Fox Business interview. With Byrne. FBI Agent Peter Stzrok was coordinating the political surveillance of Hillary Clinton, Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and Donald Trump.
Resigned as CEO (Overstock) because he has been warned DC and Deep State is going to grind him down. He's a target now.
Warren Buffett told Byrne to get out of business world because his story of involvement with FBI will trigger deep state to target and destroy him publicly...
Byrne was offered a $1 Billion bribe to keep his mouth shut.
Byrne came forward to the DOJ (Bill Barr) in April. After he was assured that AG Bill Barr would be the guy to deal with it.
Byrne has been told the entire apparatus of DC (Deep State) will not be uni-focused on him to destroy his reputation.
This is huge stuff.
Political espionage.
*now
will *now* be uni-focused on him to destroy his reputation.
1) On March 6th 2009 then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton famously used a prop, "a reset button", to announce a new approach toward relationships between the United States and Russia. Clinton presented the button to her counterpart, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
2) In an attempt to break the ice with Lavrov, Clinton handed him a makeshift "reset" button wrapped in a ribbon at the start of their meeting. Laughing, she told the foreign minister that "we want to reset our relationship" and "we will do it together."
Lavrov promised to keep the button on his desk, but pointed out that the Russian word written on it, "peregruzka," meant "overload" -- not "reset."
3) At the time many people warned the Obama Administration was taking a very naïve position if they collectively thought the Russians would in any way align with U.S. interests.
The reasoning for the caution was simple.
For two decades the general Russian political class had felt "the West" in a general sense, and the U.S. in particular, had been dancing in the end zone about the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Regardless of whether or not the Obama administration wanted to admit there was a resentment in place, it factually existed.
Then something funny happened... The U.S Embassy "cable leak" scandal.
3. July 2017 McCabe denies again; to Inspector General Horowitz.
July 2017 Lisa Page admits to Horowitz she was told to construct the Wall Street Journal story (Devlin Barrett, journalist). This conflicts with McCabe's repeated denials.
If the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment and Joint Analysis Report were fabricated USIC intel in order to frame Donald Trump, then the JAR/ICA that led to the expulsion of 35 Russian assets was also a fabrication.
2) Using the Durham report, even the Wall Street journal said, […] “All of this suggests that the Mueller probe was as much a cover-up as an attempt to find evidence of collusion.”...
3) Yes. If the ICA/JAR were manipulated evidence (they were), and John Durham confirmed the Robert Mueller Trump-Russia collusion investigation was based on fraud (it was), then what does that say about the status of things?
2) Notice: “hundreds of thousands of emails turned over by Weiner’s attorney to SDNY”.
Pay super close attention. This is not an outcome of a New York Police Dept. raid on Anthony Weiner. This is Weiner’s attorney going to the U.S. attorney and voluntarily turning over emails. The emails were not turned over to the FBI in New York, the actual emails were turned over to the U.S. Attorney in the Southern District.
Key point here: Weiner’s attorneys turned over “emails”.
3) We already pieced this together 7 years ago.
Grassley needs to overlay the Strzok/Page text messages to the OIG report and the newly released "Clinton Annex."
SSCI Chairman Cotton is assembling his weapons right now, he has no choice - Cotton accepted the role. Tom Cotton is the "hand" of the Intelligence Community.
2) It's going to be bloody, brutal, vicious and one of the most consequential counter attacks in modern political history that few Americans will appreciate.
It's way over there.... on the beach.... far from view... far away from the crowd.... and it's going to be ugly.
3) She's doing this. But few, very few can actually see and understand what Tulsi is doing. I wrote the roadmap possibilities a year ago.
Compare what you see now, to this 👇. You will understand.
1) You guys know the background. You know the context. You know the history. You know all the nuances and Machiavellian manipulations that have brought us to this very specific moment.
2) Now, you are President Donald Trump and you are in a conversation with Vladimir Putin; a geopolitical ‘adversary’ whose current status was created by the same intelligence system operators that created your defined ‘enemy’ status within your own country. You and Putin were both targeted by the same intelligence system, the CIA.
3) Vladimir Putin does not view Americans as his enemy. Vladimir Putin views the CIA as his enemy.
President Putin is essentially ambivalent to your targeted position, but defines his adversary as your Central Intelligence Agency.
You want to cut the Gordian knot, change the geopolitical world, create a strategic alignment; but to do that you need Putin to accept you do not view him as the enemy. You also need to prove you have control over the apparatus he views as a threat.
How do you prove you have control over the agency?