The big underlying problem with the mania for "background checks" and "red flags" is that the dataset of mass shooters is so tiny (thank God!) that meaningful inferences are hard to draw. Every attribute displayed by any of them is also displayed by countless harmless people.
This is true even if you factor in the vastly larger number of mass shooters the media prefers to ignore because they're not politically useful. Unfortunately, the hunger for a placebo is overwhelming at the moment - Something Must Be Done.
The danger of placebos is that they make politicians feel useful and generate a little positive news coverage in the short term, but they don't actually work. That makes the situation worse because the hysteria grows more intense.
Today you're told that only an extremist would oppose the placebo measure. It's such a small imposition on the people, and we MUST DO SOMETHING. Why are you fretting over how effective it will be? Something is better than nothing!
Tomorrow you'll be told the problem is so much worse than anyone previously suspected because the placebo didn't work. You'll be be told that only extremists would oppose the far more draconian measures that never would have gotten through before the placebo was tried.
We will be pushed down the "path of least resistance" until all resistance is gone. Resistance is a muscle that grows flabby when it's not vigorously exercised. The little placebo measures eat away at your rights because you're accepting the premise of micromanagement.
"Why are you opposing these small measures that compromise your rights and dignity in such a tiny way?" you're asked at first. Later, after they don't work, the bait-and-switch happens: you can't complain about the draconian measures because you accepted the placebos.
Of course everyone would like to find a magic button that switches off horrifying acts of violence. We just need to make the background checks a little deeper (even though most of the killers seem to have little trouble passing them, or steal their weapons from those who do.)
The problem is that once you accept the notion that the magic button is out there somewhere, you're giving the political class an unlimited warrant to find it at all costs. The hunt grows more crazed as the placebos fail to work. It happens all the time in Big Gov politics.
The choice is not between "doing something" and "doing nothing because you don't care about people dying, you monster." NEVER accept that framework, EVER, on any issue. We have been led to the brink of societal disaster with such arguments.
Demand, always, that only demonstrably effective proposals consistent with individual rights must be considered. Political sugar pills are worse than useless. They make things worse because they make it harder to see the real problems clearly and discuss effective solutions.
As they say in the computer world: Garbage in, garbage out. Today's useless placebo proposals become junk data that influences future government decisions - all the more so because the dominant political class will never admit it was wrong.
When politicians demand you give them the power to DO SOMETHING, ANYTHING, RIGHT NOW, you're not agreeing to let them test a hypothesis. You're agreeing to pretend their scheme worked, forever, no matter how obviously it fails. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Among the strangest features of GOP internal battles - be it NeverTrump, or conservatives displeased with nominees like McCain or Romney - is this notion that it would be better to throw an election to the Dems and hope a better Republican nominee comes along next time.
How can anyone still seriously think that way, especially after Obama's "Pen and Phone" dictatorship and Biden wiping his posterior with the Constitution to plow ahead with his student loan vote-buying scheme? No, guys, it is NEVER safe to just toss a few wins to the Dems.
Maybe it's a form of projection, a stubborn illusion that the Dem candidate might be relatively harmless and inert in office, as GOP leaders sometimes are. Those illusions should have been utterly shattered by now.
When pundits wrote a decade or two ago that corruption would become the big story around the world, I was skeptical. People love to COMPLAIN about corruption, sure, but few electorates are prepared to take decisive action against it.
Corruption is absolutely inherent to Big Government. Repeat after me, and teach your children: THERE ARE NO CLEAN BIG GOVERNMENTS. Amassing huge amounts of power and money in a central State is like dropping sugar cubes amid anthills.
One reason Big Governments never get clean is they have so many weapons at their disposal to distract the public from anti-corruption initiatives. Key segments of the electorate get paid off, too. Big Media is easily drawn into the cesspool and made comfortable.
It is difficult to combat totalitarianism through electoral politics because the whole point of totalitarianism is to seize control of elections. They terrorize and propagandize people for years, then hold a "vote" to find out if their techniques were at least 51% effective.
Defeating totalitarianism requires spirited resistance and good humor. Mock them and make them look ridiculous. They can't stand it, because they are driven by self-righteousness. Totalitarians are small people who need to feel large by joining herds and crushing outsiders.
Defy them at every turn. Go where you aren't supposed to go, say what you're not supposed to say, and do it all with a smile. Exhaust their resources while refusing to become demoralized. Raise the price of totalitarianism by bankrupting its corporate partners when possible.
The greatest threat to democracy at present is the deliberate effort to erase nationhood and citizenship through mass migration, against the express wishes of citizens.
You don't have much of a "democracy," much less a constitutional republic, if the ruling elite can ignore voters to erase the border and shower benefits and privileges on foreign nationals. It's an explicit rejection of national sovereignty.
You don't have any kind of "democracy" if the Ruling Class can use mass migration to create a new electorate that votes the way it wants. Votes have little power if the rulers can dilute them at will.
The Democrat Party grows increasingly less interested in pretending it cares about American citizens, or feels any sense of duty toward America as a nation. The Party was never really good at this, but at least it used to make some modest efforts.
As I've written previously, every Democrat thinks their Sacred Agenda is far more important than any vestigial sense of duty they might feel toward the American people. There is no "American people" to them, just groups of favored constituents and despised enemies.
America isn't really a legitimate nation under Dem ideology, which frees them of feeling any sense of responsibility to the country as a whole, or any weight of tradition that might interfere with their quest for power. They see not one nation under God, but the Balkans.
This once again has me thinking about how everything went nuts in American youth culture during the Great Anti-Bullying Crusade, which was really more about the Left studying and adopting classic bully tactics to impose its ideology on vulnerable young people.
One element of the growing social discontent in America today is that you have an entirely feminized Mean Girls ruling class wielding increasing levels of compulsive force to impose its ideology on an essentially masculine middle and lower class.
It's like those Middle Eastern countries where a Shiite minority rules over a restless Sunni population, or vice versa. Centralized power has grown to totalitarian levels, and it's concentrated in the hands of a political elite that shares nothing of the majority's worldview.