Good morning🌞 - very hot & hazy today so my usual morning hike was le short & more like a stroll. Anyway, US data overnight was meh & weakened the USD somewhat. In Asia, the morning started w/ a whimper as Japan exports contracted -6.7%YoY in June & imports worsened to -5.2% 😬
Got BOK decision at 9 & consensus is a hold but think it should cut rates & if not a cut now the next meeting is fair play. Indonesia'll commence its easing cycle or shall I say reversal of last yr's excessive tightening due to a hawkish Fed. Jokowi's infra push needs a nudge 🇮🇩!
Asia exports in June %YoY (in USD so some FX impact):
Vietnam 🇻🇳+8.5%🤗
Taiwan 🇹🇼+0.5%🙂
China 🇨🇳 -1.3% 😬
Japan 🇯🇵-6.7% 🥶
Indonesia 🇮🇩-9% 🥶
India 🇮🇳 -9.7% 🥶
Korea 🇰🇷-13.5% 🥶
Singapore NDOX 🇸🇬-17.3% 🥶
Q: Who's most impacted?
Korea and Singapore, both heavy exporters👈🏻
If u just take a simple average of Asian exports in June then the contraction WORSENED so u can see that things not looking good for economies very dependent on external demand (🇸🇬🇰🇷😉) & also China given its slowdown. Vietnam recorded strong growth & Taiwan nudged to positive🤗
Chart shows Vietnam diverged from Asia's worsening contraction for 3 reasons:
a) Labor costs comparative advantage (inputs like electricity cheap) & tariff arb;
b) Proximity to China so China +1 strategy
c) Gov focuses on this through trade deals & incentives
d) Infra improving
So the BOK move was exciting but let's get back to my regular programming of Asian exports. How about we talk about China trade? U'd like that wouldn't you?
Okay, June trade was not great for China & China is important b/c it lifted the world out of the GFC & now it's tired 👇🏻
How tired u ask? Well, very b/c of high leverage by the firms, which is domestic in nature & also stress by rising risk aversion despite PBOC easing & tougher external environment.
Ok, wut to do? Imports are CONTRACTING & exports a little better but not good. Ytd exports +0%😬
Stats for June %YoY: Exports -1.3% & imports -7.3% in USD; Ok, but u saw that I smoothed it due to volatility of data & trend is negative esp imports.
How negative? Ytd (Jan-June) exports +0% but imports -4%👈🏻! What does that mean?
Trade surplus +34% ytd & that's the bad news😬
No this +34% of trade surplus is not a sign of strength but rather weakness of domestic demand & don't forget that Xi Jinping had that import fair in Nov which hasn't really turned out to be a big beginning for China import soft power. China boosted global growth & now it's TIRED
If China is not importing as much as before (-4% ytd) then we got a global demand problem if NO ONE PICKS UP THE SLACK. The US is somewhat but not really. Not Europe. Not Asia either & defo not Latam or the Middle East.
Okay, so the -4% is really bad news for Korea for example.
So the -4% ytd import contraction is the aggregate & no everyone is losing out on this sagging Chinese demand. Table below show China exports & imports in Q1 & Q2 by %YoY.
A lot to digest here but let's focus on imports in Q2. Look at Korea -14%, Japan -7%; Taiwan -8%; US -28%
Q2 import growth by China is interesting b/c it shows also the UNEVENNESS OF DOMESTIC CHINESE GROWTH. The 6.2%YoY in Q2 u see from 6.4% in Q1 looks smooth but it masks the divergence of performance.
So Australia +11%. Why? Chinese gov is pushing infra to smooth out the biz cycle
What u're seeing in terms of destination of of imports reflect what's going on in mainland China - growth is uneven by ownership of firms, size of firms & by sectors so don't just take 6.2% & call it a day. As always, the devils are in the details & so study the details of data.
Ok, so let's go back to trade. We know imports are -4% ytd & we know that there are bigger losers of this lackluster demand (yes, Korea is a big loser of declining Chinese demand b/c Korea has the LARGEST EXPOSURE TO CHINA as China is its largest export destination: 25% of total)
Australia is a winner of China infra push so anyone studying the AU market studies Chinese policy b/c it's really about what they want to give incentives via taxes, credit & of course SOEs & local govs.
