1 We still have a massive gap between what we were told about “Russian Hacking” of our 2016 election and reality.
Let’s take another look at an old (but good) video of Comey Testimony.
[]
Let’s take another look at an old (but good) video of Comey Testimony.
[]
2 The video starts off with Rep. Elise Stefanik asking Comey about notification protocols...
Specifically, she is pointing out that there was a large gap in time between when FBI started their investigation and when Congress was notified.
Specifically, she is pointing out that there was a large gap in time between when FBI started their investigation and when Congress was notified.
3 At ~ 2:00 mark, Ms. Stefanik specifically asks, “... Why was there no notification prior to the last month.”
IOW, why did you treat this situation differently?
IOW, why did you treat this situation differently?
4 Comey’s reply was short and simple:
“Because of the sensitivity of the matter.”
He doesn’t go on to describe why it was so sensitive...
“Because of the sensitivity of the matter.”
He doesn’t go on to describe why it was so sensitive...
5 At the ~ 3:30 mark it gets more interesting - she presses Comey on Russian efforts.
Specifically, she is asking if they hacked Republicans, as was reported (but often ignored in the grand scheme) during 2016 election.
Specifically, she is asking if they hacked Republicans, as was reported (but often ignored in the grand scheme) during 2016 election.
6 Comey says that “... attempts to penetrate orgs associated with Republican Party” were made.
BUT... “... there were not releases of material” related to Republicans.
This was said while confirming with Admiral Rogers at his side.
BUT... “... there were not releases of material” related to Republicans.
This was said while confirming with Admiral Rogers at his side.
7 She pressed again:
“But it was done to both parties?”
Comey responded, “Correct.”
“But it was done to both parties?”
Comey responded, “Correct.”
8 She then presses forward into the Yahoo hack - for those that aren’t familiar... hackers gained access to (essentially) Yahoo’s entire email system in 2013/14.
It was bad!
[cnet.com/how-to/find-ou…]
It was bad!
[cnet.com/how-to/find-ou…]
9 This was relatively fresh news at that time; DOJ charged 4 Russians on March 15, 2017 for the hack on behalf of FSB.
justice.gov/opa/pr/us-char…
justice.gov/opa/pr/us-char…
10 Ms Stefanik asked a pointed question:
“Was this (yahoo) hack done for intelligence purposes.”
Comey evaded details by responding:
“I can’t say in this forum.”
“Was this (yahoo) hack done for intelligence purposes.”
Comey evaded details by responding:
“I can’t say in this forum.”
11 He probably couldn’t say bc of the case against the Russians - fair enough!
But what we didn’t know then (that we know now) is that Houma Abedin maintained a private email address on Yahoo.
But what we didn’t know then (that we know now) is that Houma Abedin maintained a private email address on Yahoo.
https://twitter.com/2xwide_dreaming/status/1131573569668956161?s=21
12 Worse yet, that account were found on Anthony Weiner’s laptop.
- Weiner was her husband
- Weiner is a disgraced pedophile
- classified info was on his computer
townhall.com/tipsheet/katie…
- Weiner was her husband
- Weiner is a disgraced pedophile
- classified info was on his computer
townhall.com/tipsheet/katie…
13 And even worse yet, the DOJ press release for the Yahoo hack indictment clearly states that the hack was used to gain access to US Govt Employees!
justice.gov/opa/pr/us-char…
justice.gov/opa/pr/us-char…
14 Even more telling, perhaps, is that it mentions they used the hack to access other emails on other systems, such as Google.
Now who do we know that had an email address on google?
Now who do we know that had an email address on google?
15 As if it couldn’t get any worse, guess who else was conducting business through private email?
🤦🏻♂️
🤦🏻♂️
16 (Then) POTUS Obama’s private email address went under the pseudonym of “John Burke”.
For some reason MSM doesn’t report this stuff; here is the Huma-FBI interview where we find out.
Rumor is it was gmail.
For some reason MSM doesn’t report this stuff; here is the Huma-FBI interview where we find out.
