Avenatti in Nike case is before SDNY Judge Gardephe, he's asked to dismiss the case citing selective prosecution, etc. His lawyer now whispering with AUSA Richenthal who prosecuted Patrick Ho (and Ng Lap Seng) for UN bribery - @SDNYLIVE thread
@sdnylive@MatthewLeeICP@darrenrovell@DanWetzel@PeteThamel AUSA complains that the government has not received any reciprocal discovery from Avenatti. Courtroom gallery less than half full. Avenatti's stock is going down, it seems - as least as gauged by media interest
@sdnylive@MatthewLeeICP@darrenrovell@DanWetzel@PeteThamel Avenatti wants to know what Judge Gardephe's position is on ex parte subpoenas. Says he doesn't want to reveal his trial strategy here. Predicts "significant motions in limine practice here," and litigation about Fifth Amendment privilege
@sdnylive@MatthewLeeICP@darrenrovell@DanWetzel@PeteThamel Avenatti's lawyer Scott Srebnick says to prove that Coach Franklin had a claim against Nike that Avenatti was legitimately pursuing, he's going to subpoena people. So he wants Avenatti's trial pushed back
@sdnylive@MatthewLeeICP@darrenrovell@DanWetzel@PeteThamel Avenatti's lawyer Srebnick is asking to put things back two months to January. Adds that since AUSA Richenthal has a trial - which one? - starting January 21, maybe Avenatti's trial should be pushed even further back.
@sdnylive@MatthewLeeICP@darrenrovell@DanWetzel@PeteThamel Judge Gardephe asks Avenatti's lawyer to "tee up the subpoena issues sooner rather than later." Says, "As to the assertion of the Fifth Amendment in front of the jury, that would be a first for me, you have an uphill battle" to convince me.
@sdnylive@MatthewLeeICP@darrenrovell@DanWetzel@PeteThamel US Attorney's office calls Avenatti's arguments "speculative." Judge Gardephe is asking for Team Avenatti's letter on this in a week, the government's in two weeks. Srebnick still punching, wants to file ex parte with Gardephe with trial strategy in them.
OK - in Harvey Weinstein trial, now Beverly Hills Montage Hotel manager on the witness stand. Inner City Press is covering the trial & will live tweet, thread below matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/fallen-stars…
Judge Curtis Farber: Cross examination
Weinstein's lawyer Teny Geragos: This was during Oscar season?
Witness: Yes.
Geragos: He often used the ballroom there?
Witness: Yes.
Geragos: He used an alias?
Witness: Many do at the Montage
Assistant DA: I have a stipulation, regarding Tolita Maia. We have both understand diligent efforts to find her and procure her testimony. We have not been able to. Signed by Jacob Kaplan, counsel for the defendant Harvey Weinstein.
Judge: No objection? Received.
OK - in Harvey Weinstein trial, now argument on prosecutor citing 2017 #MeToo articles about Weinstein. Judge Curtis: I'm going to tell the jury they can't consider it. Inner City Press is covering the trial & will live tweet, thread below matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/metoo-re-do-…
ADA: Everyone knew this was coming... Now the jurors will wonder why.
Judge: They don't have a right to know. Anyway, Ms. Mann can testify to this
ADA: She's not on until next week
Judge Farber: So you'll have read-back?
ADA: Yes.
Judge: Bring in the jury. I'm going to tell them to disregard.
Jury entering!
[Unlike with other judges in 100 Centre, and nearly all in SDNY, gallery does not have to stand as jurors come in]
OK - now at Harvey Weinstein trial, opening statements. At defense table this time, Marc Agnifilo and Jacob Kaplan. Inner City Press has covered the case from the beginning and will live tweet, thread below
Assistant DA: The defendant told Jessica to come into the bedroom. He pulled her in and started kissing her, backing her further into the room. She was 105 pounds. He was close to 300 pounds. He orally sexually assaulted her that night. She faked an orgasm...
ADA: She lied and said it was the best she ever had. Jessica didn't tell anyone. She had no family she could rely on. She blamed herself. Defendant began to pursue her romantically. Because of her limited experience and her religious upbringing she didn't see it
10:21 am
Now lawyers milling around in courtroom, Kessler and Pfeiffer and teams, talking about "demonstratives"
10:22 am
Now Marriott is in the courtroom gallery.
"Are we getting one copy? Or multiple copies?"
Live Nation has its "war room" down on the 11th floor - Inner City Press went there to cover a listed case before Judge Vargas and got some icy stares- and info : )
Oye Oye Oye!
Judge: We will immediately turn to US v Combs, all counsel are present. Ms. Shapiro will appear for the appellant and will reserve two minutes for rebuttal.
Shapiro: Yes, your Honor.
Judge: We have read the briefs. Ms. Shapiro?
Shapiro: This is about respecting jury verdicts-
Judge: You argue to not consider acquitted conduct. But this Court has held that it may be considered, right?
Shapiro: Yes.
Judge: So other than preserving your argument for an en banc panel or the Sup Ct...
All rise.
Judge Subramanian: You have the jury instructions
[not yet in the docket] Mr. Hernandez, bring in the jury... All rise!
[Jurors enter]
Judge: The evidence in this case has closed. You will hear closing arguments and my instructions on the law.
Judge Subramanian: First, you should not consider the win-loss data from SalesForce. As to Dr. Abrantes-Metz, she does not contend that Ticketmaster uses the term retained amount as she uses it. Now, the arguments. Mr. Kessler?