Coal generation is already in terminal decline in the U.S. and Europe.
The market is disappearing, according to the CEO of Colombia's Cerrejón, probably the best coal mine supplying countries bordering the Atlantic: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
And in China we're around the peak.
India is thought to be different. @IEA reckons is grows by 3.9% a year to 2023. @BloombergNEF, which tends to be more skeptical about fossil fuels demand, sees coal-fired generation rising by ~50% by 2030:
Indian coal demand (and Bangladeshi, too) is the ultimate justification for the white-elephant Carmichael coal mine being developed by Adani: nytimes.com/2019/08/15/cli…
The weird thing is, the people who know the Indian power market best aren't seeing it. Investment is collapsing. Swathes of the sector are bankrupt. Without state subsidies and state bank lending, there would be nothing.
Interesting @cfa_ind report today puts numbers on it: 2/3 of lending to coal projects is from state banks, but 3/4 of the much larger sum of lending to renewables is private sector.
Even then, and with subsidies for coal still outstripping those for renewables, the government's electricity plan sees more coal generation retired than built in the decade to 2027:
My view is that Indian coal demand is at or very close to its peak.
You can build *new* wind and solar for waaay less than buying *existing* coal-fired power, ~$42/MWh and $37/MWh vs @ntpclimited average tariff of @51/MWh. (new generation should normally cost *more*)
This view is well outside the mainstream, though. Assumption is that government bailouts for coal, renewables deployment falling short, and problems of integrating variable generation will ensure coal gets majority of demand growth.
But looking at the investment landscape, and indeed the government's economic planning, I find the idea that coal power is on the brink of a renaissance in India just implausible. If the prospects are so good, why are investors rushing the exits?
That's probably bad news if you own coal-fired power in India but good news if you breathe the air there, or live on this planet. Read the whole article here:
Over the past few months I traveled to the former and future heartlands of the solar industry — Hemlock, Michigan and Leshan, Sichuan — to understand this chart.
How, in the space of 15 years, did China go from a bit-player in this key solar raw material to complete dominance?
There’s a ready explanation used by trade warriors as justification for tariffs and other bans: Beijing set out to dominate this industry, and may want to use solar energy as a weapon the way Moscow uses gas.
That’s the rationale behind the Biden administration’s 50% tariffs.
You might think that, installing more than half the world’s solar panels every year, China would be brimming over with solar installations.
One thing that really struck me, visiting over the past week, is how much unexploited potential is still there. 🧵
Looking out of plane and train windows in China these days you will see a lot of scenes like the above one. And at first glance it looks like a solar farm.
But it’s actually a farm farm! Polytunnels like this — often quite cheap-looking, with open sides —are everywhere.
China has 60% of the world’s greenhouses, covering about 8,000sq km according to this study last year.
The better crop yields from this have been key to keeping the country fed.
A thing people really do not understand about US companies fretting about their per-car EV losses stories is that this is almost entirely a spurious issue about the unique way US accountants treat certain types of R&D spending. 🧵
I've long been a huge fan of @michaelxpettis and agree with him about most aspects of China's economy, but I think there's good evidence that clean tech, at least, is seeing solid, operationally-financed, productivity-enhancing growth right now. 🧵
A pretty common argument you hear these days to justify trade restrictions on Chinese EVs, solar panels, and batteries is that the industries are only prospering because of unfair subsidies. I don't think that's supported by the data:
The argument goes something like this: China is awash in easy money from state banks; its renewable manufacturers are undercutting overseas rivals; ergo, its comparative advantage isn’t scale, efficiencies or innovation, but the availability of cheap government cash.
Last September I made one of the scariest calls I've made as a columnist — a prediction that consumption of crude oil had already peaked, despite predictions that this was a decade or more in the future:
Well, much of the ocean floor is strewn with these potato-sized pebbles, which appear to form through complex processes over millions of years and are rich in manganese and other useful base metals.
From time to time, people have thought about mining these nodules. The most famous case was an extraordinary Cold War caper in the 1970s, when Howard Hughes set up a fake nodule mining company as cover for a CIA operation to salvage a sunken Soviet nuclear submarine.