General election polls at this point have zero predictive value. That's the case for polls with actual accuracy.
So, put it all in context.
Yes, Trump is vulnerable for two reasons. 1. Style. 2. Unprecedented suspension of ethics for the cause.
But it's all worthless now.
So, put it all in context.
Yes, Trump is vulnerable for two reasons. 1. Style. 2. Unprecedented suspension of ethics for the cause.
But it's all worthless now.
There are worthwhile Qs to ask the electorate even this early. But media polls don't ask them. Maybe they don't know what to ask. Maybe they're afraid of asking them.
Mood and priorities.
But frankly, the @FoxNewsPoll is worded very, very poorly.
E.g. What's an assault rifle?
Mood and priorities.
But frankly, the @FoxNewsPoll is worded very, very poorly.
E.g. What's an assault rifle?
@foxnewspoll Fox has essentially adopted the term for something that doesn't exist.
Another e.g.
"Background checks"?
What background checks? Run by whom?
That's shady, folks. Straight shady.
Another e.g.
"Background checks"?
What background checks? Run by whom?
That's shady, folks. Straight shady.
@foxnewspoll I mean, hell, if we're going to be blacklisted anyway, then I might as well tell you what I really think.
I think a first year college student who wants to be a statistician would know that is bunk.
I think a first year college student who wants to be a statistician would know that is bunk.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
