Just a quick thread, perhaps troll bait, but it's just to hammer in a basic point: that state socialism does, on avg better than capitalism, & that capitalism is hegemonic now, doesn't undercut that state socialism wasn't very eco friendly, absolute speaking, either
Here's a scholarly article on the USSR copying unsustainable US agricultural practices sci-hub.tw/https://www.js…
Here's an article on how Cuba's ecological situation is worsening as they've undone many of the agroecological gains they were forced to make in the 90s, largely by farmers returning to past ecological practices clovekvtisni.cz/media/publicat…
I'm honestly embarrassed to even cite this rag, but I am doing so because it's a nominally 'socialist' source--suffice it to say, even I am skeptical of its rhetorical slant here, but alas socialist-alliance.org/alliance-voice…
JBF--a much better scholar--here gives a far more balanced account of the USSR, both heavily criticizing it AND praising it, including achievements of its academic ecologists monthlyreview.org/2015/06/01/lat…
An article on sand mining, among the most destructive practices, 60% of which goes to construction in the PRC e360.yale.edu/features/the-h…
Since this is left Twitter, I take it for granted that everyone can list off the usual memes--China's investment in renewables & nuclear, per capita emissions, Cuba's agroecological successes in the 90s, the WWF report on Cuba they've since renounced etc.
Before you cite the Carbon Majors report meme that 100 corporations produce 71% of emissions note that they list the DPRK coal ministry as 1 of them, and heavily blame China, Gazprom, Iran and Venezuela …b4d987d7c03fcdd1d.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com/cms/reports/do…
You might think that as an anarchist, I'd be germane to their lumping of states, and their blaming of China, DPRK, Iran, & Venezuela, but as a social scientist, my first opposition is to total horseshit, which is what the Carbon Majors & 100 companies meme is.
Here's a biased report on Cuba's reversals of agricultural claims (altho primarily concerned w output rather than environment), I'm going to share a more positive one next reuters.com/article/us-cub…
Here's a frank discussion of Cuba's true achievements in Agroecology, its lessons for the US, and its future challenges elementascience.org/articles/10.15…
I want you to compare the People's Daily's coverage of ecology in the PRC, w the frank appraisals of the PRC's own scientists peoplesworld.org/article/china-…
I link these four articles for an interesting reason. 3 out of 4 claim to be in favor of socialism & praising state socialism, however, ALL four variously acknowledge modernization is the source, that states require constant growth & that the AES track record wasn't so great
I end on some broader based theoretical & empirical perspectives, which address all the main memes. They show that modernization drives carbon, that militarization drives carbon, that central planning limits possible ecological downshift, and more.
I link these because they’re anti capitalist, pro socialist, anti imperialism & unequal ecological exchange & discuss w praise the usual things socialists cite as ecological examples, thus highlighting their stance is positive
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I read an anthropologist who argues that with the decline in the relevance of the incest taboo, the age gap has risen to take its place as the vehemently felt & enforced constitutive & structuring taboo around socio-sexuality and more & more I think they were right.
For example, one thing I see people say is that an age difference could be the same as a "sibling" or a "parent", or they'll say, w that difference when I was just a kid they would have been in X grade which reminds them of a familial relationship they had or felt like they had
But anyway the incest taboo in western societies became increasingly and substantially stricter over time, to the point where the Catholic Church banned marriages up to the 4th degree (1/16th shared) and then later to the * 7th degree (< 1/128th shared)
that Kissinger’s death was celebrated but Carter’s is not is a tragedy of historical illiteracy. Carter’s legacy is millions of dead, Soviet collapse & famine, born again evangelism in US politics, the rise of neoliberal economics, & foreign interventionist liberalism
1. Carter was the first major president to legitimate born again Christianity as the basis for politics, and the second to last of the southern democrat tradition among presidents (Clinton 1 being the last).
2. Carter appointed Paul Volcker and oversaw the rise of monetarism & neoliberalism as ideologies in the federal reserve and treasury. He established the new relation between the ‘fiscally sound’ economists with the Democrats, beginning the end of Dems as a labor party
The Irish were basically the foot soldiers of the expansion of Anglo colonialism and as contemporary historians of Irish Nationalism/Republicanism will tell you, the longevity/success of those movements depended in large part on migration, colonies & diasporas (‘greater Ireland’)
And today, Ireland is one of the richest states IN THE WORLD, entirely due to the fact that it functions as: 1. Financial intermediary between US, or UK,with continental EU 2. It acts as a kind of international Delaware, a repository of ghost corporate registrations
As Khalidi argues, this seemingly ever present overly confident attitude, as an ideology & frame for action, plays a substantial role in the failures of the Palestinian National Movement. People have been saying this kind of thing for 100 years.
There was a point a year or two ago when some genuinely new tactical developments seemed to be growing in the West Bank, based around decentralized networked resistance of affinity groups, focusing on concrete tactical aims, local power, and building of civil society
If this had been pursued it may have actually signaled the beginning of the end , because that kind of movement would be very difficult to control with military and police power, would be rendered the settlements in WB undefendable & eventually could do real economic damage
The most awkward radical silence in the U.S. is on the drug war.
It is implicated directly & causally in 100s of Ks to millions of violent deaths.
Indirectly causally linked to millions more violent deaths & to an even greater number of ‘non violent’ deaths.
And beyond that it is indirectly & more marginally a catalyst in still further.
On top of that it is linked to incalculable imprisonment, torture, bodily injury, as well as to egregious to economic inequality.
The role it plays in colonial land seizure is extreme.
The refugees and internally displaced created by it is in the thousands in every country in which it exists. And that doesn’t include the proportion excluded even tho they Meet the definition nor does it include the millions of people & their descendants displaced by its violence
If polling results are to be believed then the two stakeholder groups whose views are most similar on Israel Palestine are Palestinians who are citizens of Israel, and Jews who are not. Both by something like 4:1 support two state solution, 10-20% 1 state, & 0% expulsion etc
While if Palestine Pulse polls are to be believed Israeli Jews and Palestinians in West Bank and Gaza are mirror images—50% of Israeli Jews & 40% of Palestinians support 2SS,14% of IJs & 10% of Ps support 1SS, and 25% IJ & 30% of Ps chose polled options ‘expulsion’ or ‘apartheid’
A majority of diaspora Jews and Palestinians in Israel identify with the left, a majority of Israeli Jews and Palestinians in West Bank and Gaza identify with the right or religious parties