China was always reluctant to kill the golden-egg-laying goose in Hong Kong, and the trade war made them even more hesitant, but it was inevitable their cost/benefit calculations would eventually make a crackdown appear less costly than continued chaos. That moment is at hand.
When it happens, remember it. Remember the courage of the protesters and the principles they stood for. Make Communist China pay the most agonizing price possible for its brutality, and make them aware of how high that price will be RIGHT NOW.
Today is a rare moment. Between Hong Kong and Moscow, it's one of the few times in the Internet era that freedom and democracy are more viral than totalitarianism. The tyrants are actually sweating a little.
Watch as China and Russia, the two states most enthusiastic about corrupting the politics of other nations, shriek in paranoid fear that protesters are the puppets of America and Europe, deployed in a bid to destabilize their tyrannies.
For the first time since the fall of the Soviet Union, evil empires are trembling with fear as revolutions threaten to spread like wildfire. They will suppress those revolutions, because they studied the end of the Soviet era carefully and developed counter-measures.
We have learned to our sorrow that the Internet is not the unstoppable force for liberty and free speech we wanted it to be. It's at least as useful as an instrument of oppression, and arguably more so. Combined with old-fashioned violence, it cements repressive regimes in power.
But we CAN use the Internet to make those regimes pay the maximum price for suppressing freedom. We can make it cost them more, MUCH more, when they roll the tanks. We can keep the memory of freedom alive and give them more speech to repress.
I doubt we can make the cost of repression so high that Beijing recalculates its spreadsheets and decides concessions to the Hong Kong protesters would be less costly than a crackdown. We should try, but they're too worried about the liberty contagion spreading if they give in.
But after the crackdown happens, it will be up to each of us - every Western government, corporation, and individual - to decide how much Communist China should suffer for its evil. We get to decide how weak this monstrous empire becomes.
You can send their investors home empty-handed. You can decide their cheap electronics are not worth the moral cost of doing business with a bloody dictatorship. You can tell them Communist money is not welcome in your economy.
They made a not-unreasonable calculation that in the end, Western principles are negotiable and have price tags attached, while the Communist will to power is not. They know international debate societies like the UN are easily corrupted and defanged.
They think OUR systems of government, our societies, are weak-willed and riven by internal contradictors, forever on the verge of civil war... and our love for free speech gives them unlimited license to pick at those weaknesses, meddle in elections, and sow chaos.
Notice how every other word out of China's collective mouth is "globalism." They think globalism turns capitalism against democracy, creating a wilderness where every principle is for sale, democracies are packs of sheep riddled with traitors, and authoritarians are wolves.
Look at this moment when the authoritarians are panicking, mobilizing thug squads in foreign countries like Australia and New Zealand to beat down free speech, and understand they are truly afraid. They are showing you where their weak points are.
Above all else, the world's authoritarian regimes - communist, Islamist, kleptocracy, you name it - are haunted by the fear they have miscalculated the resolve of the free world, as their predecessors did almost a century ago. May the sleeping giants awaken again. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Among the strangest features of GOP internal battles - be it NeverTrump, or conservatives displeased with nominees like McCain or Romney - is this notion that it would be better to throw an election to the Dems and hope a better Republican nominee comes along next time.
How can anyone still seriously think that way, especially after Obama's "Pen and Phone" dictatorship and Biden wiping his posterior with the Constitution to plow ahead with his student loan vote-buying scheme? No, guys, it is NEVER safe to just toss a few wins to the Dems.
Maybe it's a form of projection, a stubborn illusion that the Dem candidate might be relatively harmless and inert in office, as GOP leaders sometimes are. Those illusions should have been utterly shattered by now.
When pundits wrote a decade or two ago that corruption would become the big story around the world, I was skeptical. People love to COMPLAIN about corruption, sure, but few electorates are prepared to take decisive action against it.
Corruption is absolutely inherent to Big Government. Repeat after me, and teach your children: THERE ARE NO CLEAN BIG GOVERNMENTS. Amassing huge amounts of power and money in a central State is like dropping sugar cubes amid anthills.
One reason Big Governments never get clean is they have so many weapons at their disposal to distract the public from anti-corruption initiatives. Key segments of the electorate get paid off, too. Big Media is easily drawn into the cesspool and made comfortable.
It is difficult to combat totalitarianism through electoral politics because the whole point of totalitarianism is to seize control of elections. They terrorize and propagandize people for years, then hold a "vote" to find out if their techniques were at least 51% effective.
Defeating totalitarianism requires spirited resistance and good humor. Mock them and make them look ridiculous. They can't stand it, because they are driven by self-righteousness. Totalitarians are small people who need to feel large by joining herds and crushing outsiders.
Defy them at every turn. Go where you aren't supposed to go, say what you're not supposed to say, and do it all with a smile. Exhaust their resources while refusing to become demoralized. Raise the price of totalitarianism by bankrupting its corporate partners when possible.
The greatest threat to democracy at present is the deliberate effort to erase nationhood and citizenship through mass migration, against the express wishes of citizens.
You don't have much of a "democracy," much less a constitutional republic, if the ruling elite can ignore voters to erase the border and shower benefits and privileges on foreign nationals. It's an explicit rejection of national sovereignty.
You don't have any kind of "democracy" if the Ruling Class can use mass migration to create a new electorate that votes the way it wants. Votes have little power if the rulers can dilute them at will.
The Democrat Party grows increasingly less interested in pretending it cares about American citizens, or feels any sense of duty toward America as a nation. The Party was never really good at this, but at least it used to make some modest efforts.
As I've written previously, every Democrat thinks their Sacred Agenda is far more important than any vestigial sense of duty they might feel toward the American people. There is no "American people" to them, just groups of favored constituents and despised enemies.
America isn't really a legitimate nation under Dem ideology, which frees them of feeling any sense of responsibility to the country as a whole, or any weight of tradition that might interfere with their quest for power. They see not one nation under God, but the Balkans.
This once again has me thinking about how everything went nuts in American youth culture during the Great Anti-Bullying Crusade, which was really more about the Left studying and adopting classic bully tactics to impose its ideology on vulnerable young people.
One element of the growing social discontent in America today is that you have an entirely feminized Mean Girls ruling class wielding increasing levels of compulsive force to impose its ideology on an essentially masculine middle and lower class.
It's like those Middle Eastern countries where a Shiite minority rules over a restless Sunni population, or vice versa. Centralized power has grown to totalitarian levels, and it's concentrated in the hands of a political elite that shares nothing of the majority's worldview.