• Date: 11 March 2011
• Richter intensity: 9.0
• Duration: 6 min
• Depth: 24.4 km
• Epicentre: 130 km east of Sendai City.
• Waves Height: up to 14 m
• Mortality: 15,898 (1,614 in Fukushima)
Sources: from [1] to [7]
2. Radiation Exposure
• The doses to the general public are generally low or very low.
• No radiation-related deaths or acute diseases have been observed among the workers and general public exposed to radiation from the accident
1. Performance indicators are provided for today, 2020, 2035 and 2050. 2. No system-level assessment.
Evaluated technologies :
• Large hydro (LHP)
• Small hydro (SHP)
• Wind (onshore & offshore)
• Solar photovoltaics (PV)
• Biomass
• Deep geothermal
• Wave and tidal
• Solar thermal (CSP)
• Nuclear
• Natural gas & coal
• Fuel cells
• Novel technologies
TECHNICAL POTENTIALS
Here are shown
1. the power generation mix in Switzerland in 2015
2. estimated “exploitable potentials“ for additional el. generation (w.r.t. 2015) with different fuels and technologies in Switzerland and for el. imports from generation abroad in 2050.
This might be a very powerful moral principle, ideological premise or even a sacred dogma, but I honestly find very hard to argue that it's a techno-scientifically informed conclusion of a logically consistent ethical argument.
3. "How can we quickly convert the energy supply of houses, cities and entire countries to 100% clean sources such as wind, water and sun?"
Let's be clear. First of all: by "X is renewable" I usually mean "X has no fuel costs".