(thread) How California Turned Blue

Alternate title: California shows the way

California used to be Republican. We gave the nation Nixon and Reagan.

Republican candidates won CA in every presidential election between 1952 and 1988 except one⤵️
1/ By 1990, CA demographics were changing, with growing Asian and Spanish-speaking communities.
California's "Latino and Asian populations boomed in the 1990s”latimes.com/projects/la-po…

In the late 1980s and early 1990s came a candidate, Pete Wilson, stoking fears of immigrants.
2/ Here was one of Wilson’s 1994 reelection campaign ads:


“They keep coming . . .” begins the narrative. It's very Trumpian, almost like Trump modeled his own ads on Pete Wilsons'.

Pete Wilson won the election, helped by voter suppression in California.
3/ As an example of California suppression, polling sites “adversely impacted the ability of limited-English proficient voters to cast an effective and meaningful vote.”
gould.usc.edu/students/journ…

In plain talk: Non-English speakers weren't provided language assistances. . .
4/ . . . as required by the Voting Rights Act.

Law suits were filed to force CA to stop discriminating against non-English speaking citizens: gould.usc.edu/students/journ…

People here speak other languages: Spanish speakers were here before English speakers.
loc.gov/collections/ca…
5/ Chinese were among the first in San Francisco, having built most of the railroads.

Wilson’s signature law, Prop 187 ("Save our State”) denied undocumented persons non-emergency health care, access to schools, etc. It stoked anger against non-whites. jstor.org/stable/2547004…
6/ California has a history of that. We owned the Japanese internment camps in WWII.

187 fanned the flames.

Guess who was doing most of the backbreaking work picking crops in the fields? (Hint: They spoke Spanish.) They also paid taxes.

187 kept their children out of school.
7/ Proposition 187 created a stir—and heated arguments.

This was the part of the plot where the subtext became text.

People said things like, “Why should our taxes pay for schools and hospitals for them?"

(Um, maybe because they pay taxes, too? And they do important work?)
8/ I had a friend who taught school in a rural area. Many of her students had parents working the fields. Now they were to be denied access to classrooms, and even the nurses office.

Shocked into action by Proposition 187, liberals and minority communities organized.
9/ Voter drives were organized. Prop. 187 was successfully challenged in the courts. Lawyers formed voter protection orgs.

By 2000, CA was mostly Democratic, because of changing demographics combined with a backlash against the anti-immigration hate stirred up by 187.
10/ But all wasn’t well.

California had a 2/3 rule, which required 2/3 vote among lawmakers before anything could pass.
ocregister.com/2010/10/01/two…

This meant the GOP—now a minority—could hold up the works. The 2/3 rule gave them great power. They could be obstructionists.
11/ GOP lawmakers refused to pass budgets until they got what they wanted.

This was the part of the plot where the party that represents a minority of the population (who used to be the majority) had disproportionate power, and used that power to obstruct.

Sound familiar?
12/ To get anything done, California either had to:
💠get rid of the 2/3 rule,
💠let the Republicans shut everything down until they got their way, or,
💠work hard on elections until 2/3 of the elected representatives were Democrats.

Guess which happened? usnews.com/news/best-stat…
13/ I’ve heard some absurd arguments for how California really turned blue, but I won’t refute them here.

OK, I’ll refute one of them.

One argument is that the supermajority happened because conservatives fled after California started enacting liberal policies.
14/ How silly is that? Liberal policies couldn't happen until AFTER we had a supermajority.

Once we enacted liberal policies, some migration solidified California's majority.

False claim: Workers left CA because it became too expensive.
15/ We have a $12 minimum wage, lots of protection for workers, and a progressive tax code
taxfoundation.org/which-states-h…
(meaning the rich pay more in taxes. Good for workers.).
Besides most of the workers weren't white.

I met a wealthy CEO who moved to South Carolina.
16/ This CEO didn't like the taxes. (South Carolina has a $7.25 minimum wage).

✔️False claim about how California turned blue, debunked

Here's California now⤵️. Rural, sparsely populated areas are still Republican.
17/ During the 2016 election—while watching Trump’s campaign ads featuring scary people coming over the border—I said, “This is the Pete Wilson 1994 campaign all over again.”

(I also remembered Wilson won)

The U.S. is now at the part of the plot where the subtext becomes text.
18/ Trump—like Prop. 187—has given people permission to say hateful, ugly things about immigrants and others.

This is also the part in the plot where we see cruelty to children.
buzzfeednews.com/article/claudi…

The result is that people are shocked out of complacency.
19/ Maybe it takes the subtext becoming text for that to happen.

Democrats have always had larger numbers, but were never well organized. Now they’re getting organized.

Only 58% of the eligible voters voted in 2016.
Find those who lean liberal and get them to the polls.
20/ Adriane said⤵️
When I saved her tweet, I made an optimistic note to myself: "Maybe the universe is unfolding as it should."

How does the story end?

Look to California.

“History doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes.” (Attributed to Mark Twain)
All of my threads are also blog posts. You can read this one here: terikanefield-blog.com/how-california…

Good question about why the current GOP didn't learn from CA.

Maybe history rhymes because human nature remains the same.

