In my new book ‘The Struggle for Democracy in Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong’ I critique the ‘winner-takes-all’ (你死我活) conception of politics in the People’s Republic of China /1
On p.73 I cite Thomas Gold’s definition of Chinese political culture /2
I subsequently quote Joseph Fewsmith who “suggests that a ‘winner-take-all conception of politics has been the hallmark of CCP politics’”/3
Why am I revisiting these paragraphs in my new book? This morning I read Andrew Higgins New York Times report from Monday, 26 August on Jimmy Lai, the 71-year old Hong Kong tycoon, owner of the online Next magazine and staunch supporter of the pro-democracy movement /4
Higgins points out that Chinese state-media has vilified Lai “as a CIA agent, a ‘black hand’, and a member of an American-directed ‘gang of four’ supposedly responsible for orchestrating the Hong Kong protest movement”.
These accusations reveal the paranoia among CCP leaders /5
But the most remarkable paragraph in Higgins excellent New York Times report comes a bit later, which reveals the real-world implications of the CCP’s political culture of ‘you die, I live’ (你死我活) /6
Higgins writes: “China’s relentless campaign of vilification against Mr. Lai took a particular nasty turn this month when his name was purged from the genealogical records of his family across the border in southern China” /7
This act of ‘eliminating names’ — in this case Jimmy Lai’s — supports Thomas Gold’s definition of Chinese political culture /8
Higgins reports: “His relatives, according to a report in Ta Kung Pao, a Communist Party-controlled newspaper in Hong Kong that invariably refers to him as ‘fatty Lai’, deleted his name from a family tree going back 28 generations, declaring him a ‘traitor’ to his ancestors... /9
... and his country who is no longer part of the clan.”
Anyone vaguely familiar with Chinese culture and society will understand how crass this campaign of demonization of Chinese party-state critics like Jimmy Lai is /10
Anyone who still believes that the Chinese Communist Party is a guardian of ‘Chinese culture’ and anyone who argues that the cultural identity of China is somehow pre-political should reflect on what has just happened to Jimmy Lai, a very good and decent man /End
"Dialog mit dem Drachen" 🐉 lautet der Titel des neuen Buchs der Sinologin @RudyakMarina. In der Einleitung steht, dies wäre "kein Marketing-Trick", vielmehr sei die "Metapher des Drachen vor allem eine Übersetzungsaufgabe". Ende 2022 klang das noch ganz anders. Ein 🧵/1
Im Austausch mit @thorstenbenner zitierte @RudyakMarina am 1.11.2022 ihre BA Chinese politics Studenten. Rudyak lobte in ihrem tweet eine aktuelle Publikation von Nadège Rolland zu China für ihre inhaltliche Tiefe und den Verzicht auf Klischees wie den Drachen /2
Daher bin ich verwundert. Wenn klar ist, dass wir als China-Experten nicht überkommene Klischees benutzen sollen, warum wird es hier dennoch bedient? Lin Hierse hat 2021 in @APuZ_bpb solche überkommenen China-Bilder bereits überzeugend kritisiert /3 bpb.de/shop/zeitschri…
Der jüngste Appell von @JohannesVarwick et al warnt vor "Panikstimmung" im Umgang mit Russland und spielt die Bedrohung durch ein radikal-revisionistisches Russland unter Putin herunter. Eine kurze Gegenrede /1 stern.de/politik/deutsc…
Es handelt sich dabei um eine Ansammlung altbekannter Denk- und Redefiguren, die in der Vision von Deutschland als "Zivilmacht" (Hanns W. Maull) verankert sind /2
Die Unterzeichner fordern "Kompromisse". Doch wie sollen Verhandlungen Putin von kinetischen und hybriden Angriffen auf Europa abhalten? /3
Russia’s illegal war of aggression against Ukraine has upended Europe's security architecture, yet Germany’s moralised, dysfunctional foreign policy discourse traps us in a Groundhog Day loop. Trump II’s alignment with Putin makes it even worse. A short🧵/1
It’s not just cognitive dissonance – it’s a case of what Karl Deutsch called 'pathological learning'. Germany is failing to adapt to new realities. Outdated behaviours or beliefs are being reinforced despite clear evidence of their inadequacy /2
For decades🇩🇪was a ‘civilian power’ (Hanns W. Maull): rejecting militarism, ‘Never again,’ Ostpolitik etc. In 2025, that is not enough to counter mounting threats to our sovereignty and national security /3
Im Herbst 2024 erschienen in der Zeitschrift SIRIUS Rezensionen zu China-Büchern, darunter Oertels neuestes Werk und mein Buch 'Germany and China'. Auffällig war ein Verriss von Susanne Weigelin-Schwiedrziks 'China und die Neuordnung der Welt' (Brandstätter Verlag, 2023) /1
Trotz detaillierter Kenntnisse zu Chinas Außen- und Innenpolitik gelänge es der Autorin nicht ein "differenziertes, kohärentes und realistisches Bild von der derzeitigen internationalen Krisensituation und der Rolle Chinas darin zu vermitteln" /2 degruyter.com/document/doi/1…
Konkret bemängelt der Rezensent Krause, dass Weigelin-Schwiedrzik Chinas Position im Ukraine-Krieg als neutral darstelle, obwohl Peking "ein möglichst schnelles Ende des Ukraine-Kriegs will – aber zugunsten Russlands und am besten mit der völligen Unterwerfung der Ukraine" /3
Tomorrow’s German election could be Europe’s most pivotal since Brexit 2016. Can a functioning coalition emerge? Or will Germany turn ungovernable? What’s at stake for Europe’s future? A short 🧵/1
Polls favour @_FriedrichMerz (CDU/CSU) to lead Germany’s next government. Yet preference falsification and @dieLinke's rise in the polls signal a wild card. Tomorrow evening we could be in for a surprising election result /2
@_FriedrichMerz @dieLinke And have a look at this electoral map. The far-right @AfD is set to surge in the East. The centre-right @CDUCSUbt is poised to win big in the West. What does that tell us about the state of German unification thirty-five years after the fall of the Berlin Wall? /3
Folks need to understand that elite capture / strategic corruption is real: in the 🇺🇸, in 🇪🇺 , wherever you look. For too long we assumed that our democratic institutions could withstand the onslaught of corporate and foreign government lobbying / influence / interference /1
What started with the Schroederisation of politics has now morphed into institutional corruption. This is the inconvenient truth, the 🐘 in the room. We now not only need strengthened 🇪🇺 military capabilities but also national and transnational movements against corruption /2
Self-serving European elites contributed to today’s mess just as much as the true believers of the MAGA movement. Both have major blind spots, just different ones. The resulting #hypernormalisation prevents necessary reforms aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability /3