Health Nerd Profile picture
Aug 27, 2019 17 tweets 4 min read Read on X
The history of alternative medicines is fascinating

Quite interesting how these weird systems of thought came to be 1/n
For example, we have Daniel David Palmer, inventor of chiropractic

A magnetic healer by background, Palmer believed that all human health was controlled by a mystical vital energy that caused misalignments in the spine 2/n
Palmer argued that essentially all human disease - including infections such as tuberculosis - could be cured by realigning the spine (even in the late 1800s this was known to be factually incorrect) 3/n
While it is impossible to prove definitively, it is widely accepted that Palmer used the ideas of osteopathy, another 'alternative' treatment founded a decade earlier, to invent his pseudoscientific system of thought 4/n
Homeopathy is another interesting one

Founded in the late 1700s by Samuel Hahnemann, who took issue with the barbaric medical practices of the time (fair) and created a system of belief that has no basis whatsoever in fact (less fair)
Hahnemann was impacted by the medical practices of his time, especially bloodletting, which led to him creating a system of medicine that doesn't harm patients

The downside to this is that it also doesn't help them, but you can't win them all I guess?
Naturopathy is another good one. Originally invented by John Scheel in the late 1800s, the term was mostly promoted by Benedict Lust the "father" of naturopathy

Lust had some really odd beliefs
Lust subscribed to a similar school of thought to Palmer of chiropractic fame, arguing that most of human health was controlled by a vital force of some kind that flowed through our bodies, undetectable
The difference is that he thought that the best way to remedy every condition was with "natural" methods

This included, for example, restricting coffee and tea intake and warning against excessive masturbation
Seeing them side-by-side it's always quite striking how many of the major alternative medicines came from the same school of (flawed) thought at the end of the 1800s 10/n
Reiki is another interesting one - much more influenced by the traditional Japanese systems of thought, it was invented by Mikao Usui in the late 1800s
Similar to the above examples, he believed that an unmeasurable force controlled all of human health ("qi" or "chi")

He went a step further and argued that you could influence this force in other people by passing your hands over them
In many ways, this is just a natural progression. Once you've accepted the existence of an invisible, unmeasurable, unknowable force, the idea that you can manipulate this force somehow makes sense
Osteopathy is another great one. As I said, it was invented a bit prior to chiropractic by Andrew Taylor Still

Similar to Palmer, Still posited the existence of a vital force that drove most of human health
The basic beliefs of osteopathy are basically identical to chiropractic, which is why many people believe that Palmer stole Still's ideas
Still believed that the body was controlled by a vital force that transcended physicality, and could be manipulated by correcting problems with the musculoskeletal system

He thought that any illness could be cured through the body's natural defenses, aided by osteopathy
Another common theme through all of these systems of thought is that you can cure all disease using them

Similarly, they are all pretty much entirely wrong

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Health Nerd

Health Nerd Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GidMK

Mar 4
The final large published trial on ivermectin for COVID-19, PRINCIPLE, is now out. Main findings:

1. Clinically unimportant (~1-2day reduction) in time to resolution of symptoms.
2. No benefit for hospitalization/death. Image
Now, you may be asking "why does anyone care at all any more about ivermectin for COVID?" to which I would respond "yes"

We already knew pretty much everything this study shows. That being said, always good to have more data!
The study is here:

For me, the main finding is pretty simple - ivermectin didn't impact the likelihood of people going to hospital or dying from COVID-19. This has now been shown in every high-quality study out there.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38431155/
Read 8 tweets
Feb 20
Fascinating study.

What's particularly interesting is a finding that the authors don't really discuss in their conclusion. These results appear to show that gender affirming care is associated with a reduction in suicide risk 1/n
2/n The paper is a retrospective cohort study that compares young adults and some teens who were referred for gender related services in Finland with a cohort that was matched using age and sex. The median age in the study was 19, so the majority of the population are adults. Image
3/n The study is very limited. The authors had access to the Finnish registries which include a wide range of data, but chose to only correct their cohorts for age, sex, and number of psychiatric appointments prior to their inclusion in the cohort.
Read 11 tweets
Oct 26, 2023
These headlines have to be some of the most ridiculous I've seen in a while

The study tested 18 different PFAS in a tiny sample of 176 people. Of those, one had a barely significant association with thyroid cancer

This is genuinely just not news at all Image
Here's the study. I'm somewhat surprised it even got published if I'm honest. A tiny case-control study, they looked at 88 people with thyroid cancer and 88 controls thelancet.com/journals/ebiom…
Here are the main results. There was a single measured PFAS which had a 'significant' association with the cancer, the others just look a bit like noise to me Image
Read 7 tweets
Oct 11, 2023
A new study has gone viral for purportedly showing that running therapy had similar efficacy to medication for depression

Which is weird, because a) it's not a very good study and b) seems not to show that at all 1/n
Image
Image
2/n The study is here. The authors describe it as a "partially randomized patient preference design", which is a wildly misleading term. In practice, this is simply a cohort study, where ~90% of the patients self-selected into their preferred treatment sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
3/n This is a big problem, because it means that there are likely confounding factors between the two groups (i.e. who is likely to choose running therapy over meds?). Instead of a useful, randomized trial, this is a very small (n=141) non-randomized paper
Read 15 tweets
Oct 6, 2023
This is SO MISLEADING

The study showed that COVID-19 had, if anything, very few long-term issues for children! As a new father, I find this data very reassuring regarding #LongCovid in kids 1/n Image
2/n The study is here, it's a retrospective cohort comparing children aged 0-14 who had COVID-19 to a matched control using a database of primary care visits in Italy
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ap…
3/ The authors found that there was an increased risk of a range of diagnoses for the kids with COVID-19 after their acute disease, including things like runny noses, anxiety/depression, diarrhoea, etc Image
Read 13 tweets
Sep 20, 2023
This study has recently gone viral, with people saying that it shows that nearly 20% of highly vaccinated people get Long COVID

I don't think it's reasonable to draw these conclusions based on this research. Let's talk about bias 1/n Image
2/n The study is here. It is a survey of people who tested positive to COVID-19 in Western Australia from July-Aug 2022 medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
3/n This immediately gives us our first source of bias

We KNOW that most cases of COVID-19 were missed at this point in the pandemic, so we're only getting the sample of those people who were sick enough to go and get tested
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(