Bar and Bench Profile picture
Aug 23, 2019 40 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Court of ACMM Samar Vishal assembles to hear MJ Akbar's defamation case against journalist Priya Ramani.

Court to record Ramani's statement today.

#MJAkbar #PriyaRamani

#metooindia #MeToo

@mjakbar @priyaramani
My article, my tweets are a matter of record, Priya Ramani begins.

Statement being recorded in question-answer form.

It is correct that my tweets pertained to Mr. Akbar, Ramani adds.
I spoke the truth. My tweet was not malafide, in bad faith, deeply offensive, maligning and spun out of lies, Ramani.
I cannot say if it affected his (Akbar's) standing before family and friends. My allegations are true. His complaint is false and baseless, Priya Ramani.
I began the article with my experience with Akbar. The subsequent portion was not about MJ Akbar. It refered to the experiences of other females with their bosses. My tweets did not become the basis of articles in internationally known newspapers and websites, Ramani.
Akbar is deliberately singleling out my tweets and article. The articles were in fact based on the collective account of many women, including me, who spoke out about their experiences at the hands of Akbar, Ramani.
It is false that my tweets affected Akbar's reputation. I spoke the truth and there was no deliberate attempt to harm Akbar's reputation, Ramani.
Sunil Gujral, Joyeeta Basu, Veenu Sandal, Habib Rehman and Tapan Chaki are all close personal or professional confidants of Mr Akbar. They were all motivated witnesses in this false case against me, Ramani.
My allegations were not against Akbar's reputation as a writer or an author. My allegations related to being sexually harrassed and his conduct as an editor of a daily newspaper. My words were not false or offensive, Ramani.
Akbar's complaint is false and the allegations made by me against him are the truth, Priya Ramani.
I do not know the details of Veenu Sandal's career. I cannot say if and when she read my tweets or what effect they had on her, Ramani.
Sandal's statement that she was deeply distressed to think that someone whom she had placed on a pedestal could do what I had alleged is her personal opinion and has no bearing on my case, Ramani.
It is false to state that Akbar's reputation was damaged. I don't know what interactions Akbar had with Sandal but my allegations are factual and the truth, Ramani.
I do not know the details of Tapan Chaki's career or his opinion about MJ Akbar. All the editor editors I have worked with in my 25 years of being a journalist have writing skills, administrative skills, are exacting and demanding when it comes to copy, schedule.., Ramani
There is nothing special about MJ Akbar, Ramani.
I do know when MJ Akbar saw and read my tweets or what react they had on him, Ramani.
It is false that MJ Akbar has an impeccable reputation, Priya Ramani.
I do not know the details of Sunil Gujral's acquaintance with Akbar. It is false that Akbar is a perfect gentleman holding good reputation in society, Ramani.
I do not know which colleagues and friends Mr Gujral spoke to to form his opinion about MJ Akbar. But many women including myself who have worked with Akbar have had a a different experience, Ramani.
Mr Gujral does not know me and cannot comment on my experience with MJ Akbar. All editors are hard working men and women.. there is nothing special about Akbar, Ramani.
I do not know if and when Mr Gujral read my tweets, Ramani.
It is false that I damaged MJ Akbar's reputation.
I don't know the details of Joyeeta Basu's professional career and details of her acquaintance with MJ Akbar, Ramani.
Joyeeta Basu's high regard of Mr Akbar is her personal opinion. It is false to say that Akbar was a complete professional, that he was held in high esteem in office or in the eyes of the world, Ramani.
There was nothing scandalous about my tweet. Ms Basu is a false witness and her tweet, supporting the complaint, the day after I tweeted shows that Akbar's reputation was not destroyed or irreparably harmed in her eyes, Ramani.
It is false of her to say that MJ Akbar's reputation was permanently destroyed. My tweets were not malicious as she says. I spoke the truth, Ramani.
I do not know about Manzar Ali's printer details, Ramani.
Q. Why is this case against you?

