There is some truth to this - the Fixed Term Parliament Act does clearly give the incumbent PM the role to set the date of the election, ie potentially after Oct 31st... but the physics of this manoeuvre, indeed even being seen to brief it could reap quite the opposite by Sept...
Here is the relevant bit of the FTPA - section 7. Even after a hypothetical loss of a vote of no confidence, and 14 days elapsing without regaining it “the polling day for election is to be appointed by HM by proclamation upon the recommendation of the PM”...
... but if seriously contemplated, you’d have a Government headed by a PM who lost confidence vote on 2nd Parliamentary sitting of his office, having never won one, nor won an election majority, pushing through a significant irreversible outcome, explicitly voted against by HoC..
... so technical legal path is there - but really? At this point people reach for the Cabinet Manual... and this is relevant bit which interacts with FTPA -
2.19: “there is a 14 day period during which an alternative Government can be formed from HoC as presently constituted”
... so in situation where a No Confidence vote was lost, there is no doubt, if it was clearly the case that an alternative PM could command the confidence of the House - the sitting PM must advise HM to call for him or her. It’s not the law, but it is the system...
so I’m presuming those saying there is no route/time to stop the PM going for No Deal in fact, not unreasonably believe that an alternative multi party anti no deal Government is far fetched and implausible. Can’t imagine they believe convention on confidence could be discarded
... but (& since June 2017 I have written about a bloc of 30 Tory MPs who I thought would do whatever it takes to stop No Deal Brexit - though some are now ministers)... the sort of situation where far fetched and implausible, become plausible and planned - more headlines like👆🏽
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
it comes down to compute power, who has it, who can fund it…
When I met Sundar Pichai, his particular pride was not at that point Gemini 3, nor YouTube nor latest smartphone…
but its AI Chip, the Tensor Processing Unit, or TPU, Ironwood
2/ this is hugely economic significant.
raw material of the AI boom is compute power offered by those TPU chips, & more commonly now, by Nvidia’s AI chips, when assembled into pods and racks, and supercomputers capable of training AI models and rapid inference… which I saw at the TPU lab:
🚨 Mind blowing interview with Turing award-winning Yoshua Bengio for @BBCNewsnight one of the three founding fathers of AI, is now warning:
“The worst-case scenario is human extinction.”
AI isn’t just risky — it could end us.
1/10 🧵
📺
2. 🤖 He warns that today’s most powerful AIs are already learning to lie, cheat, even blackmail —
because we’ve trained them to win.
Bengio reveals AI's "scary behavior" & self-preservation tendencies. #AI #AISafety #Blackmail
📺
👁️ In chilling experiments, AI lied to a human to get its task done, says Bengio
🤖 blackmailing an engineer after reading in an email it was going to be replaced.
♟️ choosing to hack a computer to win a chess game
US customs messaging note quietly slipped out last night shows that smartphones, the number 1 Chinese export to the US by value last year, exempted from the 125% tariff… alongside chips, processors, wafers, lcd panels, LEDs etc…
8517.13.00.00
Smartphones
US has excluded the single biggest Chinese export, and certainly the most high profile finished good from the tariffs, without publicly announcing it…
Avoiding the very public repricing of IPhones etc across Apple stores, but only in the US….
While obviously smartphones/ iPhones being exempted is big news for now…
Here’s full list of exemptions according to Harmonised US tariff codes that I plugged into its database… lots of semiconductor parts, circuits, processors, solid state storage, flat panel touchscreens 👀
Author of Mar A Lago accord concept that US tariff agenda is basically designed to cause negotiated dollar weakening, (now WH chief economist), gave speech yday which basically suggested that reserve status for dollar was a burden which others might need to “write checks” for
turns on its head the famous description of ex French President then fin minister Valéry Giscard d'Estaing the US enjoyed an “exorbitant privilege” with $ reserve status…
Instead Administration appears to believe this is an exorbitant burden for which US should be remunerated.
It’s part of a narrative that seeks to paint new tariffs (accepted without retaliation) as justifiable payment for burden of strong dollar (eg on US manufacturing exports and jobs)… this new mindset is extremely consequential. The tariffs aren’t going.
President just shared a video on Truth Social saying “Trump
Is purposely CRASHING the market” in order to lower US Treasury yields and the dollar.
The Mar A Lago theory I wrote about two months ago, written by his chief adviser that said tariff chaos would lead to $ deal
Here’s the video…
Dow down another 1000 points…
Obviously RT are not endorsements but why is the President choosing to share this stuff? And if you are another country seeing this, how do you negotiate with this?