In my new book ‘The Struggle for Democracy in Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong’ I critique the ‘winner-takes-all’ (你死我活) conception of politics in the People’s Republic of China /1
On p.73 I cite Thomas Gold’s definition of Chinese political culture /2
I subsequently quote Joseph Fewsmith who “suggests that a ‘winner-take-all conception of politics has been the hallmark of CCP politics’”/3
Why am I revisiting these paragraphs in my new book? This morning I read Andrew Higgins New York Times report from Monday, 26 August on Jimmy Lai, the 71-year old Hong Kong tycoon, owner of the online Next magazine and staunch supporter of the pro-democracy movement /4
Higgins points out that Chinese state-media has vilified Lai “as a CIA agent, a ‘black hand’, and a member of an American-directed ‘gang of four’ supposedly responsible for orchestrating the Hong Kong protest movement”.
These accusations reveal the paranoia among CCP leaders /5
But the most remarkable paragraph in Higgins excellent New York Times report comes a bit later, which reveals the real-world implications of the CCP’s political culture of ‘you die, I live’ (你死我活) /6
Higgins writes: “China’s relentless campaign of vilification against Mr. Lai took a particular nasty turn this month when his name was purged from the genealogical records of his family across the border in southern China” /7
This act of ‘eliminating names’ — in this case Jimmy Lai’s — supports Thomas Gold’s definition of Chinese political culture /8
Higgins reports: “His relatives, according to a report in Ta Kung Pao, a Communist Party-controlled newspaper in Hong Kong that invariably refers to him as ‘fatty Lai’, deleted his name from a family tree going back 28 generations, declaring him a ‘traitor’ to his ancestors... /9
... and his country who is no longer part of the clan.”
Anyone vaguely familiar with Chinese culture and society will understand how crass this campaign of demonization of Chinese party-state critics like Jimmy Lai is /10
Anyone who still believes that the Chinese Communist Party is a guardian of ‘Chinese culture’ and anyone who argues that the cultural identity of China is somehow pre-political should reflect on what has just happened to Jimmy Lai, a very good and decent man /End
Tomorrow’s German election could be Europe’s most pivotal since Brexit 2016. Can a functioning coalition emerge? Or will Germany turn ungovernable? What’s at stake for Europe’s future? A short 🧵/1
Polls favour @_FriedrichMerz (CDU/CSU) to lead Germany’s next government. Yet preference falsification and @dieLinke's rise in the polls signal a wild card. Tomorrow evening we could be in for a surprising election result /2
@_FriedrichMerz @dieLinke And have a look at this electoral map. The far-right @AfD is set to surge in the East. The centre-right @CDUCSUbt is poised to win big in the West. What does that tell us about the state of German unification thirty-five years after the fall of the Berlin Wall? /3
Folks need to understand that elite capture / strategic corruption is real: in the 🇺🇸, in 🇪🇺 , wherever you look. For too long we assumed that our democratic institutions could withstand the onslaught of corporate and foreign government lobbying / influence / interference /1
What started with the Schroederisation of politics has now morphed into institutional corruption. This is the inconvenient truth, the 🐘 in the room. We now not only need strengthened 🇪🇺 military capabilities but also national and transnational movements against corruption /2
Self-serving European elites contributed to today’s mess just as much as the true believers of the MAGA movement. Both have major blind spots, just different ones. The resulting #hypernormalisation prevents necessary reforms aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability /3
German strategic culture remains stuck in the outdated paradigm of economic interdependence. Although 'change through trade' has been discredited, no new strategic framework has emerged to take its place. This shift would require not only new ideas but also fresh leadership /1
I was intrigued by Johannes Volkmann @jbvolkmann, a 27-year-old candidate for the German Bundestag. As the grandson of the former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, he may come to represent a new generation of German politicians /2 hessenschau.de/politik/johann…
I noted with great interest that he has an academic background in Contemporary Chinese Studies from Oxford, complemented by his year spent in 🇨🇳 at both Tongji University and Peking University. He appears to possess the much-needed 'China competence.' /3 johannes-volkmann.de/uebermich/
Warum strebt der "treueste Verbündete des Kanzlers" (Mona Jaeger in der FAZ, 5.2.2025, ) Wolfgang Schmidt @W_Schmidt_ ein Bundestagsmandat an? Kann er sich wirklich von @Bundeskanzler Scholz emanzipieren? Ich habe da so meine Zweifel. Ein kurzer 🧵/1 archive.is/G4Xk5
"Seit 2002 arbeitet Schmidt für Scholz," schreibt Mona Jaeger, "er war sein Büroleiter zu Generalsekretärszeiten, sein Stabschef als Arbeitsminister, Staatssekretär im Finanzministerium, dann als Kanzleramtsminister Organisator der Ampelkoalition" /2 faz.net/aktuell/politi…
In der NZZ wurde ein Oppositionspolitiker zitiert, der Schmidt als «Machtabsicherungsapologet» bezeichnete. Es gehe darum, Scholz gegen Kritik in Schutz zu nehmen. Er ziehe ausserdem "einen Schutzwall um Scholz, intransparent und unkontrollierbar." /3 archive.is/Kh1fH#selectio…
I would find op-eds in favour of China engagement more convincing if they would not rest on logical fallacies. @Bkerrychina's article "Labour is right to forge more trade links with China – not doing so would be folly" is a case in point. A short 🧵 /1 theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Brown rightly points out that in the past decade or so the UK's approach to China has not been very consistent. But in my view he also frames the ongoing policy debates in terms of a false choice: as if we either have to choose between (naive) engagement or (full) decoupling /2
The point of contention is also not that Reeves went to China. German foreign minister @al_baerbock did the same. But she also had a robust public exchange with her Chinese counterpart Qin Gang. Reeves was much more deferential to the CCP. And that deserves to be critiqued /3
Five facts you need to know about 'Ilha Formosa' (美麗之島), the stunningly beautiful island-state also known as Taiwan. In this 🧵 I explain why it is in all of our interests that democratic 🇹🇼 is safeguarded against military annexation by 🇨🇳 - now and in the future /1
In the following I will assess Taiwan's turbulent history; offer reflections about sovereignty, trade, identity formation; and address the island-state's geo-economic and geo-strategic importance for the free and democratic world. But first let us rewind a bit /2
People in Taiwan have struggled against outside rule for centuries. The Dutch (1624–1662) had a colony in the south, whilst the Spanish ruled in the north (1626–1642). Uprisings by indigenous people (原住民; Lamey Island massacre) or Han settlers were violently suppressed /3