Before the Katzenberg deal, TYT got $4 Million from former Louisiana Gov. Buddy Roemer. In the deal, Kenan Turnacioglu, a parter at investing firm Pointstate Capial, joined the TYT board.
In the 2016 Primary, he donated $2,000 to Hillary Clinton.
TYT added on, and even before the $20 million, started quietly adding senior staff from the largest media companies around, including MSNBC, FOX Intl. (former VP is also a TYT board member) and Yahoo.
Suddenly their makeup became that of whom they dispised --
Mainstream Media.
When the $20 million deal hit, Katzenberg got all the attention, which was justified, considering he spent almost $1 million on HRC and another $1 million on Priorities USA during the 2016 cycle.
He's not a guy you would trust to push the Progressive agenda.
While Katzenberg was getting all the hate, he wasn't the only one investing. In fact, a newly formed investment firm named 3L is listed as the Primary investor according to Crunchbase.
3L's founder, Shawn Colo, got a seat on the TYT board.
Shawn Colo, who according to hissocual media *really* likes Chuck Schumer, started out as a venture capitalist extraordinaire, and in 2006 he started Leaf Group -- with $100 million from Goldman Sachs.
Years later he would turn the profits into 3L, and buy his way into TYT.
There was another notable investor in TYT as part of the deal: Greycroft.
Greycroft is an investment firm started by Alan Patricof.
In 2016, he donated over $60,000 to establisment candidates, including Hillary Clinton.
Alan Patricof is *very* connected to the Corporate wing of the Democrat party.
He stayed at the White House when Bill Clinton was in office, and was National Finance Chair for both HRC runs.
How connected is Patricof?
He even found is way into Jeffrey Epstein's "Black Book".
Side note - Greycroft also manages $1,250,000 of CA Senator Feinstein's wealth.
There becomes a disturbing trend if you can see it:
What once was seen as the champion of independent media has now been financially backed by the establishment.
TYT rallied us against money in politics, then took millions from the people who put it all there to begin with.
They told us they weren't like Mainstream Media companies, then they filled their offices with former senior staff from almost every major one of them.
They became their own worst enemy via their philosophical hypocrisy.
Speaking of hypocrisy, that brings me to Emma Vigeland, daughter of 2 former US Attorneys, both of which (along 178 former Federal prosecutors) also petitioned Rod Rosenstein to appoint a Special Counsel in the wake of James Comey's firing.
One of Vigeland's parents even donated $3,000 dollars to Hillary Clinton in 2016, and was a fundraiser for Kirsten Gillibrand's 2010 Senate run, the latter Vigeland interned for the next year.
No, I will not divulge names. I don't trust the internet.
So, next time Emma Vigeland tries to tell you Tulsi Gabbard is anti-LGBT because she was raised in an ultra conservative household, and that people can't rise above their upbringings, remind her that she was raised by the establishment.
Does that make her anti-Progressive?
TYT has become rife with hypocrisy from the top down.
When Bernie was cheated, instead of donning Yellow Vests, they told you to Vote Blue -- and it didn't matter who.
When that didn't work, they blamed you for voting your conscience.
Just like the establishment.
All of that being said, let me make one thing clear. I do not condone the use of any of this information for the purpose of doxxing or harrassing anyone.
Please, do not do it. Be ethical.
The Executives, the Millionaires, the On Air borderline celebrity talent could care less what us peons think. They live intentionally public lives. They can handle criticism.
Their parents and spouses, on the other hand, do not.
Respect that.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I broke Soros' donation to Sunrise Movement’s PAC over a year ago—and even though the @FreeBeacon is acting like they just found it, their article is massively incomplete.
It doesn't even mention that Soros @OpenSociety gave $500K to @sunrisemvmt in 2019, and $1M in 2020.
Though this article was written a week or so before I broke news of Soros' $1M 2020 donation, if you want the most in-depth look at Sunrise Movement's billionaire donors, you can read my report here: jaeger.substack.com/p/billionaire-…
Last August, Colonial Pipeline spilled into the Oehler Nature Preserve outside or Huntersville, NC.
Colonial revised their volume estimates 3 times (growing exponentially every time) until deciding their last estimate of 1.2M gals was too low. medium.com/@RobletoFire/t…
After being pressed for an updated volume estimate by state and local officials, Colonial Pipeline said they couldn't give one.
And even if they did, the estimate would be "open to interpretation". Meaning, they have no idea how much spilled. medium.com/@RobletoFire/c…
While researching this historic spill, I discovered that Colonial Pipeline had at most inspected only 45% of their 5,500mi line in 2019—and had been cited by federal regulators for numerous procedural violations.
There's a reason why I haven't reported this yet, even though these numbers have been available since February.
Nearly all the money Schusterman gave DMFI was spent BEFORE their recent blitz against Turner—so we can't say for sure she's the donor behind it, though she may be.
Assuming DMFI is a semi-annual filer with the FEC, we'll know for sure who funded their recent blitz on Nina Turner on 07/30.
Lately I've been trying to just ignore all of the so called "in-fighting", keep my head in the research, and focus on what's important: the work.
But my patience has worn out.
If you come at me or my colleagues with bad faith attacks or outright lies, I will expose you.
It's so easy to sit around and creep @nikoCSFB or @Fiorella_im's timeline and disparage their work.
It's much more difficult to do some work of your own.
"Those who can't talk about those who can".
Challenge my reporting if you want but I don't report without receipts. I pride myself on it.
I don't need an entire team of researchers to write a "breaking" story about something that's been known for years, and I don't take credit for scoops that I didn't report first.
The mainstream media is going to keep Trump in the spotlight as long as they can—because he made them stars pulling record ratings.
You wont see the same veracity of reporting on Biden, because criticism of Democratic politicians in those circles will get you blacklisted.
Eventually, they'll have no choice but to put Biden in the spotlight. When that happens, much like with Obama, it will be milquetoast puff pieces full of softball questions.
Then their ratings will bottom out. Why? Because it's boring.
Then they'll invent their next boogeyman.
Don't forget the media's hubris helped push Trump to the forefront of politics, though their coverage was overwhelmingly negative—"Any press is good press".
Plus, he was good for business!
They'll repeat the cycle when they soon become attention starved from his absence.