#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: CS Vaidyanathan citing precedents on adverse possession and ownership.
"There has never been any adverse possession in this case. Hindus have always expressed their desire to worship at this place", Vaidyanathan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Discussion now happening on how question of adverse possession will arise only if the property is alienable.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: The property itself being birthplace of Ram and a deity, it is res extra commercium. Thus, there is no question of anyone putting up a mosque there and claiming adverse possession, CS Vaidyanathan argues.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: There cannot be a destruction of an idol or temple. Even if there is no temple, the place itself has sanctity which will always remain, CS Vaidyanathan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: The property is res extra commercium and cannot be transferred, sold, alienated or dealt with in any manner, argues Vaidyanathan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: In Hindu law unlike in Mohammaden law, a person in the capacity of trustee or Shabait cannot alienate the property, submits Vaidyanathan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Discussion happening now on whether property can be alienated and when the same can be done.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Their suits having been dismissed as time barred, how can they grant relief to them in my suit when most of the findings are in my favour, Vaidyanathan asks.
"I am. I am defendant no. 20 in suit 4", replies PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: I will argue that based on our doctrine, tenets and beliefs, it is a temple. I will start with Atharva Veda, submits PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: It is our case that Babur never built a mosque there and Hindus have been worshipping at that place all along, submits PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: PN Mishra relying on Skanda Purana, Valmiki Ramayana to argue on exact location of Ram Janmasthan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Hindu texts as the basis for faith is not disputed; what we really need are objective parameters, documentary evidence for temple, Bench tells PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Bench is more interested in objective evidence than references to scriptures.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Justice Chandrachud asks what is the relevance of who built the mosque - be it Babur or somebody else?
Was there a mosque? Thats what is relevant, Justice Chandrachud to PN Mishra.
Once territory of Awadh was annexed to British empire, all structures raised on the soil also got annexed to Britain, Sinha says.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Bench objects, says territory annexed means sovereignty is lost; Does not mean all structures in the territory is vested with the empire.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Sinha says he did not think his turn to argue would come today.
"I thought I would be asked to argue at the very end", says Sinha.
"Is anybody in suit no. 5 ready to argue", asks CJI Ranjan Gogoi.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Now Senior Advocate Ranjit Kumar making arguments for plaintiff Gopal Singh who died in 1986 and his son has been substituted.
He is plaintiff in suit no. 1, defendant no. 1 in suit no. 4 and defendant no. 1 in suit 5.
Parliament Questions
Sasmit Patra asked about the number of cases filed, disposed and pending before DRTs.
The Government responded that 1,78,172 cases are pending before Debt Recovery Tribunals, along with 66,876 SARFAESI applications, as of 14 November 2025.
Patra asked the Government for forum-wise data on cases filed, disposed and pending before the NCLT, DRTs, SARFAESI recovery forums and erstwhile BIFR.
NCLT:
As of 30 September 2025, the National Company Law Tribunal has:
53,727 total cases filed
Supreme Court to resume hearing today pleas by Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and other accused seeking bail in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case.
Bench: Justices Aravind Kumar and NV Anjaria
#SupremeCourt #UmarKhalid
Sr. Adv. Abhishek Manu Singhvi (for Gulfisha Fatima): I have been in jail for just under 6 years. There is a chargesheet filed on 16.9.2020 but as if it’s a ritual of chargesheets, the supplementary chargesheets are filed continuously… till now we have got 4 supplementary and 1 main. The arrest was in 2020. Even after 2023, the delay is sad, astonishing, and unprecedented.
Singhvi: I seek parity, the high court keeps it pending. Then a new bench takes over. Then the appeals were listed with 8 other Co accused. Then it was released from that bench… whatever reasons, let’s not go into that. Then comes the impugned judgement.
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant will deliver the inaugural address at the O.P. Jindal Global University’s international convention on judicial independence today marking the launch of IMAANDAAR (Moot academy) and a discussion on the Kesavananda Bharati verdict with AG R. Venkataramani, SG Tushar Mehta and a host of other Supreme Court judges #SupremeCourt
Supreme Court Justices PS Narasimha, PK Mishra, Aravind Kumar and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta at the event #SupremeCourt
Justice Sanjay Karol and Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra arrive #SupremeCourt @Luthra_Sidharth
Supreme Court hears plea concerning OBC reservation for Maharashtra polls
Sr Adv Indira Jaising: We dispute the Banthia commission report because the motive was to reduce the OBC count and only surnames were taken into account.
CJI Surya Kant: We have today a bench mark .. the Banthia commission. We have also not read it but may have to look at critically now
Jaising: The contempt is disguised way to seek review.
CJI: here order is construed or misconstrued is the contention.
CJI: We will hear this matter in 3 judge benches combination by second week of January
Sr Adv Vikas Singh: then let there be no elections till then
Adv Prashant Bhushan: I appear for a disabled professor. This is a very important issue on free speech and how such stakeholders need to be taken into confidence while having consultations
SG Tushar Mehta: Right now we are not dealing with obscenity. But with perversity. Something needs to be done on user generated content. One can have his own @YouTube channel and....we cannot do everything and anything under the garb of free expression
CJI Surya Kant: It is strange that I create my own channel and keep doing things without being accountable. Yes free speech has to be protected ..suppose there is a program with adult content.. there can be warning in advance with parental control.
AG R Venkataramani: Ministry of Information and Broadcasting is proposing to have a meeting. They will do everything possible to have a public consultation
CJI: if some provisions need to be incorporated or something needs amendment
SG: yea being considered. I had a word with the minister.
Indian Broadcast and Digital Foundation counsel: Age classification and warnings are in place. There are Digital Media Ethics Code. This code is subjudice.. it was challenged before various HCs and union filed a transfer and it was transferred to Delhi HC and it is to be heard on January 8. This concerns content it Netflix etc. There are 27 petitions. There are Broadcast complaint commission headed by Justice Gita Mittal. Here the category is different. Here comments were made in a user generated content. Ministry has filed a note saying UGC guidelines they are thinking about.
CJI: what is the single instance of penalty or action ? Self styled bodies will not help..some autonomous bodies are free from the influence from those who are exploit all of this and the state also... as a regulatory measure.
Supreme Court to hear petitions challenging SIR in Bihar, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, West Bengal and Puducherry
#SIR #SupremeCourt
CJI Kant: Tamil Nadu SIR matter will be on Monday. Kerala SIR issue is for deferment of SIR since local body elections are on
Sr Adv Rakesh Dwivedi: Plea was first before Madras HC. State election commission had said they are not facing any issues. ECI and SEC are coordinating. 99 percent voters have got forms, more than 50 percent are digitised.
CJI Kant: File separate status report for Kerala SIR.
Sr Adv Raju Ramachandran: Tamil Nadu issue is important. Cut off date is December 4.