WOW.

Okay. So. I'm still waking up (my typical post-performance insomnia last night) so it's going to take a while to pull my thoughts together on this, but.

This marks a turning point.
First thing we have to acknowledge is that Hair Furor's Twitter has been considered to be an official source for government directives; quite possibly, it's the most official one because he otherwise hates to make things explicit or put them in writing.
Second thing is, this is not the first time he's tried issuing orders to private companies. Before he was even sworn in, he called the media in on the carpet and tried to give them marching orders for how it's going to be.
His understanding of the presidency is that it's something like being king but even more so it's being Boss of the Country. He assumed President Obama was directing the media, and that if the president couldn't control the other industries it was because he was weak.
So this isn't exactly *new*. But it's hard to get around the starkness of the wording "hereby ordered". Which isn't to say that Kellyanne Conway can't go on television and say "I think what he was speaking to is that it would be in their interest to blah de blah blah blah."
The idea of the federal government seizing control of industry... that's a load-bearing wall of so much conservative rhetoric pushing back against social programs, environmental regulations, etc. as "creeping socialism".
It's also a bright red line for how a lot of conservatives explain away fascism. In their mind, it's not fascism until the dictator intrudes into private enterprise. "The Nazis were national socialists!" plays into this.
So what do I expect to change as a result of Trump making this massive authoritarian powerplay in plain sight?

Nothing at first. Nothing right away. In the short term, damage control will be a mix of walking it back, and trying to figure out why It's Good That He Did That.
Republicans (including both politicians and business oligarchs) who are nervous about this but aren't ready to break with him -- and that's going to be almost all of them -- will wind up toeing the line "for now", thinking that if things go really wrong they can leave.

Again.
In the medium term, the fact that people are saying Trump shouldn't have said this and that he can't order businesses to do things... is going to make him double down, and put all those people toeing the line "for now" on the spot, turning it into a loyalty test.
So in the long term... yep, this is another step towards full and open totalitarian fascism. A lot of Republicans are going to shrug and say "I guess he's in charge of what businesses do now." and a lot of businesses are going to say, "Well, he still beats the alternative."
There's a principle in US politics and how we talk about them, that's sometimes called Only Nixon Can Go To China and sometimes called It's Okay If You're A Republican.

I prefer to call it Rules Are For Democrats.

Or hypocrisy.
Under a Democratic president, because the Right has decades of experience preaching against how Democrats are a bunch of communist authoritarians, we can just barely pass something like the Affordable Care Act (made up of Republican ideas), and that's *still* socialism somehow.
But under Republicans... I mean, they can outright give marching orders to private enterprise and somehow it's what freedom means, because Everybody Knows It's The Other Side That's Commies.
Yep.

I mean, we're hearing right now that the Koch brothers fought authoritarianism. How? By empowering the right-wing takeover of the government that is currently seizing total power over our lives and deaths forever.

They're all afraid of being sent to the cornfield.

Anyway.

A so-called president of these benighted states going on social media and saying that "our" companies are "hereby ordered" to do anything... that *should* be a career-ending move, not just because it's authoritarian but it demonstrates a complete lack of understanding.
But while I'm saying it demonstrates his complete lack of understanding about the nature and structure of government, the way businesses work, etc.... I'm also saying that in effect the political and business worlds will bend themselves into the shape he desires.
It turns out the fascist Will To Power has a lot in common with the Will To Stand In Line At The Subway Sandwich Counter And Say "But I Don't Understand Why You Won't Take This Blimpie's Coupon, It's For A Sandwich And You Sell Sandwiches, Don't You?" Until The Manager Gives In.
Donald Trump's refusal to understand limits is more strategically useful than a refusal to accept limits, because it makes it presents another level of obstacles before someone can even try to argue with him about it.
This is how democracy dies: to thunderous forehead-smacking.
He's mimicking language he's seen in things like judicial judgments. He wants to usurp the power of the courts, which as he sees it can just say whatever they want (and too frequently go against him).

A good place to start if you're not sure why he's saying something is to try to figure out where he heard it (e.g., Fox and Friends). "[X] is hereby ordered to" is legalistic language he's certainly butted up against enough in his lifetime.
He is the "business president" famous for playing a successful businessman on TV.

Talking about business.

I haven't checked but I imagine the stock market may be nosing downward in response to Donald's rage tweets this morning.
The thing is... his supporters always make a big deal out of the fact that he gives up his salary of $400k a year. And his detractors quite rightly point out that he makes more than that back in influence peddling, inflating his club dues, emoluments.

But that's small change.
The grift Trump is performing through his clubs and hotels is just how he keeps his hand in. It's penny ante stuff. Runaway greed, but not enough to prop up his lifestyle or keep his hollow empire afloat.
Where Trump sees big money in the presidency is in the power to wreck the economy.

