Failing to accurately reflect your finances is punishable by up to a year in jail.
Making a false statement about it by attesting to its accuracy is punishable by up to five years in prison.
Trump tells Americans through that financial disclosure form that Aberdeen and Turnberry are worth more than $100 million between them.
But he tells British authorities they have almost $65 million more in debt than assets.
And there's Doonbeg in Ireland. Where he tells Irish authorities that the resort has lost $7.2 million over three years -- but has simultaneously told Americans that it has earned him $37.4 million in income.
Yes, Trump has frequently inflated his wealth -- recall when he claimed he was worth "in excess of TEN BILLION DOLLARS" -- but this information is supposed to be accurate, and he has claimed that it is, with his signature.
Supposedly being super rich and a genius businessman was one of his big selling points to voters when he ran for president.
Hours after this story was published and days after HuffPost sought comment, Trump Organization chief legal officer Alan Garten responded with the following:
He did not respond to follow up questions about the widely divergent claims regarding assets and income and why Trump failed to disclose the two loans.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The coup-attempting former president, who is also a court-adjudicated sexual abuser*, did not get two minutes into his speech before he introduced a new lie: That he had won Minnesota in 2020.
(Fact check: Uh, yeah. No.)
*Rape, in the common parlance, per a federal judge.
Trump is claiming that inflation was high only because of higher oil costs, which he blamed on Biden.
No.
Do people really believe this?
The number reason we had high inflation:
PEOPLE CONTINUED GETTING PAID DURING THE PANDEMIC EVEN THOUGH THEY WEREN'T WORKING, ALL PAID FOR BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
If Trump is elected, why do people believe he will ever leave?
This time he goes in having learned his lessons from Jan 6 — that he needs to fill the top military and nat sec positions with people personally loyal to him from the start, not just in the final weeks.
Reminder that if Trump wins, there is a 99 pct chance he will have a GOP run Senate.
Which will confirm whomever he wants for whatever job he wants. Count on it.
And if by chance the Senate refuses to confirm, say, Stephen Miller as attorney general or Steve Bannon as head of CIA, what’s to stop him from just letting them run those agencies as “acting”?
NEW -- Biden's running against a guy who tried to end our democracy last time and talks about ruling as an autocrat next time, so why isn't that the message all day, every day?
Well ... maybe because a scary number of Americans would be okay with that?
26% of Americans believe that an autocracy is a “very good” or “somewhat good” form of government, while another 28% think it’s only “somewhat bad.”
15% surveyed said they think military rule would be good, and another 23% believe it would be only “somewhat bad.”
Of course, Biden has devoted some half dozen speeches specifically to Trump's ongoing threat to democracy.
At the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2022. Independence Hall that September. Valley Forge this January.
COLLEAGUES -- If you were covering county government, and a deputy you had personally witnessed shoot an unarmed suspect in the back were running for sheriff, you'd mention that killing in every story, correct?
If you were covering state government, and someone who had been caught embezzling were running for treasurer, surely that background would make it into every story, yes?
So how is it possible to write a story about Donald Trump and not mention what he did in the weeks leading up to and on Jan. 6? He used the threat of violence, and then actual violence to alter the leadership of the government -- the very definition of a coup.
If America allows a person who attempted a violent coup on the ballot in contravention of the U.S. Constitution mainly because he and his followers are threatening to burn it all down, it seems like we’ve already given up on the rule of law and democracy.
This argument can be applied to pretty much every measure of accountability against Trump.
Can’t impeach him. His followers won’t accept it.
Can’t serve a search warrant. His followers won’t accept it.
Can’t prosecute him. His followers won’t accept it.
Btw, many, many smart people make the same argument that Axelrod makes. One of the smartest lawyers I know worries that bad-faith people will accuse all sorts of people for insurrection and bad-faith judges might agree with them, creating chaos in the absence of a bright line.