Ramani: This is a false and malicious case filed to create a chilling effect against women who spoke out about their experience of sexual harrassment at the hands of Mr Akbar. It is an attempt to intimidate me.
..by deliberately targetting me, Akbar seeks to divert the attention away from the serious allegations of sexual misconduct against him and the public outrage that followed, Ramani.
I will lead evidence in my defence, Ramani.
My defence is the truth, spoken in the public interest and for the public good. It's only now that sexual harrassment at the workplace is regarded as a serious offence, Ramani.
I would like to share my story in brief. I was 23 when MJ Akbar, the editor of a soon to be launched Asian Age newspaper called me to his hotel for a job interview. When I got there, I had expected the interview to be in the lobby or the coffee shop, Ramani.
..But Akbar insisted that I come up to his room. I was young, it was my first job interview, I didn't know how to refuse. I didn't know that I could set the terms of my interview, Ramani.
When I reached his room, it was an intimate space, essentially his bedroom.. I was deeply uncomfortable, felt unsafe at Mr Akbar's repeated, inappropriate personal questions, his offer of an alcoholic beverage, his loud singing of songs, his invitation to sit close to him, Ramani
Later that night, I called my friend Niofer and told her what had happened. In Oct 2017, the #MeToo movement in America emboldened countless women and share their experiences of sexual harrassment at workplace. In this context, I wrote a piece for Vogue magazine, Ramani.
The piece was addressed to and titled 'To the Harvey Weinsteins of the World' where I spoke about many women's experiences with many male bosses, Ramani.
One year later, when #MeToo came to India and many women in media started speaking up, I felt, as a senior journalist, my responsibility to remove the clock the annonymity. I decided to name him, Ramani.
I spoke the truth in public interest and in the context of the #MeToo movement. I finally had the courage and the platform to name MJ Akbar publically, Ramani.
MJ Akbar has filed a false case against me. He has deliberately targetted me to divert attention away from serious complaints against him. Through his testimony, Akbar feigned ignorance about my story and my truth, Ramani.
It is unfortunate that women who had faced sexual harrassment at workplace must now defend themselves in criminal proceedings for speaking the truth, Priya Ramani concludes.

#MeToo

#PriyaRamani #MJAkbar
Matter adjourned till September 7.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Sep 6
Supreme Court Justice BV Nagarathna to shortly speak at the convocation ceremony of National Law University, Delhi.

#SupremeCourt #NLUD Image
Justice Nagarathna: dear graduates, today is not merely the conclusion of your academic journey but the beginning of your voyage into justice, law, and public service.
Justice Nagarathna: today you stand at the threshold of a profession that is intellectually demanding, emotionally testing but above all profoundly of consequence not only of your lives but society at large.
Read 44 tweets
Sep 5
Punjab and Haryana High Court refuses immediate hearing of PIL on #PunjabFloods

The officers are right now dealing with the ground situation, they will have to sit down and file affidavit for this. We don't want to do that: Chief Justice Sheel Nagu Image
They will be extricated from that flood relief and they will be sitting on a table, preparing an affidavit for your petition, which we don't want to do: Chief Justice Sheel Nagu
Government of India, State of Punjab ... we are doing our best. Yesterday, the Agriculture Minister was there... this is not the time to raise this issue: Additional Solicitor General Satya Pal Jain
Read 4 tweets
Sep 4
Supreme Court resumes hearing the suo moto case on struggles faced by cadets who were disabled during military training.

Bench: Justices BV Nagarathna and PK Mishra. Image
Order: Ld ASG appearing for the respondents has filed status report. The same is taken on record. She submitted that in response to the notices issued by this Court the Govt. Of India, Ministry of Defence, Dept. of ex-servicemen welfare has thought of medical benefits being extended in the form of ECHS to all invalidated out-cadets without any subscription fee. In as much as the one time subscription fee of 1.2 lakhs currently payable by ESM officers need not be paid by such out-boarded cadets due to attributability or aggravation by military training
Order: further details of the said scheme may be placed on record. As far as monetary benefits are concerned the status report has been filed and taken on record. We have perused the figures that are provided. the amounts that are provided ex gratia are of 2017. Having regard to the lapse of time since 2017 we find that endeavours could be made to enhance the said figures accordingly bearing in mind the current inflation and price rise.
Read 7 tweets
Sep 3
Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and Speaker of Lok Sabha Om Birla to shortly speak at the Dr. LM Singhvi memorial lecture organised by Jindal Global University.

The topic of the lecture is- “Human Dignity as the soul of the constitution: Judicial reflections in the 21st century”.Image
Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Advocate Avishkar Singhvi will also be addressing the event.
SCBA President Vikas Singh and DHCBA President N Hariharan handing out mementos to CJI Gavai and Om Birla respectively. Image
Image
Read 28 tweets
Sep 3
Supreme Court hears a plea challenging a Bombay High Court order that quashed a decision of the Yes Bank administrator to write off additional tier 1 bonds worth Rs 8,415 crore as part of a bailout. Image
In January 2025, a bench comprising former Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justices Sanjay Kumar and KV Viswanathan said it will not hear the four pleas filed against the high court's decision and referred it to another Bench.
Today, a bench of Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra will hear the matter.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 3
Delhi High Court issues notice to MP Mahua Moitra in Advocate Jai Anant Dehadrai’s appeal against a trial court order in the ongoing “custody” battle - over a pet rottweiler named Henry. Image
In the March order of the Saket Court, parties were directed to not publicise the case. Dehadrai claims that this order is against his freedom of speech.
The matter was listed before Justice Manoj Jain.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(