In all, the decline of Chinese imports is bad news & percolates globally.
So China, by using its current account & by that I mean imports, as a 1st line of defense = China stablization of growth is less helpful to the world as before.
This is key & this is why u see languishing regional exports despite China 6.2% YoY GDP growth in Q2 2019 👈🏻
Why is China using its current account (importing less from the world = spending fewer dollars on foreign goods & so helpful to the CNY as the trade surplus rises) as a 1st line of defense?
B/c NO LONGER able to easily GROW export earnings. Exports expand 0% ytd 😬so no growth👇🏻
Let's look at Chinese shipment overseas by destination in Q2:
Australia down -5% in Q2, why? B/c Australia is not doing that well so its demand lower
HK down
India down
Japan down
Indonesia zero growth
Japan down
Korea down
Singapore down
Thailand zero growth
USA down -8% 🥶
Okay, the US is important b/c it is CHINA'S LARGEST DESTINATION BY COUNTRY, making up roughly 16-20% of total exports.
So the decline of US demand by -8% in Q2 & -9% in Q1 is very very bad news for Chinese exporters & so they need to find new markets or ways to arbitrage losses.
The bad news is that this friction to trade w/ its #1 customer is not going away & will be a source of stress into H2 19. Chinese exporters are clever so will offset w/ arbitrage via diverting trade or re-routing investment but bad news is that it's not just the US getting tough.
Btw, trade & investment go together. U know that b/c it's in my pinned tweet & I always emphasize this.
If exports are not expanding & the outlook is murky at best, then u bet the enthusiasm to investment is very curbed. Nominal FAI data remains weak despite the gov's support 👇🏻
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Prabonomics Wish List: Higher Tax Revenue, More Social Welfare and Rapid GDP Growth.
A thread on Indonesia's 8th President who will lead Southeast Asia's largest economy & fourth most populous in the world in the next five years. Let's go! 🇮🇩
First, what is Prabonomics? Well, we don't know yet but he won on the promise of continuity of Jokonomics that comprised of infra capex, fiscal prudence, and downstreaming of metals (nickel).
Still, let's talk about his objectives. On the economy, he wants:
GDP to rise by 8% in the next 2-3 years (Jokowi only managed 4.1% on average in 10yrs and excluding Covid years then 5.1%) so that is raising GDP growth by 3-4% higher than its current batting average.
How will achieve this 3-4% higher average GDP growth?
Well, more social welfare spending is where we wants to do it. Basically, more free school food, more housing, more self sufficiency of food.
So a mix of social capital & some infra but generally more about social welfare vs the emphasis on highways and new capitals.
How much more? Well, he floated IDR450trn or 30bn for free school lunch for 81m Indonesian or 2% of GDP.
Here is a short thread on why China fiscal policy, specifically central government support, is sorely needed & monetary support so far is not enough.
First, China got triple D problems - deflation, debt, demographic. All going badly.
Regarding deflation, it reflects an imbalanced economy where supply-side support for a long time has led to too much supply relative to demand domestically.
The easiest way to see it? China's producer price index. It's -2.8%YoY for September 2024. Meaning, producers get less money for the same stuff they make vs last year.
Okay, how is this bad? Margin compression. Your revenue is lower if you are a producer. Or DECLINING INDUSTRIAL PROFITS.
The positive side of this equation is that as they produce so much stuff that is not in demand and prices are cheap, then they can sell ABROAD (exports) for much cheaper than the competition.
A cheaper yuan (meaning depreciated) also helped. All those reasons led to China gaining global market share in manufactured goods to the chagrin of big traders like the EU, South Korea, Japan, and even the not big trader like India that has a about USD100bn of deficit w/ China.
Okay, so it's a bright spot as it gets more income than it spends (imports) so it has a trade surplus.
But that is also a source of geopolitical tensions as other countries are not happy w/ their firms going out of business as they can't compete w/ Chinese goods that are literally deflated.
So tariffs are going up, started by Trump in 2018 but frankly increasingly the EU and likely more and more...
