Thinking about why white evangelicals/conservatives almost always ignore/avoid the black middle-class: They both seem ignorant of the Washington v. DuBois debate & focus on F. Douglass & MLK.🤷🏾♂️ Result: they defacto chose the “Atlanta Compromise” approach. sites.psu.edu/betterthanjord…
The ATL Compromise said blacks would work & submit to white political rule, while whites guaranteed that blacks would receive basic education & due process in law. Blacks would not focus their demands on equality, integration, or justice, & whites would fund charities, churches
The Atlanta Compromise approach conflates being black with being poor and needing white uplift through “urban church planting,” programs focused on “inner-city” blacks, etc. while by-passing building black human flourishing alongside the educated black-middle class (DuBois).
Consequence: white Conservatives/evangelical can’t diversify their leadership ranks because they are not connected to pipelines that largely produce black leaders. Millions of dollars in grants have been wasted by avoiding the black-middle class.
Also, the Atlanta Compromise approach won’t challenge conservatives/evangelicals to diversify their decision-makers and leaders. Why this matters: the black middle-class is the most effective means to help the black underclass if mobilized to so (for lots of cultural reasons).
I could say much more on this but I’m seeing just how sociologically inept many conservative/evangelical leaders are at understanding the black community. There are 1,000s of black middle-class GenZs who are waiting but I can’t get evangelicals/conservatives to recruit them.
Because they know nothing about DuBois v. Washington, Christian colleges & evangelical seminaries, eg., don’t recruit black middle-students & conservatives/libertarians have failed to create sustainable leadership pipelines (after Sowell, McWhorter, etc. there is no one).
The only person in America I know who understands the importance of the black middle-class is William Keyes & this program theinstitute.net.
After 20+ years of spitting in the wind about the black middle-class’s role in black flourishing, I think it’s time some of us found partners who get it & build with this amazing GenZ middle-class cohort who are being ignored (because they don’t produce white messiah stories).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Evangelicals don't have an elite problem. They have a formation problem. They raise bubble-wrapped cubicle boys and then complain about them later becoming passive men. Raised for passivity, destined for people-pleasing.
Aaron Renn (@aaron_renn) is right that evangelicals are missing from the commanding heights of American culture. No Big Tech, major finance, elite universities. But diagnosis misses this: The problem isn't weak institutions. It's what evangelical culture reliably produces.
Spend time in conservative Christian communities and a pattern emerges. Boys are raised to be responsible, polite, and safe. Failure is moralized. Ambition is redirected. Stability is celebrated. That's not formation for leadership. That's not formation for entreprenuers.
🧵New research just dropped and it challenges almost everything the culture wants you to believe about boys who grow up with violent fathers.
The headline finding is the one nobody wants to say out loud: Most boys who watch their fathers be violent do NOT become violent themselves. The intergenerational transmission story is far more complicated than the experts admit.
Boys across four countries were interviewed. They were not passive victims absorbing dad's behavior. They were moral agents making real decisions under terrible pressure.
We tell teenage boys: "Volunteer. Join that club. Lead that project. It'll look great on your college application." This is one of the most damaging pieces of advice we can give them. It's creating a generation of young men who are accomplished and adrift. Here's why: 🧵
This advice instrumentalizes virtue. It turns service, leadership, and hard work into mere tools for personal gain (careerism). The goal is no longer the good work itself, but the line it adds to a resume. This creates a deep and hollow "purpose-void."
True masculine virtue isn't found in curating a perfect resume. It's found in becoming a man who confronts chaos and solves problems. The meaning comes from the work itself—the intrinsic good of bringing order and overcoming challenges, not the narcissistic validation it brings.
Karen Horney has been my biggest influence in psychology.
She explained why “nice guys” burn out, why some become tyrants, and why others vanish into isolation. All of it comes from the same root. A quick guide 🧵
Horney (1885–1952) was a German psychoanalyst who broke from Freud. Forget Oedipus complexes—she said the real driver of human misery is deeper: Basic Anxiety.
Once you get this, people’s behavior starts making scary sense.
Basic Anxiety = feeling small, alone, and unsafe in a hostile world. Usually formed in childhood when love feels conditional. You can have a PhD, six figures, a family… and still live with it every day.
I’m old. At my church growing up, youth ministry was sex-segregated and led by the fathers (mostly in suits). Only the youth choir and Sunday School were co-ed. I didn’t see the wisdom in that—until I wrote my book on fatherhood. Here’s why, backed by research:
Black boys in America don’t just need mentors.
They thrive socially, economically, spiritually, etc. with deeply invested older Black men—especially fathers—who build trust with their family, speak into their identity, and walk with them as extended family.
A recent study found that Black youth don’t just benefit from one-on-one mentorship.
They thrive when mentors:
• bond with the boy’s family
• operate like extended family
• stay for the long haul
• and model what manhood looks like
We raised GenZ/GenAlpha boys to be sweet, self-effacing "nice guys" that all the moms like. Now they’re terrified of rejection, addicted to video games, paralyzed by fear--a reaction again the narcissism of millennials. Let me explain how we created a generation of doormats.
To fix “toxic masculinity,” we overcorrected.
We taught boys:
– never to take up space
– never to be assertive
– never to want anything strongly
– always to be soft, sensitive, agreeable
Now we have 20-year-olds who won't ask girls out or grow up. Don't blame video games.
What we called “humility” was actually training in self-erasure. What we called “niceness” was often neurotic people-pleasing. We taught boys that being liked by everyone is the highest good. Especially by women and teachers.