Post

https://twitter.com/jennablan/status/1161353139607523330

More from @Trinhnomics

Trinh

@Trinhnomics

Jul 16

Reading this article with great amusement with tons of comments that are so emotional & not backed by why. And they all seem so surprised on outcome. I have been saying this all along - the pass-through of tariffs are not as you think it will be. Why? Because you need to understand how they work & who has the negotiating power.

First, this statement here: "China’s retaliatory tariffs on American imports, the most sustained and significant of any country, have not had the same effect, with overall income from custom duties only 1.9 per cent higher in May 2025 than the year before."

ft.com/content/82e32f…

I mean, it seems to admire China's retaliation, as in it, that is the great thing to do.

Why didn't China collect more import duties even though it retaliated?

Well, because China is not GROWING its imports. It's exporting its deflation.

So its retaliation doesn't have as much "meat" so to speak. They need to sell more than they need to buy.

"But despite US tariffs hitting levels not seen since the 1930s, the timidity of the global response to Trump has forestalled a retaliatory spiral of the kind that decimated global trade between the first and second world wars."

They are so upset at the world for not retaliating. You can sense that in the usage. But remember, the US is a lot of countries' number 1 export market.

So you are not going to PISS off your #1 customer. It's just that simple. Why? Because a lot of countries just don't want to be powering their GROWTH via GROWING IMPORTS.

So what? Well, you then be captive to your "customer". You can always sell somewhere else.

Remember that India got like TONS OF TARIFFS. No one says much. They just say, well, they just tariff Indians & make it expensive for them to buy. Do they retaliate with the same tariff? No. They can, but why would you match someone's policies.

These are Trump's policies on US IMPORTS. You can also TAX your own imports. Btw, MANY COUNTRIES DO.

Read 5 tweets

Trinh

@Trinhnomics

Jul 9

Let's talk about India today. I'll be on @CNBCi at 11am HKT to discuss this particular issue.

First, we all know that India is amongst the least trade exposed and least exposed to the US amongst the big traders.

That being said, the US is the MOST lucrative export market and one it MUST grow if it wants to GROW OUTWARD AND UPWARD through trade.

Why? Look at China PPI today - it's is -3.6%YoY. Look at the Chinese yuan. It is not appreciating like crazy versus the USD. So what? China manufacturing is TOO competitive and will COMPETE with India so exporting to China is not a HIGH MARGIN BUSINESS.

That is the same for everyone who is a big trader. China is a competitor. So fierce that even the Chinese government is struggling w/ this onshore deflated PPI situation so you can see why foreign competitors are pissed off.

First, let's zoom in - India's export as a share of GDP is roughly 2.5% of GDP in 2024. As mentioned, 0.8% is exempted now (pharma, electronics etc). But EXEMPTIONS ARE TEMPORARY. Today, we got threats of 200% tariffs on pharma for example.

Anyway, 1.3% of GDP faces 10% tariff now that will go up to 26% by 1 August if not successfully negotiated down.

India is not too exposed by Trump auto and steel but still somewhat.

Let's look at top 15 exports to the US.

#1 PHARMA, currently exempted but faces sectoral tariffs of a lot.

Look at what India exports to China - ZERO. Zero pharma. 3bn to the EU and 9bn to the US.

So here, you can see that INDIA NEEDS A DEAL.

You can go through all the sectors. Note something. In phones, the EU is a bigger market than the US. Yes 8bn vs US 7bn.

But the EU is not a country but made up of 27 countries. So the US is the LARGEST market by a long shot.

Look at all the ZEROS for China for top items. Not a good market for India.

Read 9 tweets

Trinh

@Trinhnomics

Jul 8

Good morning,

As promised, here is a thread on Trump trade war and what Asian countries are going to do or shall I say who has more room to give Trump a deal than others.

@Trinhnomics interview at 17 mins.

First, let's start with one certainty: Trump tariffs are higher, and they are on sectors (50% steel, 25% alum, 25% auto & more under study), countries (China 20% fentanyl, Canada & Mexico 25% fentanyl w/ USMCA qualified products 0%, and of course 10% reciprocal tariffs on everyone w/ extension ending 1 August for everyone & China 9 August.

Okay, so what?

Okay, let me first discuss the below chart that summarizes the impact on Asia and why different economies will have different negotiating priorities with the Trump administration.

First, big picture. Exports to the US as a share of output (GDP) of respective countries.

Vietnam is the most exposed by a long shot to the US. And that explains why Vietnam was most motivated to climb down from that 46% level to 20% now (40% for transshipment - we discuss later).

Exports to the US was 30% of GDP in 2024. Yep, that high. Good news? more than 10% of GDP was already exempted as Vietnam's largest export was electronics, namely phones, and thus that was exempted.

