True. @Javedakhtarjadu 's ggf issued fatwa of Jihad from Jama Masjid against those who don't believe that Muhammad is final prophet. He was sure this is gateway to Jannat. And exactly like in Moplah riots, the fatwa became excuse to decimate idol-worshipping Hindus....1/n
The ggf of @Javedakhtarjadu Maulana Fazle Haq Khairabadi was a genius in Quran who believed in that school of thought where idol-worshipping Kafirs are worst of creatures and Hindustan is the fiefdom of Muslims. He rebelled against British to protect his fiefdom...2/n
Prior to fatwa against British, the ggf was part of group that caused Hindu-Muslim riots in 1855. They declared that Hanumangarhi temple is actually a mosque of Babur and instigated Muslims to forcefully pray there..3/n
At call of Jihad to capture Hanumangarhi, Hindus stood up. Khairadbadi (@Javedakhtarjadu 's ggf) was angry that 269 Mujahideens were killed by Hindus just because they wanted to offer Namaz in Hanuman Mandir. He was chosen as part of 4 member planning team to settle matters 4/n
In 1857, @Javedakhtarjadu 's ggf Khairabadi was convinced that one Mujahid is equal to 100 disbelievers and hence planned to overthrow British and become rulers of Hindus again. This earned him fame of "freedom fighter". 5/n
Khairabadi, ggf of @Javedakhtarjadu issued a fatwa of Jihad against British and got it signed by 35 Ulemas. The text of fatwa is available today. It does not talk of India or Indians. It only refers to Islam and Muslims. Thus his freedom fight was to establish Darul-Islam...6/n
When his experiment of Jihad against British failed, Khairabadi, ggf of @Javedakhtarjadu denied all charges in trial. He said he is a loyal British fan and has been arrested due to mistaken identity. He claimed some other Khairabadi is traitor and not him...7/n
From Kala Pani, @Javedakhtarjadu 's ggf wrote mercy petitions denying all charges and reaffirming unflinching loyalty to British. But British instead condemned the process of leniency in his case. He died in Kala Pani claiming till last breath that he was a British loyalist..8/n
.@Javedakhtarjadu 's grandfather Maulvi Shamsul Haque was finally able to convince British that his father Khairabadi is greatest loyalist of British ever. But they say, when the orders for his release came, it was found that he died just an hour ago...9/n
A Mazar was constructed to honor the British loyalist where Muslims still pay their respects...10/n
While in jail, @Javedakhtarjadu 's ggf wrote a masterpiece Al-Sauratul-Hindiya in Arabic detailing 1857 rebellion. (British did not know Arabic). The book is not only critical of British but also of Hindus. As per the book, anyone who is not a Mujahid is a sinner..11/n
.@Javedakhtarjadu 's ggf wrote a few more books in Kala Pani - all based on same hate for anything outside his version of Islam. He was especially critical of Jats and called them as looters...12/n
For above tweets, I took reference from multiple sources. An important source is research paper "THE REVOLT OF 1857 AND MAULVI FAZLE HAQ KHAIRABADI" by Aijaz Ahmed published in 2014 in Goldern Research Thoughts journal...13/n
Oh. Did I mention that while @Javedakhtarjadu 's great grandfather Khairabadi instigated others to sacrifice and die for Jihad, he himself led a lavish luxurious life and never even saw a battlefield. And till end, he and his family were convincing British of their loyalty..14/n
Example of communal harmony and secular Jihad of @Javedakhtarjadu 's great grand father Khairabadi.
..15/n
When arrested, @Javedakhtarjadu 's great grand father categorically assured British that he was never against British. He proved his British Loyalty in all possible ways...16/n
If British had pardoned him just a day before, instead of being freedom fighter, @Javedakhtarjadu 's great grand father would have been hailed as greatest loyalist of British...17/n
Here is his hate against Hindus. For @Javedakhtarjadu 's great grandfather, Hindus were as wretched s Christian British. DId not even spare Muslims who were tolerant of non-Muslims. Hence his Jihad aimed to kill all non-Jihadis. Exactly like ISIS.18/n
Another example of ISIS type mentality of @Javedakhtarjadu 's great grand father, now hailed as freedom fighter and saint. Bracketing all Hindus and Christians as sinners. This is from Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, Vol. 48 (1987), pp. 355-365 19/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is no evidence of beef in any of the 4 Veda Samhitas. On contrary, there are ample mantras that declare cow as fountainhead of all prosperities. In fact, as per Vedas, nothing must be done to trouble animals.
Refer my book "Hindu's Fight for Mother cow" for details
Thread:
Swami Shraddhanand was star of Satyagraha movement and faced near-death situations to make it success.
However he dissociated from Satyagraha for following reasons: 1. Gandhi accused Satyagrahis for being responsible for being shot by police (like Godhra victims)
2. Lala Shankar Lal was falsely accused of inciting mob to beat a Muslim police officer Faquir Mohammad. Gandhi wired an order asking Shankar Lal to offer no defense. This prejudiced the court against Satyagrahis.
3. Gandhi would sent posters in bulk asking Satyagrahis to get arrested if police wants so. Other experimental posters were also sent (from safe zone).
Swami Shraddhanand had to burn these posters
When Swami Shraddhanand was murdered by Abdul Rashid, Mohandas Gandhi said: "..I have called Abdul Rashid a brother and I repeat it. I do not even regard him as guilty of Swamiji’s murder. Guilty indeed are all those who excited feelings of hatred against one another."
Gandhi had been blaming Swamiji for launching the largest Shuddhi (Ghar Wapsi) movement in history and hence upsetting Islamists.
There is no way I can even pretend to admire a person who makes murderer of my Gurudev his brother. I share same views on Gandhi as BR Ambedkar
Congress party made sure that name of Swami Shraddhanand, the most influential and respected leader of his time to whom even Gandhi owes his brand image, is completely wiped off from education and historical references.
I fully support increase of marriage age of women to 21 (across all religions) by @narendramodi as being in sync with Sanatan Vedic Dharma & Ayurveda which recommend marriage only after full intellectual and physical development
Other laws must be now modified to support this
In fact I have been a strong protagonist for this and had also written to govt in its earlier term to increase marriage age of women across all religions to prevent LJ and move towards a society of educated women - foundation of Swarga.
Have reviewed counters to this dharmik step. Most are based on flawed logic, wrong data, and against principles of Sanatan Dharma of Vedas. In fact my recommendation is that wise parents must marry women at 24 when brain development is near complete.
Thread:
Clearly @Profdilipmandal has not read Vedas ever. Because Shruti and Vedas refer to same thing.
Open challenge to anyone including him to prove casteism in Vedas and Bhagavad Gita.
On contrary, Vedas and Bhagavad Gita clearly uphold that deeds, intent, swabhava matter
He uses word Shuddhikaran but doesn't tell that the word was used by Swami Dayanand Saraswati to embrace non Hindus in Vedic fold. He used Vedas to prove that casteism is anti-Vedic. Today every leftist book against Hindutva accuses Swami Dayanand of starting Hindutva movement
Swami Shraddhanand, disciple of Swami Dayanand Saraswati, was heralded as greatest champion of social equality by none other than Ambedkar. He made Shuddhi a mainstream movement.