This is how terrified the Kremlin is of PROOF OF CONSPIRACY. They're using a Sputnik blogger, Angus Gallagher, who the BBC found (link: bbc.com/news/blogs-tre…) to be part of a Kremlin "misinformation machine," to spread lies about it.
1/ As we approach the release of PROOF OF CONSPIRACY, this Sputnik writer tied to the Kremlin "misinformation machine" has been furiously tweeting out bizarre conspiracy theories about me that would be hilarious if they weren't—as I said—part of a Kremlin misinformation campaign.
2/ RT—the Kremlin's multimedia organ—has been obsessed with me a *long* time, ever since I published PROOF OF COLLUSION. In the last year (I signed on to write PROOF OF COLLUSION a year ago) they've written about me at least 5 times. So I'm on their radar: rt.com/search?q=seth+…
3/ The hope—as ever—is to get purely fantastical misinformation into the conservative jetstream just as conservatives are realizing how damaging PROOF OF CONSPIRACY is to Trump. This is just the start. "Angus Gallagher" is as near to a bot as an feed can be without yet being one:
4/ But let's be clear: the nations most aligned against Qatar are the ones now blockading it—Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Egypt, which are established in the book as the three primary actors in the "Red Sea Conspiracy." These nations are also known for having their own troll armies.
5/ The book discuss in detail the operations of THE LORD OF THE FLIES, the nickname (yes, really!) for the right-hand man of Trump and Kushner's friend MBS (who Trump calls "our man," and who himself claims he has Kushner "in his pocket"). THE LORD OF THE FLIES is called that...
6/ ...because he has a "digital army" of "virtual flies"—what we'd call trolls, bots, or trollbots in America, though there are also some actual human fanatics in the bunch—who spread propaganda for MBS, which propaganda is increasingly (and the book explains why) tied to Russia.
7/ Beginning a few weeks ago, I started to be followed by key figures—with large followings—in the Middle East. One new follower (who actually has far fewer followers than the others) is @Ams_qatar, who was CEO for the Qatar Investment Authority (discussed in detail in the book).
@Ams_qatar 8/ It's clear the book's content—which Qatar will be no happier about than Trump, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain, Hungary, the UAE, or Russia—has begun making the rounds in the Middle East. It was at that moment "Angus Gallagher" showed up spinning wild conspiracy theories.
@Ams_qatar 9/ But "Angus Gallagher" is likely just the start. THE LORD OF THE FLIES is still out there, and (as I said) Qatar won't like the book, either. Nor the Kremlin. Nor anyone who participated in the Red Sea Conspiracy to illegally aid Trump's election. Just wanted everyone to know.
@Ams_qatar 10/ There's certainly a chance the book comes out and these folks realize the truth—this is a story that can't be put back in its bottle, and making up insane conspiracy theories about a professor in New Hampshire won't cut the mustard. But if things get strange—now you know why.
@Ams_qatar PS/ Just for fun, here's *my* trollbot rating. If and when you see people going insane about me or PROOF OF CONSPIRACY, if you use the @BotSentinel extension on Chrome or Firefox I encourage you to look them up. 40% is about the *lowest* rating you'll see—most will be far higher.
@Ams_qatar@BotSentinel PS2/ Apropos of my references to the Saudis, Emiratis, and Egyptians here and in the book—three-fourths of what's called (with the Bahrainis) the "Saudi Quartet"—notice how quickly "Gallagher" turns to focusing on "America's Arab allies" when called out.
@Ams_qatar@BotSentinel PS3/ America's chief *Arab* ally in the Middle East has long been Qatar, inasmuch as we've located our largest base in the region there (which *deeply* angered Saudi Arabia). And now Saudi Arabia is *blockading* America's chief ally in the region—so of course they demonize Qatar.
@Ams_qatar@BotSentinel PS4/ That said, as I noted, Qatari officials won't like this book either. My point is that ex-SoS Rex Tillerson prevented MBS from a *ground invasion* of Qatar—the tiny nation our largest Middle East base is in!—and that intervention is what got him fired. theintercept.com/2018/08/01/rex…
@Ams_qatar@BotSentinel PS5/ So if/when you see Saudi, Egyptian, Emirati, or Russin bloggers/trolls attacking me or PROOF OF CONSPIRACY—a book that significantly takes to task Russia, Israel, and Qatar, too—remember that the first three are *essentially making war on* our *top ally* in the Middle East.
