Most people are missing the actual point of this article. It isn't to seriously advocate for cannibalism.
Look at the argument: rationally, LOGICALLY, if you're pro-eating meat, there's no argument against eating babies, or the dead
This is just a setup for the conclusion:
Look at the argument: rationally, LOGICALLY, if you're pro-eating meat, there's no argument against eating babies, or the dead
This is just a setup for the conclusion:
https://twitter.com/Newsweek/status/1164031903382552576
Things are so dire we could LOGICALLY eat humans. But that's disgusting haha, we totally agree we should never do that haha
So just stop eating meat and eat bugs instead! Whew. Isn't that so much nicer than the option we just used to shock your sensibilities with?
So just stop eating meat and eat bugs instead! Whew. Isn't that so much nicer than the option we just used to shock your sensibilities with?
Some in our sphere have argued this perverse new push of "eat the crickets, bigot" is just clickbait, basic PR for various Silicon Valley bug-farm startups
Well, there isn't any of that here. Is there.
It's just propaganda for why you need to accept a declining standard of life
Well, there isn't any of that here. Is there.
It's just propaganda for why you need to accept a declining standard of life
I like how they slide in "there's also the prospect of cultured meat technology." The promise is, obvs, that things will get worse for you in the short term
But don't worry. Your Silicon Valley saviors will have you eating burgers again in no time
You just have to trust them!
But don't worry. Your Silicon Valley saviors will have you eating burgers again in no time
You just have to trust them!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