Psychologists @karen_stenner and @JonHaidt describe what they call the "Authoritarian Dynamic,” which goes like this . . .
@karen_stenner @JonHaidt . . . A certain percentage (about 1/3 across cultures) have what they call an authoritarian disposition. Those with this disposition prefer sameness and uniformity. Complexity (which includes diversity) scares them.

Important: they aren't dangerous or “racist” until . . .
@karen_stenner @JonHaidt . . . stirred up by demagogues like Trump (and Wilson) who deliberately arouse their fears.

As liberal democracy expands it naturally grows more diverse.

Growing diversity makes the situation ripe for a demagogue to arouse the fears of those with authoritarian dispositions. . .
@karen_stenner @JonHaidt . . . the authors conclude that the current right wing fervor isn't a momentary madness but a feature of liberal democracy. There will always be people who are not comfortable growing diversity.

We'll get out of this crisis by outvoting them. . .
@karen_stenner @JonHaidt . . . the long term solution is to find a way to deal more effectively with the authoritarians in our midsts to make them less dangerous.

I wonder if one way to begin is to view those being aroused to anger as victims. The evil ones are the demagogues stirring them up.
@karen_stenner @JonHaidt Forgot to include my source for The Authoritarian Dynamic.

I rely on the essay, “Authoritarianism is Not a Momentary Madness, but an Eternal Dynamic within Liberal Democracies,” in this volume⤵️

@karen_stenner also has a book called "The Authoritarian Dynamic."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

Feb 21
Putin knows how to wield disinformation and he knows that the United States is divided: A large portion of the population, including the most influential voices from a major political party, want the United States to emulate his Russia.

1/
Some background:

After Russia enacted anti-homosexual legislation, Pat Buchanan said Putin was “entering a claim that Moscow is the Godly city of today" because he was stamping out western evils like easy divorce and homosexuality.
buchanan.org/blog/whose-sid…

2/
British right-winger Katie Hopkins, in an article in which she was interviewed with her friend Ann Coulter, said “Putin rocks.”

Katie Hopkins then went on to praise Russia as being “untouched by the myth of multiculturalism and deranged diversity."

rt.com/uk/429777-kati…

3/
Read 4 tweets
Feb 18
Trump lost in court THREE MORE TIMES today.

Trump tried to get all three of these cases⤵️ dismissed and lost. I analyzed one of the cases last April, Blassingame, here: (Transcript on my blog.)

He tends not to do well in court, where facts matter.

1/
The defendants made the following arguments (screenshot #1)

Trump also claims, among other things, that he has absolute immunity. (#2)

It turns out that the absolute immunity question isn't as easy as you might think (but Trump still lost).

2/
If you want to get caught up on one of the cases, my analysis from last April is here:terikanefield.com/blassingame-v-…

And here:

You can read the court's decision here: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

3/
Read 8 tweets
Feb 16
Um . . . this isn't the defense Trump thinks it is.

Trump published a letter he received from Mazars dated (it looks like) 2014. He then summarized the letter.

#1: What Mazars said
#2: What Trump says Mazars said

Me = 🤦‍♀️

Does he think nobody can or will actually read it?
Mazars said, "Trump is responsible for preparing the financial statement."

Also Mazars does not "undertake to obtain or provide any assurance that there are no material modifications that should be made . . . "
Trump posts the letter and says Mazars "strongly states that all work was performed in accordance with professional standards and that there were "no material discrepancies in the financial statements."

There is no "I don't know how to read" defense.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 13
For this week’s blog post, I edited and combined a few of my recent threads.

I started with a reading of the newly unredacted sections of the Mueller report, then talked about some of the responses on Twitter . . .

terikanefield.com/is-social-medi…
. . . and concluded with thoughts about how social media brings out authoritarian instincts in large swaths of people who ordinarily would not be given to authoritarian impulses.



It's too easy for truth to lose, and when truth loses, democracy loses.
Right. And not all "manipulators" are bad actors, but all people need to learn to evaluate sources.

Reflectively saying, "Professor X should know" is not how to do it. It takes more work. Falling in line is always easier than doing the work.

Read 4 tweets
Feb 12
I'm tired of the word "accountable." It's a weasel word. Don't say "accountable." Say what you mean.

Does "accountable" mean
🔹Lose elections?
🔹Go to prison?
🔹Lose a lawsuit?
🔹Be hated?

It would be nice if all the good people were rewarded and the bad people punished.
So you want to start indicting people and gather the evidence after they're indicted?

Or not worry about evidence?

There are rules of evidence, which means that the stuff you've read in newspapers and Tweets probably isn't admissible in court . . .
Indicting people and having juries return "not guilty" verdicts because there isn't evidence to prove each element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt may not accomplish what people think it will accomplish.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 12
One reason I think social media is turning everyone into authoritarians: people don't read or think.

They see a headline and have a strong emotional reaction, which they Tweet and which then gets repeated by others, who are also not thinking . . .

1/
Political psychologists like @karen_stenner describe the authoritarian personality.

Those with an authoritarian disposition are averse to complexity. They reject nuance.

They prefer sameness and uniformity and have “cognitive limitations.”

(link in the next Tweet)

2/
See for example, "Authoritarianism is not a momentary madness,” which originally appeared in this book, an dwhich Stenner has now made available free on her website, here: ……e-4700-aaa9-743a55a9437a.filesusr.com/ugd/02ff25_370…

Timothy Snyder also talks about the danger of what he calls Internet Memes.

3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(