Bar and Bench Profile picture
Aug 21, 2019 31 tweets 17 min read Read on X
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Day 9 hearing commences; CS Vaidyanathan resumes his arguments.

#AyodhyaHearing
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: CS Vaidyanathan citing precedents on adverse possession and ownership.

"There has never been any adverse possession in this case. Hindus have always expressed their desire to worship at this place", Vaidyanathan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Discussion now happening on how question of adverse possession will arise only if the property is alienable.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: The property itself being birthplace of Ram and a deity, it is res extra commercium. Thus, there is no question of anyone putting up a mosque there and claiming adverse possession, CS Vaidyanathan argues.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: There cannot be a destruction of an idol or temple. Even if there is no temple, the place itself has sanctity which will always remain, CS Vaidyanathan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: The property is res extra commercium and cannot be transferred, sold, alienated or dealt with in any manner, argues Vaidyanathan.

#AyodhyaHearing
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: In Hindu law unlike in Mohammaden law, a person in the capacity of trustee or Shabait cannot alienate the property, submits Vaidyanathan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Discussion happening now on whether property can be alienated and when the same can be done.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Whether a mosque is a juristic person or not?

Vaidyanathan citing 1940 judgment in Masjid Shahid Ganj case.

He says that judgment never answered that question conclusively, says Vaidyanathan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: This place due to the very fact that Ram was born here has divinity and needs to be treated differently, CS Vaidyanathan.
Ayodhya Hearing: Live Updates from Supreme Court [Day 9] #RamMandir #AyodhyaHearing #SupremeCourt

bit.ly/30o7Uak
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Bench rises for lunch, hearing to resume at 2 pm.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Bench resumes hearing.

CJI Ranjan Gogoi asks CS Vaidyanathan to close his arguments.

#AyodhyaHearing
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Their suits having been dismissed as time barred, how can they grant relief to them in my suit when most of the findings are in my favour, Vaidyanathan asks.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: The trial was by a Full Bench of High Court.

Supreme Court should be circumspect while interfering with the findings of High Court, Vaidyanathan concludes arguments.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Senior Advocate PN Mishra commences arguments.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: PN Mishra is making submissions on behalf of Ram Janmabhoomi Punaruddhar Samiti.

#AyodhyaHearing
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Are you party to the suit, asks CJI Ranjan Gogoi.

"I am. I am defendant no. 20 in suit 4", replies PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: I will argue that based on our doctrine, tenets and beliefs, it is a temple. I will start with Atharva Veda, submits PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: It is our case that Babur never built a mosque there and Hindus have been worshipping at that place all along, submits PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: PN Mishra relying on Skanda Purana, Valmiki Ramayana to argue on exact location of Ram Janmasthan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Hindu texts as the basis for faith is not disputed; what we really need are objective parameters, documentary evidence for temple, Bench tells PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Bench is more interested in objective evidence than references to scriptures.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Justice Chandrachud asks what is the relevance of who built the mosque - be it Babur or somebody else?

Was there a mosque? Thats what is relevant, Justice Chandrachud to PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Bench says they will hear PN Mishra later.

Now SC moves on to VN Sinha who is appearing for President of Hindu Mahasabha.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Sinha raising the point of title claimed by Muslims.

Once territory of Awadh was annexed to British empire, all structures raised on the soil also got annexed to Britain, Sinha says.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Bench objects, says territory annexed means sovereignty is lost; Does not mean all structures in the territory is vested with the empire.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Sinha says he did not think his turn to argue would come today.

"I thought I would be asked to argue at the very end", says Sinha.

"Is anybody in suit no. 5 ready to argue", asks CJI Ranjan Gogoi.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Now Senior Advocate Ranjit Kumar making arguments for plaintiff Gopal Singh who died in 1986 and his son has been substituted.

He is plaintiff in suit no. 1, defendant no. 1 in suit no. 4 and defendant no. 1 in suit 5.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: My case is that I am a worshipper, submits Ranjit Kumar.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Bench rises for the day.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Dec 3
Parliament Questions
Sasmit Patra asked about the number of cases filed, disposed and pending before DRTs.

The Government responded that 1,78,172 cases are pending before Debt Recovery Tribunals, along with 66,876 SARFAESI applications, as of 14 November 2025. Image
Patra asked the Government for forum-wise data on cases filed, disposed and pending before the NCLT, DRTs, SARFAESI recovery forums and erstwhile BIFR.

