1) 40% of Republicans are open to a primary candidate besides Trump.
2) This fall's chief DC topic will be impeachment; Trump will likely be impeached. Whether there'll be a Senate trial is unclear.
3) By December, the GOP field could be:
Kasich
Sanford
Trump
Walsh
Weld
NOTE/ I'm not saying Trump won't be the GOP nominee. I'm saying an impeached Trump in the midst of a Senate trial that airs his crimes is a *damaged* Trump. There may well be a number of Republicans who make the case that the GOP can't afford the risk of a post-impeachment Trump.
NOTE2/ Mitch McConnell refusing to hold a Senate trial after Trump is impeached by the House is, to be clear, *illegal*. Moreover, the moment impeachment occurs Chief Justice John Roberts is the judge in the case; the House might well be able to successfully petition for a trial.
NOTE3/ Right now 40% of Republicans are open to a new primary candidate. Imagine the optics if impeachment and a Senate trial push that over 50% due to anxiety over whether Trump can win. The moment a *majority* of Republicans are open to a new candidate, many things will change.
NOTE4/ A vulnerable, post-impeachment Trump could widen the GOP field even more than we expect, perhaps even forcing televised debates; at any such event, GOP voters would *finally* see how easy it'll be to demolish Trump over his disloyalty to the country and gross incompetence.
NOTE5/ I've no doubt that Trump would refuse to debate, as he's fundamentally a grotesque coward; *and* I've no doubt Ronna Romney McDaniel and the RNC would refuse to in *any* way make room for primary challengers, as the RNC is enabling a criminal and has been for 3+ years now.
NOTE6/ But there's a question about what CNN/MSNBC would do if they saw the following field of high-profile Republicans attempting to challenge Trump and wanting a televised debate (even one Trump wouldn't attend):
NOTE7/ All this is hypothetical. The names in the prior tweet have all publicly proven themselves to be cowards in the face of Trump's autocratic nightmare. The question is whether impeachment, a trial and cable's willingness to televise debates without Trump could change things.
NOTE8/ But here's another way to look at it: the more candidates who join the GOP primary, the more likely it is that new candidates join because it begins to seem like a real primary, with a chance that donors open their purses and that cable news gives coverage to challengers.
NOTE9/ Now add another wrinkle: increasing signs of a coming recession. I think we underestimate how vulnerable Trump may come to seem to many viable Republican presidential candidates in the 120 days to come. But it's media that determines whether this story ever really emerges.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This essay is about more than it seems. It’s about American media, about the Biden presidency, about polling, about the current pretenders to the top of the Democratic ticket, and yes—in significant part—a vision of a Michelle Obama presidency I never thought I would write about.
Sorry... everyone here knows that polling has Michelle Obama up on Donald Trump by ELEVEN POINTS, right? It’s in the essay, of course, but I suppose I should make sure that folks understand that that is the reason this essay and essays like it needed/need to be written right now.
Only one group has the power to decide whether President Biden will end his campaign.
Corporate media.
Voters do not get a say, nor, contrary to popular opinion, does the Biden Family.
American media wants him gone, and it will make it so.
I understand some of you doubt this. You probably haven't been watching CNN.
If you watch CNN, you'll understand that it and the rest of corporate media plans to cover this story until the Democratic Party is so terrified it forces Biden out.
All this is happening in real time.
I have been a journalist since 1994, and I don't believe I've seen corporate media collectively want something as badly as it wants Biden gone. And it knows it has the power to do it, so it's not going to stop until it's done.
I don't think anyone could withstand this onslaught.
BREAKING NEWS: There's a real chance the SCOTUS ruling from yesterday also invalidated the 34 convictions Trump received in NYC, as if there was *any* introduction of evidence of official presidential acts at trial the trial and its result could be voided. nytimes.com/2024/07/02/nyr…
Yesterday I wrote that the Supreme Court ruling was far more evil than people realized.
Today I find myself writing that the ruling from yesterday is far more evil than *I* realized.
It appears we have a king now, and somehow we have this without the man even being a president.
When you treat the most vile man in American political history better than you treat anyone else on Earth, all you are doing is convincing weak-willed people to believe that that vile man must in actual fact be better than anyone else on Earth.
I'd feel better about this "coincidence" if Trump's jet hadn't been where he secreted stolen classified docs he publicly said he has every right to sell or gift as he sees fit, and if the Kremlin weren't interfering in this election on his behalf and wanting payment for doing so.
Some of you may forget—thinking Trump stored his most valuable stolen classified docs at Mar-a-Lago—but in fact that's not true. He sifted out the most valuable stolen docs and put them on his jet as he was leaving for New Jersey. We have no idea what happened to them after that.
The question is not whether the decision today allows President Biden to use SEALs to eliminate Donald Trump; it does, but he definitely should not. The question is if he can use DHS to preclude Trump from appearing on any ballots, forcing the GOP to select a different candidate.
Certainly he can find that Trump has colluded with foreign powers. And he can find that Trump incited an insurrection. Certainly it is at the outer limits of his official powers to preclude the federal government from sponsoring an election in which Trump appears on ballots.
He is not going to do any of that because he knows this Court is lawless; he knows that to take advantage of this ruling today would be anti-democratic; he knows his party would not go along; he knows it would cost him the election; he knows this SCOTUS would eventually jail him.
Supreme Court decisions cut both ways; they become the law of the land for *all*.
President Biden is *entitled* now—by *law*—to determine what official acts that might previously have been deemed illegal he can take, with presidential immunity, to protect us from insurrection.
I have no idea what those acts would be. I simply know that we are in the midst of an active insurrection that is being led by Donald Trump, and that the Supreme Court has just said that all presidents, including Democrats, have far more power than was ever previously thought.
Again, I do not know where this takes us. But I know that Republicans are discussing this decision as though it will only ever apply to Donald Trump if he attempts to establish a dictatorship in the United States after a hypothetical November election victory.