issue, they can be brought in (in custody).
2/ I used a shorthand in the first tweet of my thread that understandably confused people; that's my fault. The marshals get sent out by the court that's enforcing the Congressional subpoena, not Congress. It's a direct contempt situation, not a civil suit or "inherent contempt."
3/ Prior to the most recent litigation on this, others would have been correct that (incredibly) only a civil suit, DOJ charge, or Congress using its "inherent contempt" powers for the first time since 1930 would have allowed Congress to enforce a legally issued federal subpoena.
4/ I have no doubt that those who are Trump supporters or who simply, on principle, believe in a strong executive branch will say that the Supreme Court should overrule current precedent in the DC federal court. That's fine but has nothing to do with the situation Congress is in.
5/ I'll grant @rossgarber that what he calls a "civil suit" and I call a contempt proceeding with possible imprisonment involved (thus, arguendo, a "criminal" issue, though more properly a common law issue in equity, rather than law) may be seen as merely a semantic distinction.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Musk is now a bigger fount for toxic, self-aggrandizing bullshit than P.T. Barnum ever was.
He’s an utter 🤡—and that’s both a historical and provable fact. There’s nothing non-journalistic about observing when a man has become infamous for his rank nonsense and foolish gambits.
But that’s only the start of the story.
PROOF has outlined—with full sourcing—how Musk for years avoided politics on the advice of his father, and for years avoided revealing his far-right ideologies for fear they would destroy his business empire.
He was right. It’s happening.
In other words, he *knew* his far-right ideologies would be grotesque to consumers.
He *knew* that if he entered politics in America, those ideologies would cause him to become an instant target for hate from a majority of patriotic Americans—who unlike him believe in democracy.
Musk has been told—repeatedly—that this is a lie. The global population is rising and will continue to rise until 2100, then it’ll decline slightly. Many countries, JUST NOT MAJORITY WHITE ONES, have over-replacement birth rates. Musk focuses on a small number of white nations.
So no, there are NO experts in this field who agree humanity is dying. There are NO experts who have a longterm underpopulation concern. There are NO experts who agree with Musk. The ONLY people concerned are white supremacists who worry white nations may become SLIGHTLY smaller.
But his lie is worse than this. He KNOWS and has been TOLD that rich, developed, often—but certainly not exclusively—majority-white nations see a birth rate decline BECAUSE of their wealth. That’s normal. It does not mean those nations will collapse, just reduce slightly in size.
1. Elon Musk has many biographers; none are “official.” 2. I’m a Musk biographer; I don’t use Musk as a source because he’s a known pathological liar. 3. My second Musk biography (first is below) arrives in 2026.
4. Grok is aware I’m a Musk biographer, as is the world (see my bio excerpt below, from my website). But Grok, by Musk’s design, sometimes struggles to access Substack—which confuses it about my status. 5. I’m a multiple-time NYT-bestselling biographer of public figures.
(🧵3/3)
6. Elongelicals have a favorite Musk biographer—Isaacson—as Walt tells them what they want to hear. He just repeats what Elon says and is himself a fanboy. My methodology is different: I’m a curatorial journalist. 7. You want fan-fiction? Go with Walt. For the truth, me.
ICE used to be a legal operation. Now—without it ever confirming for a judge it has the right person and has a reasonable basis to take irrevocable government action—this is a kidnapping.
If you see something like this, report it to the police.
What the police can do is contact ICE to confirm it conducted an operation that resulted in the seizure of a specific person.
If ICE refuses to confirm the seizure of that person at that time, the police have a Kidnapping on their hands.
They'll be required to act accordingly.
If ICE confirms the seizure of that person at that time, the police can ask when the court hearing for the seized person is so friends and/or family reporting a Kidnapping will be able to attend and speak on the seized person's behalf. If ICE refuses to provide the information...
More than any two men in America, Trump and Musk target for vicious retribution anyone who crosses them.
And more than any two men in America, Trump and Musk complain about media using anonymous sources to report on them.
Just take a moment and sit with those two statements.
The question here is why Trump and Musk have such a penchant for *creating* the phenomena they'll later loudly claim to be victims of.
One answer is that they're both malignant narcissistic sociopaths who can't process empathy and therefore can't put themselves in others' shoes.
But the other answer I have found, as a biographer of both men, is that they desperately need public attention to be on them at all times. They need a piece of all our lives in a way that is actually *clinical*—narcissists literally don't know how to process being widely ignored.