The thing that enmaddens me is that when I talk about how education is overprescribed, or that we've entered a dysgenic age, the point is not "lol go be randomly violent"
It's the exact opposite, to identify traps of modernity, avoid them, and improve your own life within this
I am attempting to identify what's gone wrong so that people can live according to what's better, what will make them + their children happy and successful despite all the pressures to make us worse
The point is never "Go be Breivik," instead it's the opposite: "Ride the tiger"
It's comical, "gaslighting" even, that these journalists want to pretend everything is on the upswing when wages have been flat for 40+ years, liberalism is dying, Big Cricket is trying to make you eat bugs, + your standard of living will be lower than your grandparents
Who is the one that's more evil? The one that points these problems out?
Or the one that insists more of the same will, somehow, eventually make your life better, if only we do even more of what got us here?
"If you find yourself in a hole, quit digging"
It's ridiculous I even feel compelled to respond to this. "Make yourself better" + "Here are the ways society is failing us" is not a call for terrorism
It's the exact opposite. It's a way to call people away from the abyss and back towards what is true and beautiful
The fact the Cathedral treats these efforts as violence is only because it perceives it as a threat to its power
And that power process would rather *encourage real terrorism* than grapple with its failures, because creating terrorists only increases its power to destroy dissent
I want you to succeed and become great in order to undermine everything telling you to be weak. Guarantee BAP wants the same.
This is the exact opposite of how our side is portrayed by the journalist.
That, in itself, tells you everything you need to know.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Do you remember how after the assassination attempt on Donald Trump the left created a conspiracy theory it must be fake based on the idea no person would stand up like this after he was just shot in the head
These are both examples of "prey morality." Life-forms who are biologically unable to understand the concept of humans who are willing to directly challenge other human predators. Who tell you to "freeze" when they get preyed on
My personal stories about illegals aren't even that bad. No murders, rapes, etc.
But if you work with immigrants for long enough, they will eventually start bringing in co-ethnic workers even *they* can't trust. And you won't know what these people are like until after the fact
Within democracies, the voters of the US, UK, and France are now all obliterating their "center-right" in favor of a far right, while the panicked lib-centrist "Adults In The Room" shovel their power to the far left
Lib-centrist democracy is dead. And mass migration killed it
Whatever else happens, 20th century liberal democracy has—depending on your perspective—either killed itself, or been forced to reveal what it was all along
The genie can't be put into the bottle. That form of government, and its norms, is now behind us for good
The question is always, Was it deliberate, or was it accidental
My dissection of the corpse is that it was a combination of biotrash leftists who seduced a genuinely well-meaning liberal class
These are all minor factors at most, and in many cases don't matter at all. The overwhelming causes of violent crime are 1) your genetic lineage and 2) the state's willingness to let crime exist.
1) horrifies the left, causing them to stampede to increase 2) as hard as they can
The leftist explanation for crime is it is always, exclusively caused by *external* factors
The liberal response to this is to policy-tweak those factors away
The leftist response is to punish you for *causing* the factors that "made" these people criminals to begin with
Since there is no possible policy under scientific liberalism that can undo the genetic factors of crime—its inequality will continue to exist across both class and race—the frustrated anger of this ideology results in a mounting desire to punish normal people for crime
Nevertheless, the outer-productive regions were still able to sort of maintain themselves as industrial zones and city-feeders until the Regime stripped their means of life, industrialization, from them
Now they have neither the ideology to replace themselves nor the economic means to support themselves to provide for the cities that robbed from them (and, to be fair, enriched us all) for centuries
The old system broke down. All that remains, for the system, is mass migration