@Ams_qatar@BotSentinel (NOTE: There was a time other nations might have been considered our "top ally" in the Middle East. Pre-MBS, a case could've been made for Saudi Arabia; pre-Sisi, a case could've been made for Egypt; obviously Jordan is a *major* ally; but we chose to put our *troops* in Qatar.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(🧵) THREAD: There’s no purpose in debating Trump supporters on Venezuela. They lack the background to participate in a coherent conversation. Do they know Trump is backing a socialist despot over a capitalist who won the 2024 election by 34 points? No.
It gets worse from there.
1/ People without principles, like MAGAs, desperately alight on random anecdotes to try to “prove” points—as they don’t know how to *actually* prove a point, make an argument, hold a consistent position, marshal evidence, or maintain logical throughlines across diverse scenarios.
2/ So for instance, they’ll tell you that the justness of what Trump did is “proven” by how some Venezuelans reacted to it. But these are the same folks whose political ideology has long been grounded in denying international law and the sovereignty or interests of other nations.
As detailed in 2020 bestseller Proof of Corruption, Trump used Erik Prince, Rudy Giuliani and a megadonor to launch clandestine negotiations in Venezuela that would've effectuated some version of the deal. America is being lied to every which way.
What the NYT-bestselling Proof Series has shown—across 2,500 pages and over 15,000 reliable major media citations from around the world—is that what we think of as many different scandals is *one* scandal: the Trump-Russia Scandal. Ukraine, Israel, KSA, Venezuela... even Epstein.
The Trump-Russia Scandal, as a research topic, is so vast—it covers so many continents, decades, and scandals in various nations—that we can analogize being a scholar of it to being a scholar of the Cold War or the Gilded Age.
We keep speaking of trees without seeing the forest.
So blowing up the dead body of the man Trump deliriously claims stole the 2020 presidential election from him was part of a *law enforcement operation* targeting an entirely different leader? Pull the other leg now. en.apa.az/america/us-str…
It was almost exactly six years ago that Trump told us he thirsted to destroy key foreign cultural sites just to desecrate them and was told in reply—unambiguously—that this was a war crime.
Corporate media appears to be under-reporting or not reporting the mausoleum strike—a media victory for Trump because it at once hides a war crime, hides a fact that debunks Trump’s claims of this being a law enforcement op, and hides a key Venezuelan justification for vengeance.
This anodyne BS is how the NYT summarizes the most corrupt presidency in US history.
Trump said he didn't know what Project 2025 was; he lied.
He said he would get prices down; he lied.
He said he'd only deport criminals; he lied.
He started wars and attacked his own people.
He destroyed the White House. He took bribes. He pardoned monsters. He grifted taxpayers and investors out of billions. He covered up pedophilia. He committed war crimes. He enabled genocide. He savaged federal agencies. He engaged in stochastic terrorism. He simped for the rich.
He cut off student loan forgiveness. He did special business favors for the CCP. He destroyed small farms. His tariffs constituted the largest tax increase on Americans in decades. He told thousands of lies in public. He hid major medical issues. He spread racist disinformation.
UPDATE: CNN confirms that "the envelope [holding the Epstein-Nassar Note] was sent from the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City [where Epstein was being held] to Nassar"—*and* got vetted by federal officials.
Which explains the Virginia postmark (where the FBI is).
So (1) Why won’t the FBI release the 2020 handwriting analysis it did, if that analysis concluded the note was a forgery? (2) How did the FBI preclude the possibility—even *likelihood*—of dictation in 120 minutes? (3) Where’s the *real* Epstein-Nassar note we *know* Epstein sent?
On a separate but related note, I'm astonished at how many folks I thought smart bought the Trump FBI/DOJ explanation instantly—despite none of it making sense.
You realize these are just Trump personal lawyers with no ethics or fear of repercussions, right?
Trump posted this without knowing Nick Reiner was under arrest. He posted it assuming one of his fans murdered Rob Reiner. So if you want to know how Trump will react if fans start murdering his enemies, now you know. He'll celebrate and blame the victims.
Those claiming Trump knew he was commenting on a family dispute are not reading the confirmed, universally reported on post above. Trump makes very clear *his* understanding at the time he composed his post—which may have been last night—was that Rob was killed over his politics.
The post above is far more dangerous, disgusting, and diabolical than anyone is yet realizing. This isn't just Donald Trump pissing on the grave of a critic, it's him signaling that those who do violence in his name are justified because they were—definitionally—provoked into it.