Here's my story on how the media fell short on covering Epstein, with case studies on Vanity Fair, ABC & the NYT. It's a story of society ties, fears of legal threats, and working class victims.
In this story, Maria and Annie Farmer confirmed to me for the first time that they spoke of their experiences on the record to Vanity Fair. Their account was cut from the story.
You also hear the voice of Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who was interviewed 4+ years ago by ABC NEWS. The network tells NPR it will broadcast the fruits of its investigation in coming months.
Miami Herald's @juliekbrown deserves admiration for breaking the larger story wide open.
And Daily Beast's @kbriquelet has reported on this for years, along with colleagues at the high minded tabloid.
Yet much of press covered Epstein episodically and salaciously.
As both reporters told me, the Epstein scandal is fundamentally about power - its deployment and misuses as in #metoo, which changed how newsrooms handled accusers. Though not always.
Jeffrey Epstein served up tips for then NYT reporter Landon Thomas and charmed him into feeling they had something of a friendship. Epstein donated $30K at Thomas's request. His dinner party drew Stephanopoulos Couric & Rose. Epstein had confidence he could keep the press at bay.
Maria and Annie Farmer on being dropped from VF piece in 2003: "It was terribly painful. We hoped the story would put people on notice and they would be stopped from abusing other young girls and young women. That didn't happen. In the end, the story that ran erased our voices."
Virginia Roberts Giuffre on ABC sitting on her interview for four years: "I was defeated, once again, by the very people I spoke out against and once again, my voice was silenced. I could not believe that a formidable network like ABC had backed down and given in."
The magazine and the network cite journalistic standards and, in VF's case, legal concerns, for their decisions. All newsrooms must take such concerns seriously. And numerous editors note changes in the landscape wrought by #metoo on how credibility of allegations is assessed.
Taken together, these episodes may help explain how stories did not get more circulation and credence.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NEWS: There has been a massive offer from Murdoch's camp to resolve the hacking suits from Prince Harry and former MP Tom Watson, according to a person with knowledge.
Few want this more than Wash Post CEO Will Lewis, who is placed at center of allegations of a coverup / MORE
The complaints allege a conspiracy by top Murdoch British executives, including Lewis to conceal criminality at his UK tabloids 14 years ago.
Harry/Watson previously resisted offers, saying Murdoch empire & executives would escape full accountability for what happened at the Sun
Murdoch spokesperson at News UK declined immediate comment as did a lawyer for Harry/Watson
Much activity in lawyers' meeting rooms in the Rolls Building High Court.
NEWS: More than 400 Washington Post journalists - including some of its most distinguished reporters & editors - have sent plea to owner Jeff Bezos to intervene at the paper.
While not citing CEO Will Lewis by name, it casts a harsh light on his leadership./more
The petition reads, in part:
“We are deeply alarmed by recent leadership decisions that have led readers to question the integrity of this institution, broken with a tradition of transparency, and prompted some of our most distinguished colleagues to leave.”
The backlash against Lewis has encompassed Bezos to some degree as well as he publicly warms up to Trump.
The petition however states that the question of the presidential endorsement - which led to 300k+ cancellations in a matter of days - is "the owner's prerogative." MORE
NEWS: More than 200,000 subscribers have canceled their digital subscriptions to the Washington Post after the revelation that owner Jeff Bezos blocked an endorsement of VP Harris.
That's about 8 percent of WaPo's subscriber base - a staggering sum
MORE npr.org/2024/10/28/nx-…
That's as of midday, according to two people with direct knowledge. The figure continues to rise.
A corporate spokesperson declined to comment, citing The Washington Post Co.'s status as a privately held company. / MORE
“It’s a colossal number,” former WaPo Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli told NPR. “People don’t know why the decision was made. We basically know the decision was made but we don’t know what led to it.”
WaPost's @DavidHoffman has stepped down from the paper's editorial board warning of appeasing tyranny.
From his resignation:
"For decades, the Washington Post's editorials have been a beacon of light, signaling hope to dissidents, political prisoners and the voiceless. MORE
"When victims of repression were harassed, exiled, imprisoned and murdered, we made sure the whole world knew the truth... I believe we face a very real threat of autocracy in the candidacy of Donald Trump. I find it untenable and unconscionable that we have lost our voice." MORE
On Thursday, Hoffman received a Pulitzer for "a compelling and well-researched series on new technologies and the tactics authoritarian regimes use to repress dissent in the digital age, and how they can be fought."
David Shipley announced Bezos' decision the next day. MORE
NEWS: The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement in this year's presidential race, the editor of the editorial pages has told colleagues at a tense meeting this morning
This information according to a person with direct knowledge.
It is not clear whether Post owner Jeff Bezos or Publisher/CEO Will Lewis made the call
Shipley said the paper wanted to give readers an "independent" space in which to decide or whom to vote on their own /MORE
The decision was revealed in a tense meeting with people on the editorial staff
And it arrives at a time of heightened concern over whether news outles are pulling their punches in order to appease Trump in final days of a neck and neck presidential race agst VP Harris MORE