1. A father announced on Twitter some months ago that he had his 4-year-old child's birth certificate changed to the opposite sex. Today on Twitter, he explained his rationale to ppl who tried to argue with him.
2. One questioner asked why they couldn't wait until the child was older--at least puberty--and just allow the child to be GNC without doing something so permanent.
3. Dad says (more than once) that the preschooler liked wearing dresses, so they made the legal change to protect the child from a teacher's nasty questioning. Also "almost every developmental psychologist" says a kid's gender ID is set at age 3.
4. Also (more than once) Dad says they tried to "force" the child to do "boy things," which upset the child "she got really mental"). According to the many professionals they consulted, transitioning the child was the right thing to do.
5. The dad reiterates the birth certificate was changed so the child could "wear whatever" and not be bothered by teachers. It's not surprising that the string of professionals he lists endorsed this, because in the United States, this is the state of "affirmative" care.
6. It's easy to blame this dad, but parents wouldn't be assuming their gender-atypical tiny boys who want to wear dresses are really girls, without the stamp of approval from other adults in authority who should know better.
Unanimously agreed.
7. And NO developmental psychologists don't all agree that 3-yr-olds know their "gender identity." In fact, developmental psychology is a casualty of extreme trans activism and the complete abandonment of reason when it comes to transitioning children.
8. One casualty is medical organizations like the @AmerAcadPeds .
So: 4-yr-old who wants to wear dresses has a "long term" problem, solved by changing a piece of paper (a legal document called a birth certificate). And a gender-atypical little boy is now a gender-typical girl...
9. Dad posted this today. There's no reason to doubt him when he says a slew of professionals thought it was a good idea to change SEX on the birth certificate of a 4-yr-old--including a judge (who'd have to approve the change with a court order).
This is where we are in the US.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/Clinicians exposed in the #WPATHfiles admitted something obvious to any unbiased observer: Tweens/young teens can't make informed decisions about their future fertility. Blockers followed directly by cross-sex hormones typically results in sterility. 🧵
2/So how do pediatric genderists justify this rather significant side effect? A stunning recent example of a clinician rationalizing "they don't get it, but let's do it anyway" is a 2021 Zoom training with celebrity WPATH developmental psychologist Diane Ehrensaft.
3/Don't burden kids w/ "TMI" about icky & (to a 12 yr old) irrelevant talk about future baby-making. Ehrensaft: "How can a child 2 or 3 stages behind Erikson’s stage 7 anticipate what they will feel 2 or 3 stages later? It’s for us to start finding out. And we are.” #WPATHfiles
Planned Parenthood is sharing "facts" for parents on Facebook and other social media--including this one: Gender identity is formed "for everyone" in their toddler years.
They encourage parents to ASK their preschooler "are you a boy or a girl" to "create a safer space."
Here's a Facebook post from a couple days ago pushing these "facts." They manage to play the "suicide or transition" card, trans toddlers, and "there's no social contagion" -- all in one meme.
Must-watch clip from the Netherlands. Apart from the fact that brain studies have never been carried out on puberty-blocked youth, evidence from animal studies has revealed something huge: Blockers impair emotional and social development and behavior. In particular ...1/n 🧵
The ability to regulate emotions is a key aspect of normal development. What is emotional regulation? it includes understanding and modulating behavior rather than simply following one's impulses and acting on them--as most immature children do. 2/n
The very basis of "affirmative" care is that a child is "persistent, consistent, insistent" in their desire to be the other sex. How much of that demand is rooted in the very natural emotional immaturity of a child who is not yet able to process and regulate their emotions? 3/n
It's hard to believe Turban isn't being deliberately misleading. He KNOWS nearly all puberty-blocked kids go on to cross hormones, and that protocol does result in infertility. And immature gametes can't be frozen for later use; natural puberty is required for that.
Right here, Seattle Children's Hospital says it.
Turban knows. He just won't say it, because blocked kids almost never stop blockers and go through their "birth assigned puberty." So yes--they are sterilized! @JeremyShawMD
Right here, Diane Ehrensaft says it--at the very beginning of this clip. The standard affirmative protocol (which Jack Turban constantly promotes) sterilizes children--and Turban knows it. dailymotion.com/video/x7kqndq
Even people who support pediatric medical transition should question the trans-kid celebrity trend. "Hey I blocked my kid's puberty at 11, then put them on cross hormones at 12. This sterilized them & may have wrecked their future sexual function before they had any concept of what they were sacrificing... but look at me! Look at what a virtuous parent I am!" Oh, what if they regret all that publicity later on ... or even regret their transition? Maybe keeping private medical decisions about a minor...you know, private, might have been a better idea? "No worries, I'm on the right side of history. I'm not like those bigots! After all, my kid might be the next Jazz Jennings, getting SRS on national TV at 17!"
Imagine one of these children wanting to detransition, now or in the future. That's hard enough (ask any detransitioner) when you're not a public spectacle being unkindly gawked at by some, and depended upon by others (like the @ACLU , @HRC ) to promote a narrative. You are virtually guaranteeing these kids will maintain their "identity" because of all the public fallout they'd endure if they ever change their minds.
Closing quote from Diane Ehrensaft: " [kids] are far more advanced than I am, as somebody in my 70s, about how they live and understand gender...“So if we want to really understand gender, turn to the experts—and that would be the youth themselves.” archive.li/2023.08.24-123…
Scientific American @sciam a once-respected publication, didn't bother to ask why this 70+-yr-old **developmental psychologist** thinks a kid is equipped to sterilize themselves & knows more than she does. But then, neither did @wapo in 2018.
How does Ehrensaft keep getting away with this quasi-religious reverence for the wisdom and judgment of pre-pubescent kids? It would be one thing if the stakes weren't so high--as in, permanent sterilization and irreversible bodily changes. As a developmental psych, she KNOWS executive function is not fully in place until the mid-20s. Yet she keeps pushing her kids-know-best catechism and no reporter pushes back.