A lot of people of means were ruined by the Great Depression, but for the ultrarich? It was a means to solidify their wealth and power.
L. Ron Hubbard, before he founded Scientology, would regularly tell anyone who would listen and many who wouldn't that there was no real money in science fiction so he was going to get rich making up a religion.
And Donald Trump told us all before he assumed the presidency that he would ruin the economy and get rich.
I've said before that Trump doesn't invest in the stock market in a conventional sense. When he talks about buying stock in something, it's almost always in terms of getting a significant stake, if not a controlling one. He doesn't want an interest in their success but ownership.
When "the stock market crashes", what that means is that stocks are selling for cheap which means that whole companies and their assets are available for firesale prices.
That's not even getting into the stuff like short sales that let speculators with deep pockets just absolutely make a killing as the market falls.
Trump's lifestyle of the rich and famous doesn't depend on him having any actual money (and even moreso now that he's in power) - give him a chance and he will light the house he lives in on fire and gamble that he will be the best at selling ash.
Stephen Miller and Steve Bannon also have favored crashing the economy as a part of burning down the old world so they can rebuild all our institutions to their own specifications.
So don't assume this is all *just* cluelessness. He doesn't really understand what the presidency is supposed to be or how businesses work, but he doesn't care. He'll make them work the way he wants to, unless and until someone stops him.
And that, for now, is all I have to say about that.

Tip your weird Twitter pundit.

paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alexandra Erin | patreon.com/AlexandraErin

Alexandra Erin | patreon.com/AlexandraErin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlexandraErin

Jan 25
"How can one person be a they? It doesn't make sense."

Same way one person can be a he or she.

"Those words are singular."

No. Those words, like all words, are shapes and sounds. Words don't make any sense. Words don't do anything.

We make words, and we make sense of them.
There's all kinds of other arguments that favor the validity of singular they, including the fact that even people who claim it's a contradiction use it reflexively when the *only* thing they know about the unknown antecedent is that it's one singular person.
There's the argument about established use, where "they" has been used as a singular pronoun for longer than "you" was standardized as the second person singular; "you" is still grammatically plural, as in "She is one person. He is one person. You ARE one person."
Read 5 tweets
Jun 21, 2023
Here's a reason I'm a pro-mockery of the OceanGate fiasco: that whole "regulations stifle innovation" thing that crops up in their PR to present the whole "untested and unlicensed" thing as a feature rather than a bug: people who want us eating heavy metals for breakfast say that
The idea that safety regulations and oversight are anti-business, anti-competition, anti-future, and anti-human survival (because the geniuses who would save us have their hands tied)... that's a huge and consequential part of right-wing/libertarian mythology.
And no, I'm not saying that libertarian and right-wing are the exact same thing. That's why I said both of them. Because they aren't exactly the same thing.

But there's a lot of areas where their goals and methods overlap perfectly, even if their professed beliefs do not.
Read 13 tweets
Jun 21, 2023
Don't disagree with Representative Raskin here about the principle, but we all need to be ready for the fact that the GOP attacks on Joe Biden via Hunter aren't likely to stop or even change no matter what he does or does not do.
And counting on the people - even those who aren't specifically part of the right-wing echo chamber - to notice the disconnect and the hypocrisy... well, I mean, a lot counts on the media not blandly reporting/repeating the attacks like they're normal and well-founded.
The idea that is prevalent in so much of the media that the proper thing to do is amplify both sides and if one of them is absurd or dangerous, "the American people will see and decide that for themselves".

But to the extent they trust the news, they trust the news.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 20, 2023
Writing this thread yesterday was a huge aid in further clarifying and refining What I'm Doing Here with this TTRPG project.

Today I'm finding that weighing against me a bit, as I remember how much writing the thread felt exciting and like I was doing something...
...and how much more it felt like I was getting something done and communicating ideas clearly in the thread vs. when I try to write even a "gallop draft" or Pratchettian 0th draft of actual mechanics.

So I'm going to give my brain a break by threading about the ideas more.
Two things I mentioned in that thread, about things a Paladin can mostly *just do*, the idea of a Paladin's vow having a supernatural ring of truth that is *just believed* here, and sensing the presence of deceit, are both part of two important aspects.

Read 36 tweets
Jun 20, 2023
The sentence "At some point, safety is just pure waste." is such a perfect distillation of something I've tried to articulate over the years about *gestures vaguely around at everything*.

Whatever happened to the sub now, it was cheaper at the time to assume it just wouldn't.
This logic goes into oil tankers and pipelines: sure a spill will be catastrophic and expensive, but what's the alternative... spend "extra" money forever to try to head off something that just might not happen?
And of course, the pandemic. All of the missed opportunities and half-measures... the long-term cost of not investing in safety is a problem for a future version of us who might not even exist. Cheaper to assume it won't.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 20, 2023
This is something Todd from Bojack would make as step one of filming Todd Chavez's James Cameron's Titanic.
This is something you would see on a show about doomsday preppers with tiny houses.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(