1/ I am sure pundits are going to praise @WalshFreedom for running against Trump. His opposition to Trump is more on the level of personal characteristics than policy. One concept that pundits do not seem aware of is the "correlation of forces." It is a Soviet concept of how to
2/ measure the relative and net power of two opposing forces. American pundits just love to wallow & immerse themselves in personality politics. It's fun. But, look at the GOP's correlation of forces. It has built a $5 Billion information warfare infrastructure dedicated to the
3/ idea that only the free-est free market can deliver freedom & prosperity, and government can only deliver slavery & tyranny. On issue after issue, corporations & the rich are exalted. There is another information warfare infrastructure dedicated to generating, amplifying, and
4/ spreading Fear and Anger and Loathing, while delegitimizing the federal government, the Democratic Party, and Democratic voters. Then, there is the information warfare infrastructure on the web and IRL that fulfills its role of reacting to the Fear, Anger, & Loathing. Nothing
5/ the Proud Boys or other white nationalists hate has not already been designated a legitimate target for destruction by the Christian Right, with the exception of Jews which get "code word" anti-Semitism from the Christian Right in terms that look like prophecy. Personality
6/ punditry & journalism let's all these correlation of forces slide by. Blame Trump for everything. But, Joe Walsh's policies won't be very different from Trump's or Jeb Bush's. Sure, there may be nuances, but there won't be that many differences to make a difference. Or look at
7/ the Democrats and their correlation of forces. @PaulHRosenberg has an excellent piece on why Democrats use the term "hard left" to describe Warren, Sanders, & AOC. salon.com/2019/08/25/whe… // One reason, given the correlation of forces is its think tanks are administration's in
8/ waiting. All the centrist, moderate policies just waiting for a centrist, moderate candidate are in the DC think tanks & given promotion time on cable news. There's probably a very good reason that Warren has gone deep into academia to find real subject matter experts to craft
9/ her policies. Her candidacy is as much an intellectual insurgency as it is a grassroots insurgency. Sanders' campaign is more of a grassroots insurgency than an intellectual one. But, Biden? Klobuchar? Harris? Buttiegig? Where is the deep intellectualism of their policies? And
10/ so with Walsh & Weld, we get stories of how brave they are. But, what we will not get stories of is how deeply immoral & rotten is the core and foundation of the GOP. There is absolutely nothing redeemable in the GOP. That is the message a Joe Walsh ought to campaign on. It
11/ is time for the GOP to take a long, hard look at how it has turned its back on Lincoln & Eisenhower & Rockefeller. From the jump, William F. Buckley sided with the white supremacists. Campaign against that. wapo.st/2Pa5rPI?tid=ss…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Scaminaci III🇮🇱🇺🇦🇫🇮

James Scaminaci III🇮🇱🇺🇦🇫🇮 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @4GWDOTDOTDOT

Jun 21, 2023
4GWDOTDOTDOT: Fourth Generation Warfare Has Come To America 4gwdotdotdot.blogspot.com/2023/06/fourth… This is my third strategic warning regarding the Christian Right's 4GW. It is the most dire. Here are the four concluding scenarios.
Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 25, 2022
Check out this article from @nytimes. Because I'm a subscriber, you can read it through this gift link without a subscription. nytimes.com/2022/07/25/opi… Democratic Party voters did not see Harris as a presidential contender. I thought she would end up as Attorney General in a
2/ Democratic administration. Harris was incredibly weak on economic policy. Warren sliced & diced Harris in debates on economic issues. I still don't see her as a presidential candidate. Her speech delivery is boring. She looks wooden. And except for the law, has no policy
3/ expertise. She checks demographic boxes but has little to offer voters. The party base is looking for fighters & brawlers with vision--people like Warren & Sanders. We don't need civility or charm. We need party leaders who are willing to engage in brass knuckles fights with
Read 6 tweets
May 24, 2022
Larry Hogan offers himself as a potential island for what he calls “the exhausted majority of voters” of both parties, @MarkLeibovich reports. But is he just living in a shining city on a hill of wishful thinking? theatlantic.com/politics/archi… The problem for Hogan and Never Trump GOP
2/ twofold. One, Trump strongly influences the GOP base and the GOP base looks to Trump for political guidance. Two, why does anyone believe that a Reaganite GOP has any answers to 21st century questions on climate change, civil rights for minorities, and reproductive rights for
3/ women? Is this new-and-improved GOP going to give us more deregulation? More market solutions? The GOP is intellectually dead. In Reagan's day, plenty of bright folks at the Hoover Institution were turning out policies for Reagan. Now, the GOP depends on the dregs at the
Read 4 tweets
May 23, 2022
My Washington Post subscription allows me to share access to great journalism. Check out this gift article, at no cost to you.

Read here: wapo.st/3sT3jgF The only problem with Sargent's analysis of Stefanik's "doubling down on replacement theory" is that Stefanik did
2/ not. I have been collecting and analyzing hundreds of public opinion polls on immigration. What she is talking about, in a great simplified 140 characters, are what even Democratic strategists know is the Democratic Party's strategy: while not open borders, it is giving 11
3/ million undocumented aliens a path to citizenship, which eventually gives them the right to vote. Democratic strategists call that the changing composition of the electorate. That is entirely different from the Great Replacement theory which assumes that massive immigration
Read 11 tweets
May 15, 2022
Check out this article from @nytimes. Because I'm a subscriber, you can read it through this gift link without a subscription. nytimes.com/2022/05/14/opi… I will take door number 2. We keep supplying Ukraine weapons, ammo, & supplies to achieve victory. Putin can escalate but any
2/ escalation on his part is doomed. He does not have nuclear dominance. His army is being put through a meat grinder. If they tangled with NATO, they would be pureed. His air force is no match for NATO and forget his navy against the Sixth Fleet. Our goal should be to crush
3/ Putin's nuts in a vice in Ukraine. Drive his forces out of Ukraine. Allow Ukraine to crush the separatists in Moldova. And then NATO/EU put the screws to Belarus. NATO/EU also has to fix the Hungary problem. That can be solved by withholding cash from Orban. Anyone wanting or
Read 4 tweets
May 8, 2022
It’s time to reboot America, former U.S. representative Will Hurd says washingtonpost.com/magazine/2022/… With all due respect to Will Hurd, he's a rodeo clown. What I mean is this: he's a one-man band in the GOP. If by some miracle he became president, where would he find the 4,000+
2/ political appointees? They'd be in Heritage Foundation binders. Where would he find federal judges. They'd be in Federalist Society binders. The GOP is rotten from the attic to the basement. The grifters, charlatans, theocrats, authoritarians, fascists, QAnoners occupy all the
3/ all the floors. The inmates run the asylum. The "sane" GOPers--Romney, Murkowski, Smith--are phonies through and through. When it actually comes doing something, they run and hide. The GOP has now been transformed--as Paul Weyrich, William Lind, Howard Phillips--intended it to
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(