Years ago, I saw an excellent presentation at MPSA by Katrina Browne, then a grad student at @cornellgov. Here is the working paper (which I kept because I thought the paper was so cool).
The paper highlights some of the famous instances of land sales, such as...
Louisiana Purchase (a personal favorite, since Napoleon needed the money for war financing purposes)
Spain's sale of colonies to Germany in 1899
Seward's 1867 purchase of Alaska from Russia (which Russia considered "Siberia's Siberia)
Here's the $7.2million check!
But there are also relatively recent examples, such as Tajikistan's sale/lease/ceding of land to China reuters.com/article/us-taj…
And land sale was even a way for Greece to address its debt problems (as described in this 2011 @WSJ article)
The idea is that land sales aren't more common because, well, you don't want a lemon.
Think of Alaska. Russia viewed it as "Siberia's Siberia". People called it "Seward's folly". Only later did we discover that it had oil. LOTS OF OIL
So land purchases are rare because such asymmetric information over quality prevents the transactions.
Though straight out land sales are now rare, land "renting" is not. After all, how do you think the US government acquires the land for all of it's overseas bases?
So definitely a need for more international relations work related to land sales.
It was more common in the past than today. But the act isn't unprecedented, even in the 21st century.
[END]
Addendum: Historian Dominic Alessio has published a number of pieces in IR journals related to US land purchases as empire building (h/t @MDRBrown & @The_RickMc)
These include...
...a @FPA_Jrnl piece published this year (on US purchases in Micronesia)
@dimmerwahr Addendum 2: @jonasbunte, Burak Giray, & @patrickshea_ps have a working paper on sovereign land leases -- long term leases are rampant in IR (ties nicely back to the above point about basing):
As I wrote in my latest for @WPReview, shifting patterns in population growth will inevitably influence international politics. worldpoliticsreview.com/global-demogra…
This isn't a new idea. It's one found in classic works on change in world politics.
I pointed out the difficulties in answering that question, namely that we don't actually know when deterrence works (i.e. selection bias)... tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
R2P is "the responsibility to protect its populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity". This means nations can't hide behind the barrier of "sovereignty" to stop interventions.
The House passed a defense supplement for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan.
Ukraine aid was the most controversial portion of the supplement and might cost Speaker Johnson his leadership position.
Why did he do it?
[THREAD]
As is being reported, Johnson stated “To put it bluntly, I would rather send bullets to Ukraine than American boys. My son is going to begin in the Naval Academy this fall....This is not a game, this is not a joke.” cnn.com/2024/04/21/pol…
While it's partly personal for Johnson, his remarks emphasize a larger point, one that I raised in a recent @WPReview column: cutting off US aid won't end the war. Instead, it would embolden Russia. worldpoliticsreview.com/us-ukraine-aid…