This quote comes from Trump. But it is ideologically aligned with Scheer, Ford & Kenney and their focus on prosperity over the existential threat of climate change from FF use.
Kind of makes you wonder what the common factor is behind the focus on prosperity vs survival of the planet.
It’s not obvious, because Trump and Ford are both boorish, gluttonous, & avarice fuelled capitalists.
But there is one factor that is common to all prosperity seekers.
The subject is taboo. Because it seems to involve religion. We are culturally indoctrinated to refrain from discussing religion.
But that pairing is a ruse. A deception to cloak the actions of a nefarious cult that generates exclusive access to wealth.
Dominionists have a stranglehold on the US Government and want exclusive access to Canadian resources.
They call themselves Christian, but that is to distract from the annihilation cult they all support. Some members, like Scheer & Kenney, believe their own rhetoric.
Others, like Trump & Ford, stand to benefit through the exclusive access to fossil fuel resource production. The impact on the rest of the globe’s inhabitants isn’t a consideration. It’s not on their radar.
These are people whose belief system &/or value system are toxic and self-serving. They cloak themselves in a shield of religious fundamentalism to preemptively disarm any criticism of their actions and dogmatic adherence.
This makes examining or dismantling their malevolent association and its intent difficult to accomplish.
It’s time to confront the taboo regarding criticism of “religious” doctrine.
Or perish en masse because it makes us uncomfortable to broach the subject.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I have seen a tendency to favour radical left progressives in her analysis. But she remains quite accurate nonetheless. Gilmore hasn’t misrepresented facts & truth, often going above and beyond to establish a common reality & truth.
We are being forced to judge her credibility.
Where is mistrust originating? I’ll take a stab at this.
Gilmore wasn’t fired from her Friday fact checking segment. The management at CTV decided the backlash from loyal viewers wasn’t worth losing viewers (money) to establish reality.
This is sabotage of Liberal candidates using identity politics to destroy reputations.
Anyone under the impression these two people are pro Canada? No.
They’re antiestablishment anarcho syndicalists seeking to facilitate the social collapse we see occurring in US right now.
This bullshit needs to be exposed!
It’s occurring on both ends of extreme politics.
Rebel News destroying an Edmonton candidate who had a great chance to oust Tim Uppal.
When you align these efforts side by side, they’re the same.
They’re exactly the same.
Demonstrating clearly that the accusation I’ve made so many times about far left activists is 💯 accurate. Radical progressive left are NOT trying to win, they’re demoralizing voters.
Smith has done much to undermine the Team Canada bargaining position.
She is not advocating for Alberta from the position of loyal patriot. She’s bargaining on behalf of Trump’s interests; O&G oligarch’s interests.
Your confusion is understandable, she was elected as premier.
But was she really?
She was installed as leader after the former leader was ousted by radicalized religious fundamentalists in UCP. Kenney left even though he won the leadership confidence vote, but only by a small margin.
This is someone who is trying to get people to not vote.
Do not buy their bogus arguments.
In case you think I’m overreacting…
These are people trying to demoralize voters who have indicated a preference for the liberal party because of Trump. Because it’s clear LPC and PMMC are in majority party territory.
So this narrative is targeting the soft voter support.
People who don’t typically vote Liberal but feel motivated by fear to lend PMMC support to prevent a calamity like US annexation.
Typically that would be NDP voters and centrist conservatives.
Trump & his international conspirators are seeking to create a minority government.
But sure, Oxford’s standards are so weak they gave Carney a PhD without vetting his dissertation and it’s only come to be recognized as problematic 30 years later by Canadian cons desperately seeking a compromising narrative with which to smear PMMC during a federal campaign.
That accusation seems reasonable to some people? 🤪🤔🤭
Who? People who don’t have post secondary degrees or didn’t finish high school? That’s not disrespect. I have no expectations that those who don’t value educational achievement would appreciate the significance of Oxford.