California used to be Republican. We gave the nation Nixon and Reagan.
Republican candidates won CA in every presidential election between 1952 and 1988 except one⤵️
1/ By 1990, CA demographics were changing, with growing Asian and Spanish-speaking communities.
California's "Latino and Asian populations boomed in the 1990s”latimes.com/projects/la-po…
In the late 1980s and early 1990s came a candidate, Pete Wilson, stoking fears of immigrants.
2/ Here was one of Wilson’s 1994 reelection campaign ads:
“They keep coming . . .” begins the narrative. It's very Trumpian, almost like Trump modeled his own ads on Pete Wilsons'.
Pete Wilson won the election, helped by voter suppression in California.
3/ As an example of California suppression, polling sites “adversely impacted the ability of limited-English proficient voters to cast an effective and meaningful vote.” gould.usc.edu/students/journ…
In plain talk: Non-English speakers weren't provided language assistances. . .
4/ . . . as required by the Voting Rights Act.
Law suits were filed to force CA to stop discriminating against non-English speaking citizens: gould.usc.edu/students/journ…
People here speak other languages: Spanish speakers were here before English speakers. loc.gov/collections/ca…
5/ Chinese were among the first in San Francisco, having built most of the railroads.
Wilson’s signature law, Prop 187 ("Save our State”) denied undocumented persons non-emergency health care, access to schools, etc. It stoked anger against non-whites. jstor.org/stable/2547004…
6/ California has a history of that. We owned the Japanese internment camps in WWII.
187 fanned the flames.
Guess who was doing most of the backbreaking work picking crops in the fields? (Hint: They spoke Spanish.) They also paid taxes.
187 kept their children out of school.
7/ Proposition 187 created a stir—and heated arguments.
This was the part of the plot where the subtext became text.
People said things like, “Why should our taxes pay for schools and hospitals for them?"
(Um, maybe because they pay taxes, too? And they do important work?)
8/ I had a friend who taught school in a rural area. Many of her students had parents working the fields. Now they were to be denied access to classrooms, and even the nurses office.
Shocked into action by Proposition 187, liberals and minority communities organized.
9/ Voter drives were organized. Prop. 187 was successfully challenged in the courts. Lawyers formed voter protection orgs.
By 2000, CA was mostly Democratic, because of changing demographics combined with a backlash against the anti-immigration hate stirred up by 187.
10/ But all wasn’t well.
California had a 2/3 rule, which required 2/3 vote among lawmakers before anything could pass. ocregister.com/2010/10/01/two…
This meant the GOP—now a minority—could hold up the works. The 2/3 rule gave them great power. They could be obstructionists.
11/ GOP lawmakers refused to pass budgets until they got what they wanted.
This was the part of the plot where the party that represents a minority of the population (who used to be the majority) had disproportionate power, and used that power to obstruct.
Sound familiar?
12/ To get anything done, California either had to:
💠get rid of the 2/3 rule,
💠let the Republicans shut everything down until they got their way, or,
💠work hard on elections until 2/3 of the elected representatives were Democrats.
13/ I’ve heard some absurd arguments for how California really turned blue, but I won’t refute them here.
OK, I’ll refute one of them.
One argument is that the supermajority happened because conservatives fled after California started enacting liberal policies.
14/ How silly is that? Liberal policies couldn't happen until AFTER we had a supermajority.
Once we enacted liberal policies, some migration solidified California's majority.
False claim: Workers left CA because it became too expensive.
15/ We have a $12 minimum wage, lots of protection for workers, and a progressive tax code taxfoundation.org/which-states-h…
(meaning the rich pay more in taxes. Good for workers.).
Besides most of the workers weren't white.
I met a wealthy CEO who moved to South Carolina.
16/ This CEO didn't like the taxes. (South Carolina has a $7.25 minimum wage).
✔️False claim about how California turned blue, debunked
Here's California now⤵️. Rural, sparsely populated areas are still Republican.
17/ During the 2016 election—while watching Trump’s campaign ads featuring scary people coming over the border—I said, “This is the Pete Wilson 1994 campaign all over again.”
(I also remembered Wilson won)
The U.S. is now at the part of the plot where the subtext becomes text.
18/ Trump—like Prop. 187—has given people permission to say hateful, ugly things about immigrants and others.
Good question about why the current GOP didn't learn from CA.
Maybe history rhymes because human nature remains the same.
Psychologists @karen_stenner and @JonHaidt describe what they call the "Authoritarian Dynamic,” which goes like this . . .
@karen_stenner@JonHaidt . . . A certain percentage (about 1/3 across cultures) have what they call an authoritarian disposition. Those with this disposition prefer sameness and uniformity. Complexity (which includes diversity) scares them.
Important: they aren't dangerous or “racist” until . . .
@karen_stenner@JonHaidt . . . stirred up by demagogues like Trump (and Wilson) who deliberately arouse their fears.
As liberal democracy expands it naturally grows more diverse.
Growing diversity makes the situation ripe for a demagogue to arouse the fears of those with authoritarian dispositions. . .
@karen_stenner@JonHaidt . . . the authors conclude that the current right wing fervor isn't a momentary madness but a feature of liberal democracy. There will always be people who are not comfortable growing diversity.
We'll get out of this crisis by outvoting them. . .
@karen_stenner@JonHaidt . . . the long term solution is to find a way to deal more effectively with the authoritarians in our midsts to make them less dangerous.
I wonder if one way to begin is to view those being aroused to anger as victims. The evil ones are the demagogues stirring them up.
Putin knows how to wield disinformation and he knows that the United States is divided: A large portion of the population, including the most influential voices from a major political party, want the United States to emulate his Russia.
After Russia enacted anti-homosexual legislation, Pat Buchanan said Putin was “entering a claim that Moscow is the Godly city of today" because he was stamping out western evils like easy divorce and homosexuality. buchanan.org/blog/whose-sid…
2/
British right-winger Katie Hopkins, in an article in which she was interviewed with her friend Ann Coulter, said “Putin rocks.”
Katie Hopkins then went on to praise Russia as being “untouched by the myth of multiculturalism and deranged diversity."
Um . . . this isn't the defense Trump thinks it is.
Trump published a letter he received from Mazars dated (it looks like) 2014. He then summarized the letter.
#1: What Mazars said
#2: What Trump says Mazars said
Me = 🤦♀️
Does he think nobody can or will actually read it?
Mazars said, "Trump is responsible for preparing the financial statement."
Also Mazars does not "undertake to obtain or provide any assurance that there are no material modifications that should be made . . . "
Trump posts the letter and says Mazars "strongly states that all work was performed in accordance with professional standards and that there were "no material discrepancies in the financial statements."
. . . and concluded with thoughts about how social media brings out authoritarian instincts in large swaths of people who ordinarily would not be given to authoritarian impulses.
Indicting people and having juries return "not guilty" verdicts because there isn't evidence to prove each element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt may not accomplish what people think it will accomplish.
One reason I think social media is turning everyone into authoritarians: people don't read or think.
They see a headline and have a strong emotional reaction, which they Tweet and which then gets repeated by others, who are also not thinking . . .
1/
Political psychologists like @karen_stenner describe the authoritarian personality.
Those with an authoritarian disposition are averse to complexity. They reject nuance.
They prefer sameness and uniformity and have “cognitive limitations.”
(link in the next Tweet)
2/
See for example, "Authoritarianism is not a momentary madness,” which originally appeared in this book, an dwhich Stenner has now made available free on her website, here: ……e-4700-aaa9-743a55a9437a.filesusr.com/ugd/02ff25_370…
Timothy Snyder also talks about the danger of what he calls Internet Memes.