The question: While applying to divorce Elmi in 2017, *why* did @IlhanMN claim no contact with him since 6/2011 if so much evidence to the contrary was already public?
Why take the risk? (2/x)
@IlhanMN The third document above -- the “motive document” -- seems to have the answer. It reads:
“Ilwad Hirsi born on **June 11, 2012.** The Respondent [Ahmed Nur Said Elmi] is not the father of Ilwad Hirsi. Her father is Ahmed Hirsi, and ... (3/x)
@IlhanMN " ... he and Petitioner [Ilhan Omar] signed a recognition of parentage in 2012."
“The Respondent [Ahmed Nur Said Elmi] has not signed a declaration of non-paternity as the Petitioner [Ilhan Omar] has had no contact with him **since before the child was conceived.**” (4/x)
@IlhanMN That sounds like motive for 8 counts of perjury. @IlhanMN was married to Ahmed Elmi WHILE she had a child with Ahmed Hirsi.
If @IlhanMN had not unequivocally sworn that Elmi was out of her life before she was pregnant in 2011, the judge might not have granted the divorce. (5/x)
@IlhanMN The judge might have demanded @IlhanMN try harder to locate Elmi.
The judge might have demanded both Hirsi and Elmi take paternity tests.
Elmi’s test could be … a problem. (6/x)
@IlhanMN We now know -- from emails made public in the MN investigation into her campaign finances -- that @IlhanMN’s campaign team believed she *really* needed that divorce to have a political future.
That's a solid motive for @IlhanMN’s possible 40 yrs of perjury violations.
Mainstream media deliberately kept the facts from you, because mainstream media thought electing an “identity” was more important than a nation of informed voters.
In 2023, Tim Walz signed into MN law a voting “innovation” so vulnerable to fraud, it’s hard to imagine the bill had any other intent.
Walz legalized ONE-DAY ONLY early voting “pop-up” sites,
with same-day registration,
no photo ID required,
and ballots immediately processed.
And like that… they’re gone. Tim Walz and MN Democrats invented the Keyser Soze early-voting site.
Eleven of them have appeared throughout Minneapolis since October 22nd.
After Tim Walz legalized what most rational adults would presume must be a magnet for voter fraud, a “Pop-Up Voting Team” was assembled to select locations for the sites.
They used neighborhood data on race, poverty, and voters aged 18-34 as key criteria.
One of the “pop-up” neighborhoods chosen will be familiar to Minnesotans aware of the state’s past decade of voter fraud scandals.
Cedar-Riverside (The Cedar Cultural Center site), located in Ward 6, Precinct 3.
See below: Vote-buying in Cedar-Riverside has long been an “open secret,” per witnesses and reports over the years. And obviously suspect data has been the norm.
A reader just asked that I post links to our (Preya Samsundar, Scott Johnson, and myself) investigation here. This article is the best starting point, I’ll hopefully post a detailed thread later today.
By the way, please ignore the unverifiable posts which appeared over the years to denigrate the work.
Our work was only on PJMedia, Powerline, The Blaze, AlphaNewsMN, and our three accounts. Our work told readers how we found/verified the evidence, so anyone could reproduce it.