The rest enjoy 10% until 1 August and then 20% tariff. On a sectoral level, Vietnam faces 50% on steel and 25% on auto but as a share of total, not a big deal, even if not good for those sectors.

Read 15 tweets

Trinh

@Trinhnomics

Jun 27

Good afternoon,

Yes, it has been a while. I have been running around the world & Asia. It was nice seeing so many people and places to share views, but my inner nerdling self fundamentally enjoy sitting at desk listening to music to read and analyze. For those that I got a chance to meet, thank you! People make the world go around - we all yearn to understand our reality & seek to be understood.

Anyway, shall we review first half? And perhaps think about second half 2025, which starts Tuesday next week.

First, we live in a Trump world. By that, we can't escape his decisions, pushing, wanting.

What does he want? That is a question I get a lot. And most people tend to response with this, "He probably doesn't know it himself."

I don't agree. He does. He's clear about it. It's how he gets there and the people that he surrounds himself with to execute it is a big if but not what he wants.

I'll put three things that Trump wants and basically got so far despite everyone calling him TACO (Trump always chickens out).

Three things Trump wants:
a) Tariffs - he likes tariffs. He sees it as a tool to get what he wants, which is to grow US industrial prowess & rebalance US trade. We can disagree on whether this is the right tool or subsidies or industrial policies are better. But tariffs he wants and he gets.

People think TACO is the trade. But tariff is the trade. It's higher. You accept this new normal fine.

I'll give you an example. We got 50% on steel. 25% on aluminum. 25% on auto. +25% fentanyl on Mexico and Canada excluding USMCA products. +20% on China.

And +10% on rest of the world. For China, expires August. For rest of the world, 9th July. Probably gonna get extended.

Read 9 tweets

Trinh

@Trinhnomics

Jun 20

Good morning,

Happy to be back in Hong Kong! The world is on fire, this time, the threat of war widening beyond just Israel and Iran but to the US and that means the gulf.

Meanwhile, Japan sees core inflation rising to 3.7%YoY and this forces the BOJ to hike (it really doesn't want to for many reasons) as it struggles with policy response - note that inflation has been higher than 2% for so long while policy rate is only 0.5%.

So who is most affected by this whole conflict? Well, we all in different ways but the most obvious outcome is oil. Let's take a look.

We Asians IMPORT 69% of oil going through the Straight of Hormuz and the Saudis export the most.

First, let's go through what's happening. Iran has been attacked by Israel and has shown that it is weak. Now that it is weak, it will have to fight back strongly or risk being seen weak.

So it's a question of how it will surrender not whether and when. Will it do that to the US or Israel? It will fight first. Second is the US, will they take this opportunity to wipe out the threat of Iran nuclear power?

If the US is involved, there is a chance of this widening out as US assets in the region will be targets.

Hence the question of the Straight of Hormuz.

20% of global oil consumption flows through the Strait of Hormuz. It is a narrow channel so if that gets choked up, we're looking at a big oil supply shock.

Who's affected? Producers - the gulfs like Saudi, Kawait, UAE.

Who are the importers? Asians, namely China, India, Japan, South Korea. They make up 69% of total imports.

eia.gov/todayinenergy/…

Read 5 tweets

Trinh

@Trinhnomics

Jun 9

Good morning Hong Kong,

Happy to be back in Asia. Paris was great for many reasons - but mostly because the vibe in Europe is much better as people feel more empowered by change that allows people to zoom out from usual distress over political stalemate, even if challenging.

What do I tell clients? Well, the same as I usually do. When you look at data, don't get fixated on a point in a series. Non-farm payroll/jobs data is an example. Markets get so fixated on what the expectations are & whether results are a beat or not. But what we should look at is a trend over time. Revisions happen. Downward revisions or upward. Seasonality happens (strikes/weather/etc). But what does the trend tell you & what does that mean for policy reaction function?

Well, if you zoom out, then what we see is that job gains are SLOWING in the US. And labor market data is lagging.

The ISM, both manufacturing and services, both point to slowing activity.

Meanwhile, we have CPI coming out in May - markets expect 2.5%YoY from 2.3% in April.

So what? What will le Fed do?

Inflation is an interesting figure. Why? Because it mirrors what Trump's doing on tariffs and also the dollar going lower, which means imports cost more now.

Both tell you that US goods inflation should rise over time. But what does that mean for US CPI? Well, most weights for US CPI is housing/services, which are non-tradeable in nature.

So while US CPI is rising, the Fed will want to see if core PCE is rising. Anyway, if employment is softer over time, and inflation is rising, doesn't that constraint the Fed from seeing through the fog and know what to do?

Read 15 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Trinh

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @Trinhnomics

Trinh

Trinh

Trinh

Trinh

Trinh

Trinh

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!