I agree with her. And I have no effing idea whether the news was true or not. STILL I support her sharing it.
Reasons:
@godavar@Shehla_Rashid 1. And biggest. What she says in that interview. If local media were functioning normally, she wouldn't have to rely on word of mouth news.
2. @Shehla_Rashid is not a journalist. She is a Kashmiri politician and probably the only notable one still out of jail. Different role.
@godavar@Shehla_Rashid 3. In a country where mainstream media isn't arrested for fake news, them running shows and polls about whether she should be arrested isn't even worthy of mention.
4. We have the government lying on record about Kashmir. No consequence. Remember the "no protest happened"?
@godavar@Shehla_Rashid 5. The stupidest person and the blindest bhakt ought to understand this much. If the Kashmiris were really happy about Modi's "masterstroke", BJP would be shoving mics in their faces and boosting their internet speeds, not doing a communication blackout.
@godavar@Shehla_Rashid 6. Did the incident happen? We don't know. BUT, it deserves to be put on record so that it can be investigated. Whether now, or in the distant future when we have a real govt. EVEN if it is false. Targeting hate and knee jerk denials and ZERO independent investigation = FAIL
@godavar@Shehla_Rashid 7. Does this mean we should believe it? I deliberated this too. I am waiting for *someone* trustworthy to dig into it after the noise it has generated. Whether true or false, the record needs to be clear, not wiped out.
@godavar@Shehla_Rashid 8. Lastly. Massive respect for @Shehla_Rashid standing literally alone right now as a Kashmiri politician. Tremendous pressure, entire fucking seas of trolls, hate, cunning "strategists" plotting how she can be targeted. She choses to do what she thinks she should. Does it.
@godavar@Shehla_Rashid The answer to Shehla's allegations is NOT an ignorant or malicious denial, but to allow methods of fact finding to exist, so that word of mouth does not have to be put on record without verification. Free the media. Allow independent enquiries.
@godavar@Shehla_Rashid And oh, even if this incident did not happen, there are a hundred others that did and have gone unreported. As the interview correctly points out, you can't just round up thousands of people, put them in jail, fly them out of country without any process without abuse of rights.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My parents worked hard all their lives. Factory worker and telephone operator. Believed that if they worked hard and saved wisely, they'd have comfortable old ages.
And then they invested money with an unscrupulous builder. My father died in a rented home, helpless to chase him.
My mother suffers from schizophrenia and anxiety and has moved two rented homes in her 70s, suffering from debilating anxiety each time.
Builder ignores RERA, has earned money on their life's earnings for 9 years now, no flat, no interest, no refund.
I find it hilarious when people speak of rule of law and political parties and issues that do nothing to fix their lives.
Due process takes expensive chasing. You need to SPEND to chase (not even secure) justice. And aged people have to spend the one thing they don't have. Time.
Feedback for YouTubers from someone who watches a LOT of YouTube videos.
I am not interested in you. I don't need a map to find subscribe. Think of it as a race to hook me with information before I scroll down to unsubscribe and then close tab. Intros make me scroll.
I still don't know how most YouTubers don't seem to have figured this out. Get to your content ASAP. That is the biggest thing you can do to retain me, not random info about yourself, your daily life, asking me to subscribe before I know you are any good, some random jingle, etc
What is your video about? Start talking about that. Like right now. If your talk is good, I'll be curious to know more about the person doing the talking. If you manage to irritate me with your self-importance, chances are I'll find someone with more clarity.
The 'appropriating' someone's voice argument is used so illogically sometimes that it is verging on fallacy.
A person speaking their own perspective is not appropriating anything.
It is an ad hominem attack that also adds false accusation to basically shut someone up.
Regardless of the subject. Even if it is a man speaking on women's rights, savarna speaking on caste discrimination against dalits, corporate rich fellow talking of poverty, whatever.
Own perspective is not appropriation.
OTOH, it is appropriation when someone not from that identity claims to speak what their reality "really" is. Particularly when it contradicts stated reality by that identity. This must be opposed.
The distinction is huge. One is interested participation. Other is suppression.
Ghar wapsi continues. Now with an attempt to help community (his followers) too find a good response to self harm.
Probably gets awkward when they are surprised at his U-turn
So it seems from people who do self harm being attention seekers, we have arrived at a place where Brumby is doing his best to find a better response to self harm that doesn't get him spanked.
Not bad for under a week, eh? Practically transforming as we watch.
Unfollow anyway.
All Brumby ever asked for as per today's version is that you don't glamorize self harm and he is still against wokes. Unclear why, since he appears headed there himself.