Scholars Oliver Hahl, Minjae Kim, and Ezra W. Zickerman Sivan, in “The Authentic Appeal of the Lying Demagogue,”
explain: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
People who want to destroy the "political establishment" experienced a "crisis of legitimacy”
@BrodiePiper 3/ This “crisis of legitimacy” happens when people no longer believe the political establishment serves “real” Americans (like them) and instead champions the interests of “others.”
Obama was, to them, the symbol of a political establishment gone wrong.
So they lied about him.
@BrodiePiper 4/ When reactionaries lie, they justify the lie by saying that the lie points out an important truth⤵️
There weren't many laws, so people (white men) could do what they wanted.
MAGA = take America back to those days.
How do they reconcile white-male-rule with “we the people” and democracy?
They don't like democracy. They say things like ⤵️
@BrodiePiper 10/ They think nature forms a hierarchy & white men belong on top: white women and other races are better off under the dominion of white men.
@BrodiePiper 11/ According to this view, since 1789 others have been encroaching on the personal liberty of white men, and upsetting the balance.
Liberals see the New Deal as good: minimum wage, social security, the VA bill helped eliminate income inequality and created opportunity for all.
@BrodiePiper 12/ Reactionaries see such legislation as an evil encroachment on "personal liberty."
Minimum wage, according to this view, infringes on the liberty of people to enter contracts. If a person is willing to work for 2 cents an hour, that's none of the government's business.
@BrodiePiper 13/ Reactionaries have been trying to roll back the New Deal.
They hate all the government regulations put in place in the past 100 years.
You can't roll a country backwards and get rid of regulations and regulatory agencies without being destructive.
@BrodiePiper 14/ Nancy McClean in ⤵️ talks about the rage felt by many when the Supreme Court in 1954 (Brown v. Board of Education) held that segregation in schools was illegal.
People were furious that the Supreme Court would try to tell people how to live their lives.
@BrodiePiper 15/ The Civil Rights movement (ignited by Brown v. Board) and the women's rights movement threw the reactionaries into a destructive panic.
In response, the GOP turned into a full-on authoritarian / reactionary party. See⤵️
Liberals over the past few decades bought into a myth, which goes like this:
The future has been determined: America will continue becoming more inclusive and diverse.
History is a river carrying us along . . .
@BrodiePiper . . . we don't even have to row. (This is what Snyder calls the Politics of Inevitability)
When the myth breaks—when, for example, Russia selected our president in 2016, a president trying to undo all the progress of the past 50 years— liberals are shocked.
They believed . . .
@BrodiePiper . . . Jim Crow, the KKK, etc, were forever relegated to the fringes.
Politics of Inevitability took away responsibility. (We don't even have to row!)
The shock ("this is all new!") combined with giving up responsibility explains why so many people feel helpless dispair.
For years I was perplexed by what I was seeing on left-leaning Twitter, political blogs, and partisan reporting.
I had the feeling that, in its way, what I was seeing was comparable to Fox: Lots of bad information and even unhinged conspiracy theories.
2terikanefield.com/invented-narra…
Of course, if I suggested that, I was blasted for "both-sidesing."
Then I discovered an area of scholarship: Communications and the overlap between communications and political science.
Another contradiction: when people demanded indictments RIGHT NOW (in 2021 and early 2022) the reason was, "Everyone knows he's guilty! Look at all the evidence!"
We saw the J6 committee findings.
Trump isn't saying "I didn't do it." He's saying, "I had the right to do it."
2
We all know what he did. The question is, "Do people want a president who acts like Trump?"
A lot of people do.
People show me polls that a guilty finding would change minds.
I say rubbish. Use common sense. He lost in 2020 and he lost the popular vote in 2016. . .
3/
. . . because it is designed to keep people hooked. People need to stay glued to the screen for hour after hour.
But to hook people, you need to scare them. The Facebook whistleblower testified that content that produces strong emotions like anger gets more engagement.
2/
Fox does the same thing. There is a few minutes of news, but the facts get lost as commentators and TV personalities speculate and scare their audiences.
Before you yell at me for comparing MSNBC to FOX, read all of this:
If I write another blog post addressing the outrage cycle here on Twitter and in the MSNBC ecosystem, it will be to explore why so many people who believe they are liberal or progressive actually want a police state.
1/
Today alone, a handful of people who consider themselves liberal or progressive told me that the "traitors need to be arrested and prosecuted."
In 2019, back when I wore myself out tamping down misinformation, I explained the legal meaning of treason.
2/
Back then, I now realize, people asked politely: "Can Trump be prosecuted for treason (over the Russia election stuff).
I explained that wouldn't happen.
Now it's different. It's more like fascist chants.
3/