David Priess Profile picture
Aug 8, 2019 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
THREAD: Today, I tried to recall other presidents’ reactions to national tragedies.

Because what I heard today sounded a bit ... different than my memories of how other presidents have risen to occasion.

Here’s some of what I found:
Abraham Lincoln post-Gettysburg:

“The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced.”
Ronald Reagan after the loss of space shuttle Challenger and its crew:

“We will never forget them, nor the last time we saw them, this morning, as they prepared for their journey and waved goodbye and slipped the surly bonds of Earth to touch the face of God.”
Bill Clinton after the Oklahoma City bombing:

“When there is talk of hatred, let us stand up and talk against it. When there is talk of violence, let us stand up and talk against it. In the face of death, let us honor life.”
George W. Bush after the 9/11 attacks:

“Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America.”
Barack Obama after the Newtown massacre:

“I can only hope it helps for you to know that you’re not alone in your grief, that our world, too, has been torn apart, that all across this land of ours, we have wept with you. We’ve pulled our children tight.”
When the country suffers a tragedy and enters a period of national mourning, presidents don’t always do the right things.

But at such times, the least we can expect is for the president to elevate the rhetoric to something greater than himself.

That’s all.

/end thread

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Priess

David Priess Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DavidPriess

Aug 7
THREAD: 23 years ago today, the best known daily intelligence item in history—the article "Bin Laden is Determined to Strike"—appeared in George W. Bush’s President’s Daily Brief.

Here’s the story of its creation, based on my interviews with its author and intel leaders:

1/12 Image
During the summer of 2001, Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet was telling everyone who would listen that “the system was blinking red.”

The CIA-based Counterterrorist Center (CTC) had been warning for months that al-Qaida seemed primed for a major attack.

2/12
From January 20 to September 10, more than forty pieces in the PDB alone related to Bin Ladin.

In response to such analysis, the president several times asked Michael Morell, his CIA daily intel briefer, about the prospects for an attack in the United States itself.

3/12
Read 12 tweets
Mar 12
THREAD: Something interesting this way comes in the new US intelligence community annual threat assessment testimony, as briefed to the Senate today.

It’s about Russia. And nukes. And things left unsaid in the submitted text.

Here we go:


1/9c-span.org/video/?534027-…
First of all, if you’re unfamiliar with the long tradition of unclassified worldwide threat briefings to Congress, catch up with this podcast episode I hosted 4+ years ago with Michael Hayden, Jim Clapper, and Andrew McCabe.

Deep experience here:


2/9lawfaremedia.org/article/lawfar…
The Russia section last year had this interesting line: “Moscow will become even more reliant on nuclear, cyber, and space capabilities as it deals with the extensive damage to Russia’s ground forces.”

See here:



3/9odni.gov/files/ODNI/doc…
Read 9 tweets
Mar 5
THREAD: Speculation has started in earnest about what will happen this year to the tradition of classified intelligence briefings for the major party presidential candidates.

And a lot of what’s being said is wrong, or at least incomplete.

Here’s ground truth —>

1/12
Major-party POTUS candidates have been offered intel briefings during the campaign since 1952.

(Not to be confused with the heavy intel support presidents-elect get—including, since the President’s Daily Brief began in the mid 1960s, a copy of the outgoing POTUS’s PDB.)

2/12
The tradition began in 1952, when President Truman—reflecting on his sudden succession to the presidency in April 1945—offered classified briefings to both candidates (Dwight Eisenhower and Adlai Stevenson) seeking to succeed him.

No statute required it. Just a courtesy.

3/12
Read 12 tweets
Apr 4, 2023
THREAD: Tonight in Fredericton, New Brunswick, at a public event about US presidents and intelligence, I got a question I hadn’t heard in hundreds of engagements on the topic:

“Who are the oddest people to ever show up in a PDB briefing?”

Buckle up. Strange things ahead.

1/9
Usually, for more than half a century, the President’s Daily Brief goes only to POTUS and a close circle of senior national security officials—like vice presidents, national security advisors, secretaries of state and defense, and folks one step removed.

Usually.

2/9
But it ain’t always that way.

The PDB was born in 1964, for Lyndon Johnson—and within a few short years, this most secretive document was going to, among others … Press Secretary Bill Moyers.

3/9
Read 9 tweets
Mar 9, 2023
THREAD: My quick reactions to the U.S. intelligence community’s Annual Threat Testimony, released and briefed to the Senate Intelligence Committee today.

Some surprises, and some disappointments. Let’s go—

1/13
First, appreciate that this annual testimony from intel leaders has a rich history—described in this 2020 episode of the Lawfare Podcast that I hosted with former DNI Jim Clapper, former DCIA and DirNSA @GenMhayden, and former DD/FBI Andy McCabe:

2/13
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the…
Now for this year. Here are things that strike me upon first reading.

First, China. Wow.

More than ever, the PRC isn’t only front and center but interwoven throughout the assessment. And the judgments = blunt.

Don’t believe me? Read it yourself:

3/13
odni.gov/files/ODNI/doc…
Read 13 tweets
Dec 31, 2022
THREAD: As each year ends, I look back at the books I’ve read/re-read or listened to across 12 months.

I’ve read a lot this year—and thought I’d share my list in categories, alphabetically by author within each.

I recommend every one of these books and thank all authors.

1/12
Books I read in 2022 (history, part 1):

Lincoln and the Fight for Peace by @JohnAvlon

SPQR by @wmarybeard

Grant by Ron Chernow

Washington by Ron Chernow

The Cabinet by @lmchervinsky

Behold, America by @sarahchurchwell

The Wrath To Come by @sarahchurchwell

2/12
Books I read in 2022 (history, part 2):

The Craft: How Freemasons Made the Modern World by @JohnDickie1

Lincoln by David Herbert Donald

The Future History of the Arctic by @charlesemmerson

Adams vs. Jefferson by John Ferling

The Field of Blood by @jbf1755

3/12
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(