Avenatti in Nike case is before SDNY Judge Gardephe, he's asked to dismiss the case citing selective prosecution, etc. His lawyer now whispering with AUSA Richenthal who prosecuted Patrick Ho (and Ng Lap Seng) for UN bribery - @SDNYLIVE thread
@sdnylive@MatthewLeeICP@darrenrovell@DanWetzel@PeteThamel AUSA complains that the government has not received any reciprocal discovery from Avenatti. Courtroom gallery less than half full. Avenatti's stock is going down, it seems - as least as gauged by media interest
@sdnylive@MatthewLeeICP@darrenrovell@DanWetzel@PeteThamel Avenatti wants to know what Judge Gardephe's position is on ex parte subpoenas. Says he doesn't want to reveal his trial strategy here. Predicts "significant motions in limine practice here," and litigation about Fifth Amendment privilege
@sdnylive@MatthewLeeICP@darrenrovell@DanWetzel@PeteThamel Avenatti's lawyer Scott Srebnick says to prove that Coach Franklin had a claim against Nike that Avenatti was legitimately pursuing, he's going to subpoena people. So he wants Avenatti's trial pushed back
@sdnylive@MatthewLeeICP@darrenrovell@DanWetzel@PeteThamel Avenatti's lawyer Srebnick is asking to put things back two months to January. Adds that since AUSA Richenthal has a trial - which one? - starting January 21, maybe Avenatti's trial should be pushed even further back.
@sdnylive@MatthewLeeICP@darrenrovell@DanWetzel@PeteThamel Judge Gardephe asks Avenatti's lawyer to "tee up the subpoena issues sooner rather than later." Says, "As to the assertion of the Fifth Amendment in front of the jury, that would be a first for me, you have an uphill battle" to convince me.
@sdnylive@MatthewLeeICP@darrenrovell@DanWetzel@PeteThamel US Attorney's office calls Avenatti's arguments "speculative." Judge Gardephe is asking for Team Avenatti's letter on this in a week, the government's in two weeks. Srebnick still punching, wants to file ex parte with Gardephe with trial strategy in them.
OK - in Epstein victims case against Bank of America, now settlement fairness hearing on $72.5 (or $85) million deal here @SDNYLIVE Inner City Press is covering the cases patreon.com/posts/epstein-… & OCC innercitypress.com/epsteinfiles5b… and will live tweet, thread below
All rise!
David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Brad Edwards - and Charlotte Taylor and more for Bank of America.
Judge Rakoff: My first question is, Who are you going to send the notice to and how are you going to determine that?
Boies: The people we have identified
Boies: Over time the list of survivors of the sex trafficking venture has grown. We would propose also some kind of publication notice.
Judge Rakoff: Members of the class will not know they have to file a claim or to opt out. Where would you publish notice?
OK - now at presentment in USA v. Zhan Petrosyants, good friend of ex-Mayor Eric Adams, last seen dodging a GEICO subpoena, now arrested for auto insurance fraud. His retained lawyer has been here in the SDNY Mag court waiting for the pre-trial services report 1/x
Waiting here for past hour with Petrosyants defense lawyer schmoozing, saying he'll need a New Jersey lawyer (presumably to secure the bond), commenting on a case wheeled out from grand jury - finally now pre-trial services report arrives
Woman who's been waiting here in the courtroom is now told to go to 26 Federal Plaza and "pick up his luggage" - hmm. She will not be bringing the luggage back to the courthouse, but is told (by lawyer) to "call an Uber for your husband." Waiting for judge
OK - now US v Maduro, hearing on whether Venezuela can pay his lawyer Barry Pollock. Inner City Press is covering the case and will live tweet, thread below matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-maduro…
11:42 am
All rise!
Barry Pollack: Your Honor, in Luis versus US the Supreme Court said that defendants have a right to counsel of choice, and to use untainted funds. Also, funds of a third party. Here, the Government has not contested these 2's property interest
Judge Hellerstein: The point in Luis was UNtainted funds. The similarity here is that... the sanctions are equivalent to the taint. Sanctions on Venezuela from paying out. That's a difference, isn't it?
Pollack: That is not outcome determinative under Luis
OK - now in Taibbi v. Higgins, oral argument on motion to dismiss. Defense lawyer Elizabeth McNamara: They must show the defendants knew or should have known what they reported was false. They can't. Inner City Press, banned from UN, will live tweet, thread below
McNamara: This comes down to a political fight.
Judge Daniels: The definition of "bought" is that someone has paid someone for something. And owned means not making independent judgments but based on the compensation they receive
McNamara: That's one definition
Judge Daniels: It's right on the cover. In what way was he bought?
McNamara: He highlighted 1st the Hunter Biden situation. Bought means being a sell-out, classic opinion. The flaw in their case is this is an implication of the cover. There's no implication count
All rise!
Judge Subramanian: We'll address later the proposed exclusion of some of Doctor Hill expert opinion, those that remain after the DOJ settlement. Jurors 9 and 12 are excused based on financial hardship - the Court was unable to solve it, they are excused
Judge Subramanian: I need five minutes, I've forgotten my notes on the objections.
States' Kessler: We will finish our evidence and finish our case next Wednesday [!]
[Before jury brought it]
Live Nation's Moskowitz: We do not want the jury to see Mr. Rapino's compensation. It's prejudicial.
States' Kessler: I am entitled to show how important this is to him, personally.
Moskowitz: The amount is not relevant to the bias.
Live Nation's Moskowitz: As long as we black out his compensation, we can live with that.
Judge Subramanian: Mischief managed. Mr. Hernandez?