Felix M. Simon Profile picture
Jun 19, 2019 13 tweets 3 min read Read on X
I spent the last week in Germany. As usual when I go back home I try to talk to as many people as possible to get their views on certain issues. One of them: #Brexit and the #ConservativeLeadershipRace

What follows is a short thread on Germany’s harsh home truths...
First off, a mini-methodology. The place I hail from is fairly average for (West) Germany 🇩🇪. Semi-rural, most people employed in the “Mittelstand”, traditional values, but slightly skewed towards the left (social democrats) politically.
All of the following should be treated as small-n, non-representative insights. So take them with a large pinch of 🧂. Still with me? Ok👌here we go...
First off, here’s how much Germans care about Brexit:

They don’t, really.
At least not much.
Most people I talked to didn’t follow Brexit at all, apart from accidentally hearing about it in the news from time to time. The same was true for the Conservative leadership race.
No one was in favour of the EU re-negotiating or granting the UK special treatment. Many still dislike the concessions to the UK under Thatcher.

Variations of “Who do they think they are?” & “We have to think about the EU” were the responses I heard most in this context.
When asked, Brexit is described as a massive act of self-harm which no one can understand. And the last 3 years seem to have cost the UK all its credibility and reputation.

“You simply can’t trust them. One day they say one thing, the next day another.” (M, ~57, craftsman)
Given the signals coming from England since the referendum, support for the UK remaining in the EU seems to have sunk to an all-time low.

“I’m sad to see them go and I’m sorry for Remainers and the Scots but I don’t think it would be good to have them in.” (M, ~25, 👮‍♂️)
Who knows if the EU will grant the UK another extension in October. If it were for the Germans I met, they wouldn’t.

“What’s the point? It hasn’t led to anything and they’ll just waste it again”, as my grandpa remarked.
The leadership contest is seen by many as a waste of time with a pre-determined outcome: Boris Johnson.

Asked about a Johnson premiership people were blunt: “We as EU can deal with him but for the UK he will be disastrous”. Johnson was mainly described as a liar, & “mini-Trump”.
Most people seemed genuinely irritated why anyone would want him as a PM. Most British politicians aren’t well known over here. Many don’t even know who Corbyn is.

With Boris Johnson, that’s different. He’s known - but for all the wrong reasons.
The Germans I talked to were generally highly critical of the #ConservativeLeadershipRace.

Mostly seen as an exercise in pointlessness/backstabbing/party over country. Ppl think time should be used to prepare for Brexit/find out what UK wants, not as a rat race to replace May.
Overall, there was a strong sense of Brexit-fatigue. When I asked what people care about most, not a single one answered Brexit. Instead ppl listed:

- German domestic politics
- climate change
- state of the economy
- future of EU, influence of the radical-right

/ends

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Felix M. Simon

Felix M. Simon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_FelixSimon_

Dec 3, 2023
🚨New working paper on AI disclosure around news 🤖📝

Do audiences perceive news labeled as AI-generated as more or less trustworthy?

In work led by @BenjaminToff we find that the answer seems to be "less" 😳

🔗 Pre-Print:
🧵-summary below ⬇️ doi.org/10.31235/osf.i…
Image
Main-findings:

1️⃣ People perceived news labeled as AI-generated as less trustworthy, even though they did not evaluated these articles as less accurate/more biased.

2️⃣ Those who already trust news a lot & know more about how journalism works are more affected by the AI labels.
3️⃣ People who don't trust news much or aren't very knowledgeable about journalism don't seem to change their trustworthiness perception much, even with AI labels.

4️⃣ Where sources are provided alongside the text, AI-labels do not seem to reduce trust in the content
Read 35 tweets
Feb 15, 2023
Cas has a good point here.

Knowing the Guardian (and looking at the size of the investigation with many news organisations involved) we will likely get more information in the coming days.

But whenever a company claims "We can flip" elections, I get immediately skeptical.
Reminds me of this piece I wrote in the aftermath of the Cambridge Analytica scandal which looked at the rhetoric of these companies and the US political consultancies @CasMudde mentions: Lots of grand claims, very little evidence of big effects.

And a bit less scientific here: medium.com/viewpoints/cam…
Read 10 tweets
May 25, 2022
I was supposed to present my and @evoluchico’s thoughts on how the field of disinformation studies could be reformed at the #ica22 pre-conference #afterdisinfo (unc.live/39Motq9)

As I sadly cannot attend, I summarise it here…📝 Too Big to Fail. Reforming Disinformation Studies from the I
Disinformation is now firmly entrenched in various academic disciplines & well-funded by various actors. Journalists continue to display a keen interest not least given a multitude of crises which regularly bring the topic back into focus.
This is not necessarily a bad thing. Disinformation studies—the loose assortment of researchers, activists, journalists, & policymakers devoted to the study of the creation, distribution & reception of misleading information—has had positive & negative effects.
Read 30 tweets
Jul 20, 2021
🚨Publication alert🚨

⁉️Does the ‘Infodemic’ make much sense? Did we really live through one?
📝In our new paper for New Media & Society, @evoluchico and I take these ideas to court.
💥 Our answers: No & No

Find out why in the thread…

journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14…
In early 2020, the term ‘infodemic’ was suddenly everywhere after a WHO situation report stated the following… Image
Two weeks later, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said “We are not just fighting an epidemic; we’re fighting an infodemic. Fake news spreads faster and more easily than this virus, and is just as dangerous”.

A flurry of papers, reports & news articles followed. Image
Read 48 tweets
Sep 29, 2020
I see Cambridge Analytica is trending again because of this Channel 4 documentary exposing the Trump campaign’s attempted deterrence of Black voters in 2016.

Unpopular opinion: This documentary has some big structural flaws.

Why? Hear me out…
A general point: How is it possible that not a single expert was consulted on this?

Lots of ppl have studied this & would have been able to contextualise some of the claims…

E.g. @kreissdaniel, @shannimcg, @jesse_b_p, @ajungherr, @sivavaid, @davekarpf, @eithanhersh
Had they bothered to ask, @davekarpf would have told them that this is “just” negative advertising (which is still despicable), but not structural voter suppression (eg closing polling stations, etc.). More in this short thread here:

Read 25 tweets
Sep 28, 2020
📰 “Anything that Causes Chaos”: The Organizational Behavior of Russia Today (RT) by @oiioxford colleagues @monaelswah & @pnhoward

I’ve been waiting for this to come out ever since I read an early draft last year.

Link to 🔓version: academic.oup.com/joc/advance-ar…

Some 🔑-findings…
What makes this such a great piece of scholarship is not only the great effort behind it (rivalling some investigative journalism) but that it allows us to see RT through the eyes of those who work(ed) for it & puts an emphasis on the internal, organizational dynamics.
🔑-bits:

- RT is seen as an instrument of state policy to meddle in other country’s politics
- RT is a ‘counterpunch to the West’s anti-Russian narratives and political positions’
- RT shaped by the practices of Soviet media controls of old
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(