#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: CS Vaidyanathan citing precedents on adverse possession and ownership.
"There has never been any adverse possession in this case. Hindus have always expressed their desire to worship at this place", Vaidyanathan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Discussion now happening on how question of adverse possession will arise only if the property is alienable.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: The property itself being birthplace of Ram and a deity, it is res extra commercium. Thus, there is no question of anyone putting up a mosque there and claiming adverse possession, CS Vaidyanathan argues.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: There cannot be a destruction of an idol or temple. Even if there is no temple, the place itself has sanctity which will always remain, CS Vaidyanathan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: The property is res extra commercium and cannot be transferred, sold, alienated or dealt with in any manner, argues Vaidyanathan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: In Hindu law unlike in Mohammaden law, a person in the capacity of trustee or Shabait cannot alienate the property, submits Vaidyanathan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Discussion happening now on whether property can be alienated and when the same can be done.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Their suits having been dismissed as time barred, how can they grant relief to them in my suit when most of the findings are in my favour, Vaidyanathan asks.
"I am. I am defendant no. 20 in suit 4", replies PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: I will argue that based on our doctrine, tenets and beliefs, it is a temple. I will start with Atharva Veda, submits PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: It is our case that Babur never built a mosque there and Hindus have been worshipping at that place all along, submits PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: PN Mishra relying on Skanda Purana, Valmiki Ramayana to argue on exact location of Ram Janmasthan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Hindu texts as the basis for faith is not disputed; what we really need are objective parameters, documentary evidence for temple, Bench tells PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Bench is more interested in objective evidence than references to scriptures.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Justice Chandrachud asks what is the relevance of who built the mosque - be it Babur or somebody else?
Was there a mosque? Thats what is relevant, Justice Chandrachud to PN Mishra.
Once territory of Awadh was annexed to British empire, all structures raised on the soil also got annexed to Britain, Sinha says.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Bench objects, says territory annexed means sovereignty is lost; Does not mean all structures in the territory is vested with the empire.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Sinha says he did not think his turn to argue would come today.
"I thought I would be asked to argue at the very end", says Sinha.
"Is anybody in suit no. 5 ready to argue", asks CJI Ranjan Gogoi.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Now Senior Advocate Ranjit Kumar making arguments for plaintiff Gopal Singh who died in 1986 and his son has been substituted.
He is plaintiff in suit no. 1, defendant no. 1 in suit no. 4 and defendant no. 1 in suit 5.
Supreme Court hears applications seeking review of its Vanashakti judgement.
In the judgement, the Court had barred the Central government from granting retrospective environmental clearance.
Bench: CJI BR Gavai, Justices K Vinod Chandran and Ujjal Bhuyan
Sr. Adv. Kapil Sibal: the OM refers to 2 powers. It was passed in pursuance of the order of the NGT. There is apparently an error.
Sibal: all disputes with respect to violations can be dealt by the tribunal. None of this was pointed out to the bench.
CJI: it appears from the NGT order that despite violation the violators continued with impunity. That’s why these directions were there.
Sibal: they said it projects are permissible then only it will be done. If they are impermissible there will be demolition. many of these projects were permissible ones. Like the airport. Central government passed the OM in pursuance to the NGT order.
Supreme Court hears plea seeking probe into alleged financial irregularities and fund diversion by Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd and its promoters.
Bench: Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan, and NK Singh
#SupremeCourt #Indiabulls
Adv Prashant Bhushan (appearing in person)
Sr. Adv. Harish Salve (for Sameer Gehlaut, founder and chairman of India Bulls): this is such blackmail litigation. If an investigation is needed it is into these NGOs. All the agencies have filed affidavits and nothing has come out. What is this kind of witch hunting. Who is this stranger. I am objecting the maintainability of this petition.
Justice Kant: CBI says ED may continue investigation into IHFL’s affairs. We want to know what is the ED’s stand on it. We will hear you on maintaining Mr. Salve. Don’t worry.
Supreme Court to shortly hear a batch of petitions challenging the validity of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar’s electoral rolls, which was conducted ahead of the 2025 Assembly elections #BiharSIR #SupremeCourt
Bench to assemble shortly. Hearing will start at 2pm.
Adv Prashant Bhushan: after the final roll has come out we have been able to do some analysis. We have been able to access the 2003 guidelines for SIR. And another 2016 guideline where they said how to remove bogus voters etc. we have prepared written submissions.
Justice Sachin Datta, Delhi HC judge: Mediation is no longer the poor cousin of Arbitration or litigation and is becoming the prefered one. Mediated justice is also faster.
6600 cases were referred for mediation in Delhi. 3,400 cases were settled. Success rate was more than 50 percent and at 34 percent at pre litigation stage. As far as Delhi is concerned the record is very satisfactory. Lawyer mediators have been the unsung heroes and heroines in this.
Justice Surya Kant: We cannot compare arbitration and mediation fees. There is a lot of expectation from this new mediation act and it is a ray of hope for structured mediation..I have also gone through the provisions.. but we have to see if the act meets with all the expectations or there are some legislative lacunae which is left behind.
Justice M Sundar: Sections 49 and 50 deals with mediation where the state is a party. Section 50 is notified whereas section 49 has not been notified. Section 49 talks about prior consent by competent authority. So that section needs to be notified as soon as possible. Sections 27 and 28 constitute the sole of the statute. Section 28 gives it the status of a civil court decree. Sections 27 and 28 also needs to be notified. Sections 58 to 65 has to also kick in.
CJI BR Gavai along with other dignatories to shortly speak at the inaugral session of the 2nd National Mediation Conference, 2025.
AG Orissa Pitambar Acharya reads the message from PM Modi: it is noteworthy that the conference seeks to promote mediation as ADR at various stages of litigation. Our nation has had a culture of mediation that blends tradition and formal systems of justice delivery. When such processes are incorporated into modern systems they strengthen access to justice while preserving local harmony. Alongside modernisation and legal reforms it reflects India’s blend of timeless traditions of justice with 21st century lens.
Acharya: mediation provides quick affordable settlements easing judicial burden and ensuring timely justice. The participation of renowned legal luminaries and global mediators will infuse the deliberations with deep expertise and real world perspectives. Justice is at the core of building a fair, inclusive and self reliant nation. India’s journey towards Viksit Bharat by 2027 needs ease of justice to be filled by every citizen. The importance of mediation acquires a crucial place in this endeavour.
Supreme Court hears case involving the custodial death of a 25-year-old tribal youth.
Bench: Justices BV Nagarathna and R Mahadevan
Yesterday, the Court had come down heavily on the CBI and the State for not being able to arrest the two accused officers who are absconding despite a categorical order in May directing their arrest.
Counsel for MP: the salary has been stopped for then since May 2025. As far as suspension is concerned, the order was received by SP and suspension order has been passed. As on day they have been suspended from their services.
Justice Nagarathna: we want the majesty of this Court must be upheld. State Government cannot ignore the directions (for arrest)