Elie Mystal Profile picture
Aug 19, 2019 3 tweets 1 min read Read on X
The thing I find interesting about these white people getting all mad about the 1619 project is their implicit admission that learning about America's blood-soaked history of racism, oppression, and violence against black people would make people not like America.

YA THINK?
YES, white conservatives, if more people knew about the "original" concepts of America, "originalism" would be more widely viewed as the backdoor white supremacy ideology it's always been.
When your legal philosophy cannot withstand A NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE, that's a problem.
But, you know, I learned about America's history of slavery and oppression BEFORE I learned that white people venerated a document written by slavers that protected slavery.
That's probably how I became inoculated against @FedSoc. 1619 will allow others to get the vaccine.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Elie Mystal

Elie Mystal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ElieNYC

Jul 24
The biggest change I've noticed is that for the last three days, people are treating Trump appropriately: as an old, tired, racist and sexist man who is basically a failing comic with no new material trying to gin up a laugh by repeating his greatest hits.
Two things have always been true about Trump: He is a dangerous fascist and he is a pathetic clown. Those two true things often are seen at odds, because to laugh doesn't take him seriously, and to take him seriously misses how petty and uncreative he is.
But right now, I feel like everybody is coming together on these truths. We're not underestimating him, we're not dismissing him... but we're also not afraid of him, and we're not acting like he's cracked some kind of special political code.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 16
I know term limits and ethics sounds "less radical" to a lot of people than court expansion.

But, as I keep trying to tell you all, the Supreme Court gets to decide if term limits and ethics are constitutional. And so if you don't expand the court, these other plans will fail.
People still don't want to accept that the "radical" solution is the ONLY solution to get the more *moderate* changes they desire.

But if you tell John Roberts he has to leave office after 18 years, JOHN ROBERTS WILL SAY NO... and then what have you done?
The *only way* to get term limits is to appoint a majority of justices who think term limits are constitutional. And right now, I don't even know if there are *three* justices who think they're constitutional, much less the necessary five.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 2
I understand why Republicans are invested in downplaying the scope of the immunity decision. If people understood what just happened they might want to do something about the Supreme Court.

I really don't understand why Democrats are downplaying the scope though.
My only guess is that Democrats think that if people understood how much power the Supreme Court just handed to the President, they might expect their President to use it.

Since Biden's not going to use it, I guess there's value in telling people it didn't happen?
And along those lines I guess there's value in Democrats (falsely) telling people that there's still some kind of ridiculous chance Trump is still brought to justice, because even thought that is now a complete lie, people like to believe "the system is working."
Read 6 tweets
Jul 1
Look, I appreciate that people still want to find *some way* to think that Trump is going to be brought to justice for January 6.

But he WILL NOT be brought to justice. That part of the conversation is OVER. Trump won. People need to deal with that in their own way, but he WON.
The more relevant question is "NOW... WHAT ARE YOU PREPARED TO DO?" Trump won. He iced the bookeeper. He killed Sean Connery. NOW, WHAT ARE YOU PREPARED TO DO?
Are you prepared to go to the mattresses against the Supreme Court? Are you prepared to DEMAND court expansion as a condition for your next vote, in your next primary? Yes? Then we can talk. NO? Then there is no point.
Read 5 tweets
Jul 1
20 minutes out from Supreme Court decisions. It's been an honor covering these last gasps of democratic self government.
Just so you know, my process is to read the case syllabus, which usually tells you the holding, then read the first few paragraphs of the dissent, which tells you what the actual fight was about.
First case is Corner Post v. Federal Reserve. 6-3. Party lines. Barrett opinion, Jackson dissenting.
Republican justices say that people can challenge administrative regulations, essentially whenever they want, statute of limitations be damned.
Read 17 tweets
Jun 28
Back here on SCOTUS watch because as bad as things are they can always get worse and probably will in 20 minutes.
In case you missed it last night, here's my write up of yesterday's abortion ruling

thenation.com/article/societ…
I've started smoking again. :(
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(