Rumor is it was gmail.
https://twitter.com/2xwide_dreaming/status/1131589745233076224?s=21
17 To ensure we’re up to speed, we now know the following:
* didn’t tell congress bc ‘sensitive’
* Russia tried to hack Republicans; didn’t publish
* Comey wouldn’t talk about Yahoo
* Huma got her ass hacked on Yahoo
* Hackers then targeted US Govt
* JP & BHO had private email
* didn’t tell congress bc ‘sensitive’
* Russia tried to hack Republicans; didn’t publish
* Comey wouldn’t talk about Yahoo
* Huma got her ass hacked on Yahoo
* Hackers then targeted US Govt
* JP & BHO had private email
18 But the shit show continues...
The Mueller report claims that Guccifer 2.0 (Russian) used DCLeaks[dot]com to publish the stolen emails, even giving reporters access prior to website going live.
Those allegations are into ‘Russians Hacking our Election’ - DNC, HRS, Etc.
The Mueller report claims that Guccifer 2.0 (Russian) used DCLeaks[dot]com to publish the stolen emails, even giving reporters access prior to website going live.
Those allegations are into ‘Russians Hacking our Election’ - DNC, HRS, Etc.
19 But there is just one problem...
• Comey testified (and Admiral Rogers agreed) that Russians tried to penetrate Republican servers
• BUT didn’t release data!
It’s a small detail, but it’s important!
• Comey testified (and Admiral Rogers agreed) that Russians tried to penetrate Republican servers
• BUT didn’t release data!
It’s a small detail, but it’s important!
20 Many have forgotten, but there were plenty of Republican emails published on DC Leaks!!
That doesn’t square up - Mueller says Russians ran DC Leaks & G2 Persona... but Comey & Rogers say Republican data wasn’t released by Russians?!?
🤔
That doesn’t square up - Mueller says Russians ran DC Leaks & G2 Persona... but Comey & Rogers say Republican data wasn’t released by Russians?!?
🤔
21 So which one is it?
* Did Russians operate DC Leaks server, as Mueller #ShitShow Report says?
Or
* Russians did *NOT* publish Republican materials hacked from their server, as Comey said?
* Did Russians operate DC Leaks server, as Mueller #ShitShow Report says?
Or
* Russians did *NOT* publish Republican materials hacked from their server, as Comey said?
22 If Mueller is right: Why didn’t he address the Republican server that was reportedly hacked... as the source of DC Leaks emails?
If Comey is right: Who actually operated Guccifer 2 & DC Leaks site?
Side Note: Why was DC Leaks site brought down, but Guccifer 2 site STILL UP?!
If Comey is right: Who actually operated Guccifer 2 & DC Leaks site?
Side Note: Why was DC Leaks site brought down, but Guccifer 2 site STILL UP?!
23 This has the appearance, to me, that Russia (and others) has ALL the komromat needed - ON ALL OF THEM - bc Huma’s use of Yahoo.
Who knows —> they may have even given away ‘keys’ to the State Dept. in that hack, as well.
See below: They were all known to email ID & PW info.
Who knows —> they may have even given away ‘keys’ to the State Dept. in that hack, as well.
See below: They were all known to email ID & PW info.
24 Three years into this and there are still MASSIVE gaps to be closed.
What are the chances that we find out that Comey/Rogers are right?
That would mean that the DC Leaks was ran by _____________ ?
[END]
What are the chances that we find out that Comey/Rogers are right?
That would mean that the DC Leaks was ran by _____________ ?
[END]
PS #1: Mueller’s Law Firm was representing Sberbank (re Uranium One) in 2016...
https://twitter.com/2xwide_dreaming/status/1156736707930271744?s=21
PS #2: The ICA and FBI documents reveal that the “hacking” of DNC started in 2015.
Mueller doesn’t even cover 2015 in his report!
Doesn’t cover Republicans, either.
Mueller doesn’t even cover 2015 in his report!
Doesn’t cover Republicans, either.
https://twitter.com/2xwide_dreaming/status/1142587332949884928?s=21
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
