I don't know about you, but this sure as hell seems to be more than just a dog whistle to white supremacists,
it seems like another call to action.
desmoinesregister.com/story/news/pol…
it seems like another call to action.
desmoinesregister.com/story/news/pol…
Seriously, this is beyond disgusting.
King's implication is that rape and incest are suitable paths to ensuring that the United States population remains majority white.
King's implication is that rape and incest are suitable paths to ensuring that the United States population remains majority white.
The assertion that "Plucking anyone out" of family trees that was conceived by rape or incest would have wiped out the human race is most certainly rhetorical bullshit aimed at promoting the above...
if someone wasn't forced to bear offspring generated by rape or incest, there's a good probability that they would have still had children through consensual reproduction.
There's a chance that they would have had healthier or more successful progeny, esp. in cases of incest.
There's a chance that they would have had healthier or more successful progeny, esp. in cases of incest.
When are we going to get laws on the books that don't punish "free speech" for those stochastic terrorism, esp. promoting violence or sexual assault, but put at least some criminal liability on the speaker when the seeds they've planted sprout?
I'm not saying to limit or punish free speech...
But if you give someone the impression that committing a criminal act that benefits you or promotes your ideology in some way is acceptable, you should be held responsible for the enactment of that suggestion.
But if you give someone the impression that committing a criminal act that benefits you or promotes your ideology in some way is acceptable, you should be held responsible for the enactment of that suggestion.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
