THREADETTE: Something just dawned on me. You don't see any left-leaning anonymous (or named!) Twitter folks doing investigation of primary source documents, while several on the right do that & expose much otherwise missed. Left can rely on Fake News narratives pushed by MSM. 1/
2/ Knowing the legacy media won't research, you see lawyers putting out the source documents, such as @JohnWHuber@Techno_Fog and @15poundstogo and former intel folks such as @JennaNeen@MikayesFiona doing same. They spend hundreds of hours doing the work of Pulitzers.
3/ And @nick_weil team who puts together all of that work. These folks may well have saved @realDonaldTrump from the lies being peddled because they are in essence the best research team alternative media could ask for. I try to give credit where do, so here's a global 👏👏👏
4/4 And FTR: While I do know the actual identities and credentials of some of the above, my motto from day one on Twitter has been "distrust and verify." So I've always pulled the original source material, researched myself, and rendered my own conclusions. END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨🚨🚨Garcia's attorneys are not happy and they likely have a judge willing to play along. They now want discovery to learn what Trump Administration did to facilitate Garcia's return so allow court to hold Administration in contempt. 1/
2/ Garcia's attorney's seem to think they also have a "get out of jail free card" because SCOTUS ordered Trump to treat Garcia as if he hadn't been wrongfully removed & they only discovered evidence of his crime after that.
3/ And they think they can now challenge what happens to Garcia AFTER the criminal case. That is not ripe, however, because it depends on the outcome of that case.
For those investigating or trying to under the "Prohibited Access" scandal, ICYMI below I highlight how SC John Durham defined "close hold" differently from "Prohibited Access," while IG Report indicated "close hold" to Crossfire Hurricane team meant "Prohibited Access." 1/
2/ This suggests to me that SC Durham was not told Crossfire Hurricane material had been coded Prohibited Access which limited ability of agents searching for it to see the existence of the information. NOR would you understand that from how the IG described "prohibited" or "close hold."
3/ I'd also add that from Brian Auten's deposition, it appears not everyone on Crossfire Hurricane team could view the Prohibited Access documents, raising even more questions.
🚨THREADETTE: Yesterday, I emailed the attorney of record, Niels Frenzen @MigrantsAtSea, a media inquiry concerning his client Susanna Dvortsin, who petitioned as Next of Friend of wife & children of terrorist who set Jews on fire & obtained an ex parte order barring their removal from Colorado. 1/
2/ I asked two basic questions but received no response. I should add a third: What good faith basis did he have that there was jurisdiction to file a habeas case in a district court in an immigration case?
3/ Here's the order & the point re jurisdiction. Lawyers have an obligation not to file knowingly frivolous claims and I am hard pressed to understand what possible good faith basis there was to file a habeas case in the district court.
3/ And here's the injunction court entered. He showed more restraint this time by asking DOJ how they will facilitate allowing aliens to seek habeas relief. Doesn't mean he hasn't overstepped (more on that), but at least he didn't say put them on an airplane now. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…