Caleb Howe Profile picture
Aug 20, 2019 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
This is a nice thread from a human kindness perspective, but it highlights a big flaw in the green activist argument. The biggest proponents, when taking any non-green action, always have a "good reason" for doing it "this time."
For example, a big time activist flying to UN Climate Conference will stress the importance of his or her work to the cause, that it was a necessary evil in the broader war. Or in the Prince's case, a private jet is okay because of need and an offset. As if neutral = reduction.
It isn't about hypocrisy, no one cares about hypocrisy. The point is that they actually see modern conveniences exactly like everyone else does. As a convenience to used when you have a reason. When they think they can justify it, they do it. Just like everyone.
But most of what they propose involves you and I not being allowed to make that judgment call. That THIS time it's okay because I have to visit my parents. This time it's okay because electricity keeps me safe. Your reasons for owning your car or running AC don't matter.
Green activists always have a "reason" they think is good enough for not being "green." Everyone does. But they don't think YOUR reasons are good enough. And you aren't rich and powerful like they are.
I admire Elton John's commitment and caring here. And this doesn't make him bad or a hypocrite. He had a good reason. Which is exactly the point. He actually does have good reason for his carbon footprint.

But So. Do. I.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Caleb Howe

Caleb Howe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CalebHowe

Jan 1, 2023
I've made New Year's Resolutions for all of YOU.

1. Stop being the absolute worst.
Your New Year's Resolutions
2. You can't pull off that one thing you keep trying and you damn well know it so just stop. It's awkward for all of us, friend.
Your New Year's Resolutions
3. Read things, THEN comment on them. Or don't comment, that's fine, too.

Also your comments aren't half as clever as you want them to be, but they're twice as clever as your haters think.

Oh wait that last part was for me.
Read 10 tweets
Mar 26, 2020
Epidemiologist who headed Imperial College report team has drastically revised predictions, from potentially over 250k UK deaths to now fewer than 20k. Report was key in UK strategy.
newscientist.com/article/223857…
In part Ferguson credits measures taken to date such as "restrictions to people's movements," but that's not the sole takeaway. I hesitate to join the clamor of armchair expertise, but do think there are some important things to note here, as a person who reads/writes about news.
For one: Projections of course change as conditions/containment does, but this shift is more than *just* that. There were factors unaccounted for in initial alarming report, something pointed out contemporaneously [necsi.edu/review-of-ferg…] and which Ferguson here acknowledges.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 2, 2020
Ready to improve your outlook? Well for more perfect vision, you gotta read the good stuff. So here are some Must Follow Twitter accounts for 2020. Make them your first best resolution.

#Follow2020 - A Thread
Smart funny wise snarky witty savvy Keepin' it real & Smelling nice. THAT's what makes a 2020 Twitt-star. And it's what you get with my list. Starting with my
TOP 5 FOR #FOLLOW2020:

! @THATAllenCovert
! @Legallybae
! @Redsteeze
! @RobGeorge
! @JHolmsted

BUT WAIT THERE'S MORE..
@THATAllenCovert @legallybae @redsteeze @RobGeorge @JHolmsted Because what's a top five without five more? So rounding out my TOP 10 FOR #FOLLOW2020
! @Julio_Rosas11
! @WilliamShatner
! @JimGeraghty
! @EWErickson
! @CarolJSRoth
Read 13 tweets
Nov 4, 2019
There is NO question in my mind that @BrianStelter had no intention of lionizing or butching-up al-Baghdadi's rep by arguing Trump made up the claims of "crying and whimpering" by that terrorist dick. He was trying to make a point about Trump. buff.ly/2oGIFm4

HOWEVER...
@brianstelter It is beyond my reckoning how media folks don't know the secondary implications of some things they say, or of the grounds on which they choose to make a point. How they can't foresee the obvious and predictable fallout that will come from those choices.

I MEAN IMAGINE IF...
@brianstelter Imagine a reporter in 1945 being like, 'Soldiers claiming Hitler died afraid in his bunker don't actually know so because he blew his brains out before they got there so let's be real.' That reporter would be an idiot, but you'd also legit question his motives.

NOT TO MENTION...
Read 10 tweets
Nov 20, 2018
As usual is maddening how easy this is to understand and how much everyone refuses to understand it. There are two things happening here, and they aren't super hard to understand. There's the asshole administration and the asshole reporter.
The court said asshole administration revoked asshole Jim Acosta's press pass without due process. WH deemed him press, gave him a press pass, then they kicked him out without even being able to say who made the decision or on what grounds.
We want hostile, combative reporters. We **want** that. **You** want that. We want that because the press secretary of every single administration is a liar. Even the ones you like. Lying is their job. They show up to avoid answering, but give the appearance of being answerable.
Read 17 tweets
Apr 14, 2018
Jim Sciutto on CNN is not correct. "Mattis made very clear this is a one time shot, a limited one night strike purely on chemical weapons facilities. That is not what the President said moments before .. the President described a sustained US response..." This was not a conflict.
First of all, Mattis spoke militarily isolating this strike for the purposes of the briefing. He obviously didn't say "and never again shall another missile be launched." But more importantly he repeatedly emphasized the words "this wave" of strikes very precisely.
Additionally, what the President said was "We are prepared to sustain this response until the Syrian regime stops its use of prohibited chemical agents." Not, this is a sustained attack, but that we are prepared to sustain it.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(