Great story about India rice policy. What I find interesting about this is of course the agriculture gets the most subsidy in the budget & one can say that India gives so much more to farmers and the sector than any sector by a wide margin.
That is a distortion that favors them as they are a powerful vote bank. But at the same time, the government also banned the exporting of rice when rice surged and that meant farmers couldn't make more money.
What India does with farming is very interesting. As it is a country with food surplus and the budget gives most weight to farming while most farmers remain very poor and more than 75% work for sub minimum wage.
India's central government expenditure budget. Rural development + agriculture gets so much.
There is a lot of talk about production linked incentives but it really just got 1.5bn in FY25. So that means this budget is just mostly agrarian.
Meanwhile, farmers were blocked from exporting rice, causing rice to rot. This is a policy to prevent rice price from rising, causing CPI to spike.
This is a sector worth paying attention to as most Indians live in rural areas & they matter even if farming is only 16% of GDP.
One of the reasons India deal with w/ the energy and thus the food crisis is that it is a country that has a SURPLUS in food. As in they EXPORT food.
So to make sure domestic prices & supply stay ample during GLOBAL SHORTAGES due to shocks, India curbed food exports from wheat to rice and sugar.
Meaning, India exported less & so the Philippines saw a huge increase in rice price imported (btw, good for Vietnam & Thailand obvs).
Modi reversed his non-basmati white rice introduced in July 2023 but still have export duty on parboiled rice and minimum price imposed on shipments abroad of the white variety of grain.
The best research on India is written by the @RBI and it's called the RBI Bulletin (very similar to BOE bulletin) & it's amazing. Go to the state of the economy for charts/details on what's going on in India & then they always have essays on specific issues.
Central banks are consistently the best place to get information on a particular country. I also like the RBA website as well. Enjoy!
We can read some of these together in case you find it intimidating reading central bank language.
Germany is in structural decline & the path for that was waved by Angela Merkel who:
a) Allowed for mass irregular migration since 2015 that paved ways for Brexit, the far right rise in Germany and Europe
b) Appeasing Russia after its annexation of Crimea and expansion dependency on Russian gas
c) Phasing out nuclear energy.
As a result, Germany today deals with HIGHER input costs (energy is obvs) & also the political fallout of irregular migration.
Sholz of course is a worse politician than Angela Merkel but the path of its demise is paved by her.
The fact that China has pursued:
a) Expansion of coal, solar, wind, and nuclear to REDUCE INPUT COSTS
b) Subsidies in high-tech
c) Allowed for it to be competitive despite higher tariffs in Europe.
Meanwhile, Sholz asleep at the wheels. This is his reaciton: “Our country cannot and must not get used to this,” he went on. “The AfD is damaging Germany. It is weakening the economy, dividing society and ruining the country’s reputation.”
Germany doesn't understand that it cannot pursue its current path of extreme liberalism that worsens its competitiveness and destabilize its own society & expect to do well to lead Europe out of this mess.
Extreme liberalism can only exist in a vacuum or hypothesized world.
We exist in a world of limited resources. Countries like China are just better organized. Believe it or not. Sholz has no clue & will lose in 2025 but before he is gone he is still around to make a big mess.
Continuing to close the last 3 nuclear plants was a disaster.
Statistics versus anecdotes. What do you believe? Well, if you study a Stat 101, the first thing they teach you is HOW the data is compiled & then you learn HOW to read it.
Fact: People feel that crimes are up because they know someone who is personally attacked or themselves;
Also fact: Crime stats show that crimes are down.
Can both be true? Yes, because crime stats can be manipulated by the source of crime but not including crime.
Are the Democrats the party of crime and punishment? Or are they the party of having low crime by REDEFINING what a crime is? Or even counting and prosecuting it?
The reality is that it is hard to know if the statistics are misleading because the beauty of statistics is to be impartial & to be able to aggregate and quantify your perceived reality, which is MICRO, and stats are supposed to help with MACRO & relative past/present/future.
Another example is of course the employment data that is just released by the BLS that revised downward jobs addition by almost a million jobs.
That's a lot. So you were right to think things were weaker than you thought. But you were also right to say that the labor market was strong, until they revise it downward for jobs that are interest rate sensitive.