Here's the most diverse part of the metro area: East Portland. 1 dot=1 person.
See those hard lines? That's what zoning looks like from space.
@KevinMKruse Now let's take off our "race blind" goggles and look at the hard lines again. HMM.
@KevinMKruse I don't mean to pick on East Portland, which is (thanks also to its still-relatively-low prices) more racially diverse than my own neighborhood.
Here's my neighborhood. Guess where the highest-density building is!
@KevinMKruse Density alone doesn't guarantee diversity (or affordability). Here's central Portland: plenty of tall buildings filled overwhelmingly with white & Asian-American folks, most of them pretty well-off I'm sure.
Also older, lower-cost buildings with more Portlanders of color.
@KevinMKruse But if you want serious segregation, whoo, look at most of our southwest and northern suburban areas.
It's important to think separately about two factors, both related to density: general affordability, and neighborhood diversity.
General affordability is a region-wide condition: it requires building enough homes. Sprawl can do that (though there are costs). Infill can, too.
Neighborhood integration, though, happens by the block & the street. And as long as our country's racial wealth gap persists, density will be an essential ingredient for it. (Though not the whole recipe.)
That's because smaller, attached homes & walkable transit save money.
My own belief is that closing our racial wealth gaps will require racial integration.
In part because opportunities aren't evenly distributed by geography.
In part because we won't find public support for the policies we need until more of us see all of us as Us.
None of this is new to people who think a lot about fair housing or racial justice (including Kruse!). Obviously there's a lot more to say. But it's taken me a while to learn this much. That's what I'm trying to share here.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Great moments in political science, in which a research fluke leads to a pretty important finding about housing politics
short thread
1. @CSElmendorf, @ClaytonNall & @stan_okl polled Americans about their housing politics & learned that in general we
a) want lower prices
b) have no firm conviction that more homes will do this (even though we do think this is how car prices work, etc) theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
@CSElmendorf @ClaytonNall @stan_okl But Dr. E noticed that a follow-up poll had accidentally hit a bunch of the *same individuals* a second time … and that their stated housing price opinions were often totally different!
Why re-legalize #FourFloorsAndCornerStores? One reason is that there's not a ton of difference in energy use per person between a neighborhood that looks like this...
...and one that looks like this...
...but both of them are dramatically more energy-efficient than a neighborhood that looks like this.
If you'd like a fresh example of how zoning (a simple & fine idea) has become a micromanaging busybody that's accidentally tearing gashes in our civilization, here's one
(thread)
1. Portland high school (with a disproportionately Black student body) is up for a remodel, cool cool opb.org/article/2022/1…
2. District concludes it can't safely do the remodel without moving students offsite. Bummer, really wish folks had known about that sooner, but OK.
Today, @GovTinaKotek signed this year's HB 2001, a fast-track omnibus package to address Oregon's long-term shortage of homes, especially lower-cost homes.
It's the biggest rewrite of state housing law since 1973, written to last til 2073.
But uh, what exactly does it do?
🧵
@GovTinaKotek First, a grain of salt: I have skin in this game.
Last spring, soon-to-be House Majority Leader @juliefahey told me this bill would be 2023's biggest chance to help fix our housing shortage & asked me to start building support.
In August my then-colleague @stephrouth & I visited the Oregon coast to talk to people from both parties & from many jobs to better understand the shortage, especially in smaller cities
Why is Oregon doing this? @Citizen_Cate and I are so glad you asked!
For months, we've counted the ways parking mandates - little-known rules quietly imposed in the 1950s & 60s - hide huge costs inside everything we pay for, from rent to grapes.