Today I went to the post office and had the dubious honour of meeting perhaps the most entitled loathsome prick I have encountered in person for many a month
/1
It was one of those post-offices-which-is-also-a-corner-shop things, because privatisation is always an improvement. Post office bit is a separate till to the main shop one. Because reasons, I guess
/2
I'm sure this two-till setup is more efficient if they have more staff than one women in her sixties working them both. Unfortunately, that was exactly what we had here. She was doing her best, running essentially 2 business single handed
/3
But as you can imagine, there was quite a queue for quite a while.
I had to send off several packages, so I knew it would take a while. So hung back for people with smaller items/jobs to go first.
/4
I'm not being Mr Altruism here, by the way. It's a personal preference. I'd rather wait a few more minutes to get served than spend the whole time sorting delivery instructions with several strangers staring daggers at the back of my head.
/5
So, older serving lady is flitting between the two tills, trying to keep up. At last, there's three of us customers left. Me, and older gent buying a newspaper, and... this wretched human.
/6
A description; chisel-jawed twentysomething man. False tan. Gelled hair with frosted tips. Tight pink shirt. Cargo shorts.
In my memory, he was wearing a cap with the word PRICK written on it, but I think that's just my brain retroactively editing things
/7
Anyway, Mr Cargo Shorts is standing in queue in front of the shop till, behind newspaper man. Newspaper man pays and leaves. Staff lady asks what he wants, he says he just needs a stamp for a letter
"Ah, you need to get that from the Post Office till"
Cue MASSIVE SIGH!
/8
You'd swear she said told him he needs to fill in 70 separate forms in a building across town, not walk LITERALLY two steps. Which he then does. Very begrudgingly.
It shouldn't be possible to visibly harrumph while walking two steps, but fair play he managed it
/9
Of course, now there's a problem. The Post Office till, that this guy needs to use, isn't empty. Someone's waiting to be served there. Namely, me. He's not going to like that, mister any-minor-inconvenience-is-a-crime-against-humanity-by-which-I-mean-me
/10
Lucky for him, I know how he only needs a stamp, so I let him go first. Even though I've been there at least 10 mins longer than him. That'll keep him happy, right?
Hah, Christ no!
/11
As he says to the cashier lady;
"Why couldn't you just walk to this till and serve me over there? It's ridiculous. Disgraceful. No point to it. You don't know what you're doing. I should have been served first" etc.
Reminder: HE *WAS* SERVED FIRST! Because I'm generous
/12
Thankfully, I said the cashier lady was a bit old. And, it turns out, a bit deaf. She was just nodding and smiling, saying "yes" and "I know" at random intervals, while he ranted pompously about the extra 3 seconds (max) her methods have added to his day
/13
If anything, given that she's a woman in her 60s and he's a chiselled 20ish young man, making her do all the moving would have made things much longer. I suspect his real outrage was due to being made to do something by a woman he's not attracted to. But that's just a guess
/14
Seriously though, cashier lady's deafness-induced lack of reaction to his angry entitled diatribe was the only thing keeping me from trying to slash his jugular with a paper cut from discount birthday card on a nearby shelf.
/15
Eventually he hands over his stamped letter for posting with every possible bad grace and stomps out, presumably to spread dick vibes into some other innocent person's life. And so, I finally get to sort my parcels out.
/16
I can't just let the whole thing pass without comment though. Staff like her must get enough shit as it is, I feel compelled to show some solidarity. So I say, loudly and clearly because of her hearing issues, "Wow, what was THAT guy's problem?"
/17
Her response, in fairness, was sublime. She looked me square in the eye and said:
"I'm not deaf. I was ignoring him. I'm used to his sort. He doesn't like the service he can go elsewhere. We'll manage without his 70 bastard pence"
My point is, not all heroes wear capes
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Daily Mail, 02/02/23
"Number of kids hospitalised by vaping QUADRUPLES in a year - as top expert fears crisis will only get worse"
That's obviously bad. If kids being hospitalised by something *quadruples* within a year, something must be done
But, wait a sec...
/2
Under the hood, there are a few things to consider
1. 'Kids' in this context actually means 'under 18s'. So while the mind goes to poor innocent primary school children, it also includes practically-adult late teens, the ones typically demonised by publications such as this.
/3
US states sue TikTok, claiming its addictive features harm youth mental health
On closer inspection, this case misuses neuroscience so severely that it seems like it could potentially make it illegal in the US for young people to have fun.
There are so many neuropsychological flaws in this case
E.g. filings state TikTok is designed to be "intentionally addictive". The conclusion here is that TikTok, a software construct, causes addiction.
Many would agree that this is valid. But you know who doesn't?...
/2
The AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION (APA)
The DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) lists all the disorders, and their diagnostic criteria, acknowledged by the APA. Various forms of addictions are in there. 'TikTok addiction' is not.
/3
At the fundamental, basic level, the ultrasocial human brain usually calibrates what it learns, figures out how the world works, based on feedback from other humans
Do a thing -> People get angry at you = Thing is bad
Do another ting -> People praise you = Thing is good
/2
This will be part of the reason why you get so much more conspiracy thinking now.
Before social media, you said "Guys, I actually think the Earth is flat", you get mocked in the pub by your mates, and your 'Derek Flat-Earth' for the foreseeable. So, you don't say it again.
/3
So, to celebrate the seven years of cat-based chaos our lives were immediately consumed by, here are seven of Pickle's greatest moments, in no particular order.
/1
That time when Pickle 'convinced' me that he was stuck on the roof, which led to much mockery and swearing.
I'm increasingly wary of such advice/guidelines/rules regarding phones for kids, as it all depends on two assumptions
- All parents know better about phones etc.
- All parents can be trusted to prioritise their child's wellbeing
But... neither of these are true
/1
Firstly, adults/parents being inherently (and illogically) suspicious of new tech and how it affects 'the children' is a phenomenon as old as civilisation.
And all this advice/guidelines seem both aimed at and shaped by such parents. This is not an evidence-based approach
/2
Not saying that countless parents aren't genuinely concerned, and may possibly be right to be concerned, but 'concerns' and 'possibilities' really aren't valid, robust grounds for the formation of rules that will directly impact countless young-people's lives.
/3
This popped up in my feed. I've not encountered it before. So, here's my professional analysis
WHAT IN THE NAME OF GIDDY FU*K IS THIS BULLSH*T??
Apparently parents of autistic kids are being targeted by such things, so here's everything wrong with it I can find
#Autism #ND
/1
The line "Considering stem cell therapy for #autism ?"
I've no idea whether or not anyone is considering that, as I've never heard of the concept before. But nobody *should* be considering that. Because it's not a thing. For so many reasons.
/2
Then there's... this
Basically, this is word salad. Throw enough credible or science-y sounding words together, and it adds up to complex gibberish. What's a 'global family'? Why not throw a 'quantum' or 'neuro' in there too. They might as well at this point.