The problem with expanding law enforcement powers is who is in charge. So oversight and checks and balances must be in place, or you're just handing Trump more powers to usurp and misuse.
After decades of decaying oversight & conceding power to the presidency-- abused by both parties--the US was not prepared for someone like Trump, who has no respect for the law or norms or public service.
Every would-be autocrat wants their own security force, a Praetorian guard loyal only to them. Purging existing agencies, expanding others, creating task forces, etc.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I only wish the American security establishment supported my views as much as these trolls always say they do so I could stop complaining about them! 🤡😂
At my age, I almost enjoy the nostalgia of outdated Kremlin talking points, back when anyone opposed to Russia (or any former Iron Curtain nation) being a dictatorship was called an agitator under the influence of the Americans. I spend years blasting Burns and I’m still CIA?!
My views have changed little because my values have not changed. I support the use of free world hard and soft power against the rise and threat of authoritarians and terrorists at home and abroad. I have harshly criticized Dem & GOP admins for their failure to do this.
My congratulations to @DGukesh on his victory today. He has summitted the highest peak of all: making his mother happy!
Gukesh impressively surmounted every obstacle and opponent in his path, especially considering his age, and nothing more can be asked. My thoughts on the historical world championship lineage with Magnus outside are known, but that is not the story today.
The level of play was quite high, at least equal to the previous match. Ding showed great resistance. As for the blunders, which world championship, or world champion, was without them? I had my share, and recall the double blunder in Carlsen-Anand 2014, g6. Matches take a toll.
This post provokes strong reactions, least of which is the difference between the Russian and English, with content for the respective audiences. Lamenting RU expenditures & casualties in Syria in the Russian version plays politics when there are no politics in Russia today. 1/7
Russians dying in Syria isn’t the problem, Russians killing Syrians is. We should not express regret over Russia showering Assad’s regime with money, but over Russia showering the Syrian people with bombs. For generations they will curse the Russians who murdered so many. 2/7
As in Ukraine, it's demeaning to say only Putin is responsible. Putin never pulled a trigger. It was Russian soldiers, pilots, bombs & bullets. I didn’t hear of Russian mass desertions or protests. They targeted civilian infrastructure, schools & hospitals, razing cities. 3/7
Had Obama had the courage of his convictions, or any courage or convictions other than US power is bad, Assad would have been gone in 2013. Countless lives saved, refugee waves limited, and likely Putin never attempts to take Crimea. Inaction can be a deadly choice.
This isn’t just hindsight, of course. It was obvious to me at the time that letting Russia help keep Assad in power would have a disastrous legacy. ideas.time.com/2013/09/18/put…
The price of inaction is compounding even today, as the US and NATO nations make similar mistakes in Ukraine. Putin learned, Western leaders did not. 10 needless years of slaughter. Godspeed to the Syrian people today. kasparov.com/putin-toys-wit…
Biden should have stepped down and let Harris pardon Hunter. This would also 1) deliver the first black woman president and 2) ruin all of Trump's made-in-China "45th-47th President" merchandise!
More seriously, the pardon undercuts partisan debate re politicizing the justice system. Trump isn't going to do anything differently, but it is vital to keep principled arguments against it front and center. "Everybody does it" is a streetlight on the road to Hell.
Coincidentally, as I was not thinking at all about a potential Hunter pardon, I talked about the risks of presidential abuse of power in my interview with the @HuffPost that ran the day before. huffpost.com/entry/trump-mu…
America, this is your next four years, or longer. Oligarchs protected by Trump accusing former public officials of the gravest crimes without evidence or even pretense to provide any. Trial by social media, which of course is owned by said oligarch. Russia in the Wild West 90s.
Naturally, this is the sort of garbage produced by the Kremlin–and in fact was solicited by Trump emissary Giuliani & Co against Biden ("I would like you to do us a favor though"), leading indirectly to Trump's impeachment. Vindman blew the whistle & now the payback escalates.
This also seems like a good time to repeat my longstanding question to Musk that was unanswered—were any funds from Russian oligarchs used to purchase Twitter?