Michael Andersen Profile picture
Aug 22, 2019 10 tweets 5 min read Read on X
For the NYT's #1619project, @KevinMKruse explored how sprawl is in some ways a deliberate tool for segregating us by race.

But he didn't quite say *why* sprawl deepens segregation.

One of the main reasons: low-density life is expensive by design.

sightline.org/2019/08/21/did…
@KevinMKruse That map - showing race in PDX as of 2010 - is revealing in lots of ways. (National map available here: demographics.virginia.edu/DotMap/index.h…)

Here's the most diverse part of the metro area: East Portland. 1 dot=1 person.

See those hard lines? That's what zoning looks like from space.
@KevinMKruse Now let's take off our "race blind" goggles and look at the hard lines again. HMM.
@KevinMKruse I don't mean to pick on East Portland, which is (thanks also to its still-relatively-low prices) more racially diverse than my own neighborhood.

Here's my neighborhood. Guess where the highest-density building is!
@KevinMKruse Density alone doesn't guarantee diversity (or affordability). Here's central Portland: plenty of tall buildings filled overwhelmingly with white & Asian-American folks, most of them pretty well-off I'm sure.

Also older, lower-cost buildings with more Portlanders of color.
@KevinMKruse But if you want serious segregation, whoo, look at most of our southwest and northern suburban areas.
It's important to think separately about two factors, both related to density: general affordability, and neighborhood diversity.

General affordability is a region-wide condition: it requires building enough homes. Sprawl can do that (though there are costs). Infill can, too.
Neighborhood integration, though, happens by the block & the street. And as long as our country's racial wealth gap persists, density will be an essential ingredient for it. (Though not the whole recipe.)

That's because smaller, attached homes & walkable transit save money.
My own belief is that closing our racial wealth gaps will require racial integration.

In part because opportunities aren't evenly distributed by geography.

In part because we won't find public support for the policies we need until more of us see all of us as Us.
None of this is new to people who think a lot about fair housing or racial justice (including Kruse!). Obviously there's a lot more to say. But it's taken me a while to learn this much. That's what I'm trying to share here.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Andersen

Michael Andersen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @andersem

Jul 8
Big surprise from Oregon's 4plex bill, 5 years in: EVERY SINGLE CITY that had to legalize 4plexes ended up going beyond the state's baseline.

The state required local debates over fine print. After it, even the cities that fought the law ended up more pro-housing than required! a modern blue and white 2-story building with three doors facing the street
Why did this work so well? Two things in the law, I think:

1) Clear definition of "good enough." No wasted effort debating exact requirements.

2) Clear consequences. If you weren't compliant by 7/1/22, a state model code took effect automatically. Status quo was off the table.
And I should definitely add (3) a good faith effort by most if not all cities, even as some grumbled, to write good policy w/ local nuance.

When states set clear standards, they can enable the best angels of local government to do good, durable policy work.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 30
Great moments in political science, in which a research fluke leads to a pretty important finding about housing politics

short thread
1. @CSElmendorf, @ClaytonNall & @stan_okl polled Americans about their housing politics & learned that in general we

a) want lower prices
b) have no firm conviction that more homes will do this (even though we do think this is how car prices work, etc) theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
@CSElmendorf @ClaytonNall @stan_okl But Dr. E noticed that a follow-up poll had accidentally hit a bunch of the *same individuals* a second time … and that their stated housing price opinions were often totally different!

“Barely better than chance,” they write

Image
Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
Oct 31, 2023
Why re-legalize #FourFloorsAndCornerStores? One reason is that there's not a ton of difference in energy use per person between a neighborhood that looks like this... overhead image of a tree-lined street with older low-rise apartment buildings and single-detached homes mixed together
...and one that looks like this... overhead image of a neighborhood with many 20+-story skyscrapers
...but both of them are dramatically more energy-efficient than a neighborhood that looks like this. overhead image of a neighborhood with almost all single-detached homes
Read 5 tweets
Aug 30, 2023
If you'd like a fresh example of how zoning (a simple & fine idea) has become a micromanaging busybody that's accidentally tearing gashes in our civilization, here's one

(thread)
1. Portland high school (with a disproportionately Black student body) is up for a remodel, cool cool opb.org/article/2022/1…
2. District concludes it can't safely do the remodel without moving students offsite. Bummer, really wish folks had known about that sooner, but OK.
Read 14 tweets
Mar 29, 2023
Today, @GovTinaKotek signed this year's HB 2001, a fast-track omnibus package to address Oregon's long-term shortage of homes, especially lower-cost homes.

It's the biggest rewrite of state housing law since 1973, written to last til 2073.

But uh, what exactly does it do?

🧵
@GovTinaKotek First, a grain of salt: I have skin in this game.

Last spring, soon-to-be House Majority Leader @juliefahey told me this bill would be 2023's biggest chance to help fix our housing shortage & asked me to start building support.
In August my then-colleague @stephrouth & I visited the Oregon coast to talk to people from both parties & from many jobs to better understand the shortage, especially in smaller cities
Read 21 tweets
Jul 21, 2022
Good morning! It's a big day in Oregon as our state land use board prepares to vote on the largest cut to parking mandates in modern US history.

In state's 8 largest metros, mandatory auto parking would no longer be a meaningful barrier to homes & jobs.

sightline.org/2022/05/21/ore…
Here's a visual summary of the proposed parking reforms. Affected jurisdictions choose one of three options.

sightline-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/upl… branching tree of options
Why is Oregon doing this? @Citizen_Cate and I are so glad you asked!

For months, we've counted the ways parking mandates - little-known rules quietly imposed in the 1950s & 60s - hide huge costs inside everything we pay for, from rent to grapes.

sightline.org/costs-of-parki… photo of a duplex in a tree-lined neighborhood while a perso
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(