NCLT:
As of 30 September 2025, the National Company Law Tribunal has:
53,727 total cases filed

46,725 cases disposed

7,002 cases pending
Budget Allocation & Utilisation (NCLT vs DRT):

FY 2022–23:
NCLT: ₹86.80 cr allocated; ₹86.27 cr utilised
DRT: ₹155.72 cr allocated; ₹154.79 cr utilised

FY 2023–24:
NCLT: ₹108.37 cr allocated; ₹99.85 cr utilised
DRT: ₹171.95 cr allocated; ₹175.55 cr utilised

FY 2024–25:
NCLT: ₹135.87 cr allocated; ₹122.59 cr utilised
DRT: ₹212.07 cr allocated; ₹183.63 cr utilised
Read 5 tweets
Dec 2
Supreme Court to resume hearing today pleas by Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and other accused seeking bail in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case.

Bench: Justices Aravind Kumar and NV Anjaria

#SupremeCourt #UmarKhalid Image
Sr. Adv. Abhishek Manu Singhvi (for Gulfisha Fatima): I have been in jail for just under 6 years. There is a chargesheet filed on 16.9.2020 but as if it’s a ritual of chargesheets, the supplementary chargesheets are filed continuously… till now we have got 4 supplementary and 1 main. The arrest was in 2020. Even after 2023, the delay is sad, astonishing, and unprecedented.
Singhvi: I seek parity, the high court keeps it pending. Then a new bench takes over. Then the appeals were listed with 8 other Co accused. Then it was released from that bench… whatever reasons, let’s not go into that. Then comes the impugned judgement.
Read 72 tweets
Nov 29
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant will deliver the inaugural address at the O.P. Jindal Global University’s international convention on judicial independence today marking the launch of IMAANDAAR (Moot academy) and a discussion on the Kesavananda Bharati verdict with AG R. Venkataramani, SG Tushar Mehta and a host of other Supreme Court judges #SupremeCourtImage
Supreme Court Justices PS Narasimha, PK Mishra, Aravind Kumar and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta at the event #SupremeCourt Image
Justice Sanjay Karol and Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra arrive #SupremeCourt @Luthra_Sidharth Image
Read 32 tweets
Nov 28
Supreme Court hears plea concerning OBC reservation for Maharashtra polls

Sr Adv Indira Jaising: We dispute the Banthia commission report because the motive was to reduce the OBC count and only surnames were taken into account.

CJI Surya Kant: We have today a bench mark .. the Banthia commission. We have also not read it but may have to look at critically nowImage
Jaising: The contempt is disguised way to seek review.

CJI: here order is construed or misconstrued is the contention.
CJI: We will hear this matter in 3 judge benches combination by second week of January

Sr Adv Vikas Singh: then let there be no elections till then
Read 7 tweets
Nov 27
Supreme Court hears the Ranveer Allahabadia case:

Adv Prashant Bhushan: I appear for a disabled professor. This is a very important issue on free speech and how such stakeholders need to be taken into confidence while having consultations

SG Tushar Mehta: Right now we are not dealing with obscenity. But with perversity. Something needs to be done on user generated content. One can have his own @YouTube channel and....we cannot do everything and anything under the garb of free expression

CJI Surya Kant: It is strange that I create my own channel and keep doing things without being accountable. Yes free speech has to be protected ..suppose there is a program with adult content.. there can be warning in advance with parental control.Image
AG R Venkataramani: Ministry of Information and Broadcasting is proposing to have a meeting. They will do everything possible to have a public consultation

CJI: if some provisions need to be incorporated or something needs amendment

SG: yea being considered. I had a word with the minister.
Indian Broadcast and Digital Foundation counsel: Age classification and warnings are in place. There are Digital Media Ethics Code. This code is subjudice.. it was challenged before various HCs and union filed a transfer and it was transferred to Delhi HC and it is to be heard on January 8. This concerns content it Netflix etc. There are 27 petitions. There are Broadcast complaint commission headed by Justice Gita Mittal. Here the category is different. Here comments were made in a user generated content. Ministry has filed a note saying UGC guidelines they are thinking about.

CJI: what is the single instance of penalty or action ? Self styled bodies will not help..some autonomous bodies are free from the influence from those who are exploit all of this and the state also... as a regulatory measure.
Read 23 tweets
Nov 26
Supreme Court to hear petitions challenging SIR in Bihar, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, West Bengal and Puducherry
#SIR #SupremeCourt Image
CJI Kant: Tamil Nadu SIR matter will be on Monday. Kerala SIR issue is for deferment of SIR since local body elections are on

Sr Adv Rakesh Dwivedi: Plea was first before Madras HC. State election commission had said they are not facing any issues. ECI and SEC are coordinating. 99 percent voters have got forms, more than 50 percent are digitised.

CJI Kant: File separate status report for Kerala SIR.
Sr Adv Raju Ramachandran: Tamil Nadu issue is important. Cut off date is December 4.

Sr Adv Rakesh Dwivedi: Have it on 5th November.

Sr Adv Ramamchandran: This is too late.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(