Ben See Profile picture
Aug 11, 2019 14 tweets 6 min read Read on X
The Great Barrier Reef will be dead by 2029, with catastrophic consequences for all life on Earth.

[THREAD] Image
'Terrifying':

🔥 2°C of global warming (2029 - 2039) means the destruction of 99% of the world’s tropical reefs.

🔥 Even at 1.5°C (2023 - 2028) 70-90% will die.

Overfishing & pollutants from agriculture, which are also killing the Reef, are 'escalating'.interactive.carbonbrief.org/can-great-barr…
Terrifying consequences.

"You like to breathe?"

⚠️ 85% of oxygen humans breathe comes from the Ocean - we need healthy reefs to survive.

⚠️ Rippling ecosystem collapse

⚠️ 50% of world's coral now dead due to sea floor dredging, pollution, & emissions.businessinsider.fr/us/coral-reefs…
Will the Great Barrier Reef really be dead as early as 2029?

Yes. See this thread on likely temperature rise.

Anyway, it's not just climate:

'By 2025, ...15.7 billion plastic pieces could come into contact with coral reefs.'
blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/06/13/los…

x.com/ClimateBen/sta…
I'm probably guilty of downplaying the ecological emergency when I say 2029.

See this thread on (amongst other things) Coral Reef calamity by 2025.👇
'It is well known in climate science that, even if we stopped harmful emissions tomorrow, global warming would not peak for another several decades. By then, most of the Reef will be long gone.

The argument is simple...the conclusion difficult to avoid'independentaustralia.net/environment/en…
“I dread to think that it might be as soon as next year":

"The problem with a 10-year window that’s required for a decent recovery is that the chances of us having a fifth bleaching event in that time period is actually very high because of global warming"mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-2…
'Irreversible damage to the Great Barrier Reef by 2030 unless immediate action is taken', marine scientists warned in 2014.

Urgent, radical action was required 35 years ago.

⚠️ 160 billion tonnes of CO2 emitted since 2014, and emissions are accelerating.
dailymail.co.uk/travel/article…
Professor Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, who worked on the new research paper, said it confirmed what he predicted back in 1999, when he controversially forecast the loss of reefs on the Great Barrier Reef by 2040.

His old predictions now appear to be conservative.

news.com.au/technology/env…
The 2016 bleaching event was unprecedented in scale and severity:

'some of the headlines it has generated are factually incorrect or misleading...'

The wider truth: state-corporate media downplay ecological catastrophe and keep it off the front pages.
theconversation.com/great-barrier-…Image
The opening image is from here:
theguardian.com/environment/pl…

State-corporate media, **@guardian included**, are the key reason for inaction.

If the public aren't allowed to grasp the severity of the ecological crisis, they won't try to force system change:👇
x.com/ClimateBen/sta…
Increasingly frequent marine heatwaves can lead to the almost instant death of corals, scientists working on the Great Barrier Reef have found.

These episodes of unusually high water temperatures are - like land heatwaves - associated with climate change.bbc.com/news/amp/scien…
🌡️Back-to-back marine heat waves killed half the Great Barrier Reef in 2016 & 2017.

🌡️Extreme marine heat waves - which will be more frequent, larger, more intense, and longerlasting - are 'just around the corner'.

sciencemag.org/news/2019/01/o…
The Great Barrier Reef's inexorable demise appears to confirmed by official assessments:

'In decades to come they will probably still contain some corals, but ecologically speaking they will not be growing, or even functioning.'

theconversation.com/this-situation…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben See

Ben See Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClimateBen

Jul 23
icymi: our coastal cities will be smashed by multi-metre sea level rise within decades Peak global mean temperature, atmospheric CO2, maximum global mean sea level (GMSL), and source(s) of meltwater.  Light blue shading indicates uncertainty of GMSL maximum. Red pie charts over Greenland and Antarctica denote fraction (not location) of ice retreat.
The Greenland ice sheet is now losing around 9 billion litres of ice an hour [Geological Survey of Denmark &Greenland]

With the ice sheet at “a tipping point of irreversible melting”, scientists currently expect an unavoidable sea level rise of 1-2 metres.weforum.org/stories/2025/0…
4 to 10 m sea level rise committed in the coming 2000 years, with the majoroty of that in the coming decades/centuries it would appear.
science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…

x.com/climate_ice/st…
Read 4 tweets
Jul 21
BREAKING: horrific worst-case scenarios firmly back on the table as scientists confirm large-scale Earth systems such as forests, ice sheets, and ocean currents may already be collapsing 🧵
'large-scale Earth systems may be experiencing gradual collapses that are easy to miss, with profound implications

"we may already be crossing tipping points without realizing"

Slow changes can be deceptive

some systems may slide into collapse silently'
phys.org/news/2025-07-e…
Read 5 tweets
Jul 19
BREAKING: as global warming accelerates wildly normally reticent Establishment scientists begin to discuss plausibility of near-term human extinction 🧵
1/'It seems very unlikely that extinction is on the table for any but the most severe scenarios of climate negligence. However, it is easy to envision a collapse of human civilization.'

What Dr Mann won't say: new papers show 3.5-5°C is entirely likely. gizmodo.com/is-climate-cha…
2/We know relatively low levels of warming like 2 or 2.5°C (which are in fact absolutely extreme given the rapid rate of change) could mean human extinction. Dr Mann would agree 2.25-3.25°C is likely/very likely to hit in a few/handful of decades.

Thread:
Read 6 tweets
Jul 19
BREAKING: climate scientists say it's now easy to envision a collapse of human civilization 🧵
1. it is easy to envision a collapse of human civilization:

'Without even appealing to the uncertain science of climate tipping points, the known impacts of climate change.. would be more than adequate to destabilize our societal infrastructure.'
gizmodo.com/is-climate-cha…
2. Climate scientists project 2°C and rising by the 2030s/40s, with 2.5°C or more by the 2040s/50s or soon after. There is no evidence whatsoever humans can survive that rate of change and the abrupt shift to extreme new conditions.

2-4°C is very likely.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 21
Has capitalism left it too late to avoid hellish 2/2.5°C of global warming and rising?

Yes.

Can we adapt?

No.

Has the scientific community issued major consensus reports indicating political-economic systems changes are mandatory?

Yes.

Will journalists reveal this?

No.

🧵
The planet you think you're living on no longer exists. This Extinction Economy has set up conditions which scientists fear will prove unsurvivable for the majority of species within decades. Change this Doom-growth system now while it's still too late.
Global warming will happen faster than expected
Mass extinction media won't explain why we will hit 2/2.5°C by or before 2040-41. They are part of the state-corporate doom machine and don't want you researching clouds, aerosols, and climate sensitivity. Time to rethink to protect species and everyone.

Read 9 tweets
Jun 17
BREAKING: fears of catastrophe grow as Establishment scientists who organised IPCC's dangerously wrong climate assumptions begin to acknowledge they were wrong 🧵
1. Are Establishment figures really beginning to acknowledge their mistake? Scientists like Hansen, Simons, etc have been pointing out the likelihood of 2°C by the 2030s for a long time, but corporate journalists naturally refuse to investigate seriously.
2. Conservative scientists have insisted for years we should disregard models that show even more extreme warming should be anticipated (and sooner) than the already extreme warming previously expected.

carbonbrief.org/guest-post-how…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(