#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: CS Vaidyanathan citing precedents on adverse possession and ownership.
"There has never been any adverse possession in this case. Hindus have always expressed their desire to worship at this place", Vaidyanathan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Discussion now happening on how question of adverse possession will arise only if the property is alienable.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: The property itself being birthplace of Ram and a deity, it is res extra commercium. Thus, there is no question of anyone putting up a mosque there and claiming adverse possession, CS Vaidyanathan argues.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: There cannot be a destruction of an idol or temple. Even if there is no temple, the place itself has sanctity which will always remain, CS Vaidyanathan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: The property is res extra commercium and cannot be transferred, sold, alienated or dealt with in any manner, argues Vaidyanathan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: In Hindu law unlike in Mohammaden law, a person in the capacity of trustee or Shabait cannot alienate the property, submits Vaidyanathan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Discussion happening now on whether property can be alienated and when the same can be done.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Their suits having been dismissed as time barred, how can they grant relief to them in my suit when most of the findings are in my favour, Vaidyanathan asks.
"I am. I am defendant no. 20 in suit 4", replies PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: I will argue that based on our doctrine, tenets and beliefs, it is a temple. I will start with Atharva Veda, submits PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: It is our case that Babur never built a mosque there and Hindus have been worshipping at that place all along, submits PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: PN Mishra relying on Skanda Purana, Valmiki Ramayana to argue on exact location of Ram Janmasthan.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Hindu texts as the basis for faith is not disputed; what we really need are objective parameters, documentary evidence for temple, Bench tells PN Mishra.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Bench is more interested in objective evidence than references to scriptures.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Justice Chandrachud asks what is the relevance of who built the mosque - be it Babur or somebody else?
Was there a mosque? Thats what is relevant, Justice Chandrachud to PN Mishra.
Once territory of Awadh was annexed to British empire, all structures raised on the soil also got annexed to Britain, Sinha says.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Bench objects, says territory annexed means sovereignty is lost; Does not mean all structures in the territory is vested with the empire.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Sinha says he did not think his turn to argue would come today.
"I thought I would be asked to argue at the very end", says Sinha.
"Is anybody in suit no. 5 ready to argue", asks CJI Ranjan Gogoi.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Now Senior Advocate Ranjit Kumar making arguments for plaintiff Gopal Singh who died in 1986 and his son has been substituted.
He is plaintiff in suit no. 1, defendant no. 1 in suit no. 4 and defendant no. 1 in suit 5.
Supreme Court hears a batch of pleas by women Army SSC officers seeking permanent commission, alleging denial on grounds of discrimination and arbitrary decisions by the IAF.
Bench: Justices Surya Kant, Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, and Justice NK Singh
Senior Advocate Menaka Guruswamy argues that this is a rigorous selection process consisting of several stages, which precludes the argument that women officers are less suitable. Stage one is the screening test with Officer Intelligence Ratings, followed by further stages... both women and men undergo the same competition, which is identical for both.
Justice NK Singh asks Advocate Guruswamy whether men and women undergo training together as a mixed group.
Advocate Guruswamy replies that yes, they undergo training together for around 11 months.
Supreme Court hears a PIL concerning caste discrimination, harassment, and institutional failure in higher educational institutions.
Bench: Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi
#SupremeCourt #UGC
SG Tushar Mehta: we have published draft regulations. 391 suggestions and inputs were received. Thereafter an expert committee was formed. They have gone into it… Some of the suggestions have been found to be favourable. And a report has been filed before a UGC.
Sr. Adv. Indira Jaising: this was filed in 2019. Since then we have had much water flowing under the bridge. Several people have committed suicide. We are already aware that draft regulations have been published. We made the suggestions. 2 coordinate benches of this Court have attempted to address this issue as well.
Supreme Court to resume hearing today pleas challenging the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar.
Bench: Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi
#SupremeCourt #BiharSIR #BiharElections2025
On the last hearing, the Court had directed the ECI to issue a formal notice stating that Aadhaar will be accepted as an identity proof document for the inclusion of a voter to the revised voters' list being prepared as part of the exercise.
Justice Kant to Sr. Adv. Rakesh Dwivedi (for ECI): what's the current status? Should we not wait for actual assessment as to how many individuals left out?
Sr. Adv. Gopal Sankarnarayanan: the ECI is moving ahead with the other states. Since we had to a large degree addressed on the legal aspect just give us a date today. If it is found that this is a perversion of a constitutional scheme we may press that this may not continue. There is no question of proceeding with other states and establishing fait accompli. An actual date may be given.
Supreme Court hears a plea in connection with the pendency of criminal trials against alleged gangsters in the National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi.
Bench: Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymala Bagchi
In July 2025, Apex Court expressed serious concern over the pendency, noting that there exists a significant delay between the framing of charges and commencement of evidence in these cases.
Justice Surya Kant: You need to summon some Secretary level officers and let head of forces be all there— NIA, CBI, ED etc...hold a meeting. Something needs to be done.
Supreme Court Judges Justices Surya Kant and KV Viswanathan, along with Prof (Dr) C Raj Kumar, Founding Vice Chancellor of O.P. Jindal Global University, to participate in the launch of Commentary on Mediation Act, 2023 by Advocate-on-Record Nandini Gore. The book is published by Mohan Law House
The guests unveil the book
Gore now speaks about the book. She says "This book is a reflection of my belief that mediation is more than an alternate to litigation. My own journey began years ago in a case, I experienced first hand the power of mediation."